Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] dt-bindings: ufs: mediatek,ufs: add MT8195 compatible and update clock nodes

Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-10-20T10:02:43Z

On 20/10/2025 11:44, Peter Wang (王信友) wrote:
>>
>> Consider stepping down and choosing them if they better understand
>> how
>> upstream works.
>>
>> As Rob wrote earlier:
>>
>> "Sounds like we need a new maintainer then. They clearly don't
>> understand that downstream doesn't exist."
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>
> I must reiterate that I do not oppose patches that are
> beneficial to the community; I only object to patches that are
> not helpful.

Let's quote you again:

"*In addition*, it will require MediaTek to put in extra
effort to migrate the kernel. "

This is ADDITIONAL argument you used. This is what you wrote, this is
what you claimed to be ADDITIONAL argument.

In your opinion ADDITIONAL argument is downstream and you still do not
understand why such argument is instant NAK for you as reviewer.

Best regards,
Krzysztof