From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
"Eugen Hristev" <eugen.hristev@linaro.org>,
"Nicolas Ferre" <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
"Claudiu Beznea" <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>,
"Cai Huoqing" <cai.huoqing@linux.dev>,
"Haibo Chen" <haibo.chen@nxp.com>,
"Shawn Guo" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
"Sascha Hauer" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
"Pengutronix Kernel Team" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
"Fabio Estevam" <festevam@gmail.com>,
"Marek Vasut" <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
"Magnus Damm" <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
"Lad Prabhakar" <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>,
"Maxime Coquelin" <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
"Alexandre Torgue" <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
"Chen-Yu Tsai" <wens@csie.org>,
"Jernej Skrabec" <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
"Samuel Holland" <samuel@sholland.org>,
"Francesco Dolcini" <francesco@dolcini.it>,
"João Paulo Gonçalves" <jpaulo.silvagoncalves@gmail.com>,
"Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Fabrice Gasnier" <fabrice.gasnier@foss.st.com>,
"Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Christophe JAILLET" <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>,
"Julien Stephan" <jstephan@baylibre.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/12] iio: adc: Remove redundant pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() calls
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 16:37:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250709163756.32b0e1d1@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250708231152.971398-1-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, 9 Jul 2025 02:11:52 +0300
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(), pm_runtime_put_sync_autosuspend(),
> pm_runtime_autosuspend() and pm_request_autosuspend() now include a call
> to pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(). Remove the now-reduntant explicit call to
> pm_runtime_mark_last_busy().
>
> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Some comments for the future as more about what can be improved on the back
of this than what you have here.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/rcar-gyroadc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/rcar-gyroadc.c
> index cc326f21d398..3a17b3898bf6 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/rcar-gyroadc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/rcar-gyroadc.c
> @@ -163,12 +163,10 @@ static int rcar_gyroadc_set_power(struct rcar_gyroadc *priv, bool on)
> {
> struct device *dev = priv->dev;
>
This is a very clear example of where the *_set_power() pattern is a bad idea.
There are two calls of this function, one with it hard coded as on and one with it
hard coded as off. We can just push the pm_runtime_resume_and_get()
to the on case etc.
I don't mind that much if we do so as a follow up patch so this one can
be the mechanical change and then we follow up with the enabled simplification.
> - if (on) {
> + if (on)
> return pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev);
> - } else {
> - pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dev);
> - return pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev);
> - }
> +
> + return pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev);
> }
>
> static int rcar_gyroadc_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1015.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1015.c
> index 48549d617e5f..f2a93c63ca14 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1015.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1015.c
> @@ -374,12 +374,10 @@ static int ads1015_set_power_state(struct ads1015_data *data, bool on)
> int ret;
> struct device *dev = regmap_get_device(data->regmap);
>
> - if (on) {
> + if (on)
> ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev);
> - } else {
> - pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dev);
> + else
> ret = pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev);
> - }
>
> return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
So this one has a stub version which only brings benefits because
we have checks on the pm_runtime_put_autosuspend() path failing
(which it does if we have !CONFIG_PM).
I think the right option there is check the return value is < 0
for the resume_and_get() and don't check the _put_autosuspend()
return value at all. Then we can just push this down to the
call sites as all of them hard code the bool value.
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-09 19:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20250708231144.971170-1-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
2025-07-08 23:11 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] iio: dac: Remove redundant pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() calls Sakari Ailus
2025-07-09 8:48 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-07-09 15:49 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-08 23:11 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] iio: adc: " Sakari Ailus
2025-07-09 3:52 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2025-07-09 15:37 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2025-08-25 11:57 ` Sakari Ailus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250709163756.32b0e1d1@jic23-huawei \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=cai.huoqing@linux.dev \
--cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=eugen.hristev@linaro.org \
--cc=fabrice.gasnier@foss.st.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=francesco@dolcini.it \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=haibo.chen@nxp.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=jpaulo.silvagoncalves@gmail.com \
--cc=jstephan@baylibre.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=samuel@sholland.org \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox