Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] dt-bindings: ufs: mediatek,ufs: add MT8195 compatible and update clock nodes

Peter Wang (王信友)
2025-10-20T11:46:53Z

On Mon, 2025-10-20 at 13:04 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>
>
> Sorry Peter, but a 10 seconds research on your side would have made
> you aware of
> who I am.
>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/tree/MAINTAINERS?h=v6.6*n2346__;Iw!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!j46OdEicZdlCQk4DoUc9bC32inkXJnyn4mTFypGGCK_bH1CJlW4Et75egmmKPBOgf3SHcPJTdX_vt7w_hp82-lkypdUcP32s$
>
> ...then a 60 seconds research would reveal way more than just that
> about me,
> and also your colleagues know me quite a bit :-)

Hi AngeloGioacchino,

Yes, however, I was not aware of this when I responded last year.
There have been internal discussions since then, and we have
decided that new MediaTek maintainers will be added.
This position is still not appropriate for someone external
to MediaTek. I hope for your understanding.

>
> Besides, you don't really need to know who somebody is to make an
> upstream review:
> this is a community, and a good patch may come from old and
> recognized contributors
> as much as from new ones sending their first patch upstream.
>
>
>

I agree with your point, perhaps we simply have different
viewpoints, but our goal is the same—to make this community better.
If there are any shortcomings in our ideas, we can discuss
them and focus on the patch itself, rather than resorting to
blanket criticisms such as labeling downstream as low quality
or upstream as inherently superior.
Such remarks do not contribute to the improvement of the community.

Thanks
Peter