From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F03B3C83F27 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2025 12:55:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To: From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=aJwGBTyaWNx+YKRbPSu2Hb2PQGZPinCJqDZl3W+uWVc=; b=413d+uFiJS8GGOLeRTrQ76nwbJ ke3ch/4+sD7meUsaonHIfUo/aWwbbERs1S5ZXYlPwghO3EqGFduq+blpyiywuE18VXN7XcR4JiWxo nFRQUF+YN1axLXfBVJdokgqnnfo3YILITLjO3qqhjxLoMMv2n8PxfCBKEhtlXJvdnxrwvimxRp6rO o12+Hy3eJBt/kEko8eVuGmcxWDOsXFzLaORCWeARgH+qlx3fvwjozeiCyFN5nofe2FLcoOQh30zpX VtyLAdnq4qZxnkqAS3CUqZmyUeF6KnZn4+TFYIxO+9/2NFsakVJV73npT+0Xdm+COjRy26T+iLXjE ZCF9ZoMg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ubfBV-0000000589D-36Py; Tue, 15 Jul 2025 12:55:01 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([172.105.4.254]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ubeQZ-000000051pd-12Ej for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 15 Jul 2025 12:06:31 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9896361140; Tue, 15 Jul 2025 12:06:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E7195C4CEE3; Tue, 15 Jul 2025 12:06:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1752581190; bh=SKX8mwbvuYrvzxvuQc2xX0ubBY9BG5T8COQUMdXHRpk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=aLOwrxt31MYxFG3Kdav0yrmN1YeAvoNS2FBt+FHeDTE2S1jd9VwzmsrBk0/U5+VpG BHBvUpJoiqWnFP0iGdvqb8Dq0aUeCbuNradkN8yfthUsnDTXgOMQyNuIrZUoaFNfQz eUvKpJjtpXgpBKivZ0ecySnNT85pT2nQUsYzhZrHAPvXsn/LzThkw9c5Ow86byQVV9 vPQdTQdjsMthMeHHrOAn+EhsuWvw8weiQrf0jPG3frRD6Tnvxfc1v6RlXzxM087pVP PQgu5bkOnsLPBzIU6+ereZVuQbVeSpUljQu1QQOEbYdk03tI0KFXLdDUlV+QWC/6hH 8zgcLbJPy3i2A== Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 14:06:16 +0200 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Shuai Xue , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Hanjun Guo , "Luck, Tony" , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, justin.he@arm.com, ardb@kernel.org, ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com, ashish.kalra@amd.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, tglx@linutronix.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, lenb@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, robert.moore@intel.com, lvying6@huawei.com, xiexiuqi@huawei.com, zhuo.song@linux.alibaba.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com, lpieralisi@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, yazen.ghannam@amd.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, mingo@redhat.com, robin.murphy@arm.com, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, bp@alien8.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, tanxiaofei@huawei.com, mawupeng1@huawei.com, linmiaohe@huawei.com, naoya.horiguchi@nec.com, james.morse@arm.com, tongtiangen@huawei.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jarkko@kernel.org Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v18 1/2] ACPI: APEI: send SIGBUS to current task if synchronous memory error not recovered Message-ID: <20250715140530.42c6bdc4@sal.lan> In-Reply-To: References: <20250404112050.42040-1-xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com> <20250404112050.42040-2-xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com> <0c0bc332-0323-4e43-a96b-dd5f5957ecc9@huawei.com> <709ee8d2-8969-424c-b32b-101c6a8220fb@linux.alibaba.com> <353809e7-5373-0d54-6ddb-767bc5af9e5f@huawei.com> <653abdd4-46d2-4956-b49c-8f9c309af34d@linux.alibaba.com> <20250428152350.GA23615@willie-the-truck> <6671c3cc-5119-4544-bcb5-17e8cc2d7057@linux.alibaba.com> <3a465782-a8ff-4be8-9c15-e46f39196757@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.1 (GTK 3.24.49; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Em Mon, 14 Jul 2025 19:30:19 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" escreveu: > Hi, >=20 > On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 1:54=E2=80=AFPM Shuai Xue wrote: > > > > =E5=9C=A8 2025/7/1 21:56, Rafael J. Wysocki =E5=86=99=E9=81=93: =20 > > > On Tue, Jul 1, 2025 at 1:00=E2=80=AFPM Shuai Xue wrote: =20 > > >> =20 > > >> >=E5=9C=A8 2025/4/28 23:23, Will Deacon =E5=86=99=E9=81=93: =20 > > >> >> On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 09:10:09AM +0800, Shuai Xue wrote: =20 > > >> >>> =E5=9C=A8 2025/4/25 09:00, Hanjun Guo =E5=86=99=E9=81=93: =20 > > >> >>>> Call force_sig(SIGBUS) directly in ghes_do_proc() is not my f= avourite, > > >> >>>> but I can bear that, please add > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> Thanks > > >> >>>> Hanjun =20 > > >> >>> > > >> >>> Thanks. Hanjun. > > >> >>> > > >> >>> @Rafael, @Catalin, > > >> >>> > > >> >>> Both patch 1 and 2 have reviewed-by tag from the arm64 ACPI =20 > > >> maintainers, Hanjun, =20 > > >> >>> now. Are you happpy to pick and queue this patch set to acpi t= ree =20 > > >> or arm tree? =20 > > >> >> > > >> >> Since this primarily touches drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c, I think = it should > > >> >> go via the ACPI tree and not the arm64 one. > > >> >> > > >> >> Will =20 > > >> > > > >> >Hi, Will, > > >> > > > >> >Thank you for your confirmation :) > > >> > > > >> >@Rafael, do you have more comments on this patch set? > > >> > > > >> >Thanks you. > > >> > > > >> >Best Regards, > > >> >Shuai =20 > > >> > > >> Hi, all, > > >> > > >> Gentle ping. > > >> > > >> Does ACPI or APEI tree still active? Looking forward to any response= . =20 > > > > > > For APEI changes, you need an ACK from one of the reviewers listed in > > > the MAINTAINERS entry for APEI. > > > > > > Thanks! =20 > > > > Hi, Rafael > > > > Sorry, I missed your email which goes in span (: > > > > ARM maintain @Catalin points that: > > =20 > > > James Morse is listed as reviewer of the ACPI APEI code but he's busy > > > with resctrl/MPAM. Adding Lorenzo, Sudeep and Hanjun as arm64 ACPI > > > maintainers, hopefully they can help. =20 > > > > And Hanjun explictly gived his Reviewed-by tag in this thread, is that > > happy for you for merge? =20 >=20 > Not really. >=20 > I need an ACK or R-by from a reviewer listed in the APEI entry in MAINTAI= NERS. >=20 > If James Morse is not able to fill that role (and AFAICS he's not been > for quite some time now), I'd expect someone else to step up. Rafael, If you want, I can step-up to help with APEI review. Besides my work with RAS/EDAC in the past, I'm doing some work those days adding APEI injection in QEMU those days (currently focused on ARM error injection via SEA and GPIO). Regards, Mauro