From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, lee@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com,
angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com,
broonie@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kernel@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] regulator: Add support for MediaTek MT6363 SPMI PMIC Regulators
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 10:16:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202507150934.VLFQsCyK-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250707134451.154346-5-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Hi AngeloGioacchino,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on broonie-regulator/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on lee-mfd/for-mfd-next lee-mfd/for-mfd-fixes lee-leds/for-leds-next linus/master v6.16-rc6 next-20250714]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/AngeloGioacchino-Del-Regno/dt-bindings-regulator-Document-MediaTek-MT6316-PMIC-Regulators/20250707-214911
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250707134451.154346-5-angelogioacchino.delregno%40collabora.com
patch subject: [PATCH v2 4/8] regulator: Add support for MediaTek MT6363 SPMI PMIC Regulators
config: openrisc-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250715/202507150934.VLFQsCyK-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: or1k-linux-gcc (GCC) 15.1.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250715/202507150934.VLFQsCyK-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202507150934.VLFQsCyK-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/regulator/mt6363-regulator.c: In function 'mt6363_vemc_set_voltage_sel':
>> drivers/regulator/mt6363-regulator.c:457:23: error: implicit declaration of function 'FIELD_PREP' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
457 | sel = FIELD_PREP(MT6363_RG_VEMC_VOSEL_1_MASK, sel);
| ^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/regulator/mt6363-regulator.c: In function 'mt6363_vemc_get_voltage_sel':
>> drivers/regulator/mt6363-regulator.c:489:23: error: implicit declaration of function 'FIELD_GET' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
489 | ret = FIELD_GET(MT6363_RG_VEMC_VOSEL_1_MASK, sel);
| ^~~~~~~~~
vim +/FIELD_PREP +457 drivers/regulator/mt6363-regulator.c
432
433 static int mt6363_vemc_set_voltage_sel(struct regulator_dev *rdev, unsigned int sel)
434 {
435 const u16 tma_unlock_key = MT6363_TMA_UNLOCK_VALUE;
436 struct regmap *regmap = rdev->regmap;
437 unsigned int val;
438 u16 mask;
439 int ret;
440
441 ret = regmap_read(rdev->regmap, MT6363_TOP_TRAP, &val);
442 if (ret)
443 return ret;
444
445 if (val > 1)
446 return -EINVAL;
447
448 /* Unlock TMA for writing */
449 ret = regmap_bulk_write(rdev->regmap, MT6363_TOP_TMA_KEY_L,
450 &tma_unlock_key, sizeof(tma_unlock_key));
451 if (ret)
452 return ret;
453
454 /* If HW trapping value is 1, use VEMC_VOSEL_1 instead of VEMC_VOSEL_0 */
455 if (val == 1) {
456 mask = MT6363_RG_VEMC_VOSEL_1_MASK;
> 457 sel = FIELD_PREP(MT6363_RG_VEMC_VOSEL_1_MASK, sel);
458 } else {
459 mask = rdev->desc->vsel_mask;
460 }
461
462 /* Function must return the result of this write operation */
463 ret = regmap_update_bits(regmap, rdev->desc->vsel_reg, mask, sel);
464
465 /* Unconditionally re-lock TMA */
466 val = 0;
467 regmap_bulk_write(rdev->regmap, MT6363_TOP_TMA_KEY_L, &val, 2);
468
469 return ret;
470 }
471
472 static int mt6363_vemc_get_voltage_sel(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
473 {
474 unsigned int sel, trap;
475 int ret;
476
477 ret = regmap_read(rdev->regmap, rdev->desc->vsel_reg, &sel);
478 if (ret)
479 return ret;
480
481 ret = regmap_read(rdev->regmap, MT6363_TOP_TRAP, &trap);
482 if (ret)
483 return ret;
484
485 /* If HW trapping value is 1, use VEMC_VOSEL_1 instead of VEMC_VOSEL_0 */
486 if (trap > 1)
487 return -EINVAL;
488 else if (trap == 1)
> 489 ret = FIELD_GET(MT6363_RG_VEMC_VOSEL_1_MASK, sel);
490 else
491 ret = sel & rdev->desc->vsel_mask;
492
493 return ret;
494 }
495
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-15 2:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-07 13:44 [PATCH v2 0/8] Add support MT6316/6363/MT6373 PMICs regulators and MFD AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2025-07-07 13:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] dt-bindings: regulator: Document MediaTek MT6316 PMIC Regulators AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2025-07-08 19:22 ` Rob Herring
2025-07-07 13:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] regulator: Add support for MediaTek MT6316 SPMI " AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2025-07-07 13:44 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] dt-bindings: regulator: Document MediaTek MT6363 " AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2025-07-08 4:09 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2025-07-07 13:44 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] regulator: Add support for MediaTek MT6363 SPMI " AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2025-07-08 4:57 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2025-07-15 2:16 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-07-07 13:44 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] dt-bindings: regulator: Document MediaTek MT6373 " AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2025-07-07 13:44 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] regulator: Add support for MediaTek MT6373 SPMI " AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2025-07-07 13:44 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] dt-bindings: mfd: Add binding for MediaTek MT6363 series SPMI PMIC AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2025-07-07 16:05 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-07-08 19:31 ` Rob Herring
2025-07-07 13:44 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] drivers: mfd: Add support for MediaTek SPMI PMICs and MT6363/73 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202507150934.VLFQsCyK-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).