From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 477B2C87FCB for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2025 14:56:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=1HLOCXWX7xlvVaVCpmsch6Y2kBwILPZD+fHs79OQ++o=; b=b2e6NFfLKmKYWzjhdAm7Dl0WaY llrmpNBCP+hbs+6DRBLRFQ23AyJrNMrh/DVfZgNHsOVEKqaz5aZXuzViWYKEOS97OWQ73W2Cs0Dyv YQ8H8JtIlZ7hhbQc5zINmbr1T0liRUbWo78JYW9ipNXBVDWIKOvSFuBxoUwW1EUMvwTL48Iy40/AX DbG8ih3BYSD3tM7B+WHJL+gA8F40BvVe9uCmZ0nUmUAoTnbff4AmUtJdLx+BOeqrGC3vzn6c/0qVb YTyQmFsKPGVF5AEnfeHwzSIA3lySqrTEtG0hrOQOZXOCNEgKykdm9B6zeRsTVyVE5gjztwXS0CJWt 2FAyDjdA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uh8E3-00000001nA0-2gnu; Wed, 30 Jul 2025 14:56:15 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uh898-00000001maW-1FMg for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2025 14:51:11 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B04D5C57F6; Wed, 30 Jul 2025 14:51:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AAC63C4CEE3; Wed, 30 Jul 2025 14:51:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1753887068; bh=16P5bJs+DSDc/BjPMR9Go7+cwZRcZib97tLNoQMS560=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Orzv+H6tINJf2jMXAqag/2hlzgi49AmaSDRnL9MhklbvGcjN1pi3yw4uEFi2lTpZg 3lwlhBWxQtH5UqRvAJKEZWUe4tjaMcoCPMzKAklGRwio/GzocdrjFGixBs0vLrl4rd bHKjz+y5Prb/TfSC7f7pzF0G1bVB2R6MqNyny0JgZifRPWvjHQ7kc0qQXRbe3FLDRP M4manPrF/C1KU22Hzb4dv+p9teKDVyAwBgEdaTUui80kS3+QMum3NBTu4z/5+dTScF ChqvKJx4ymmEw4pdsSz3DxPRyMi/ih0QSfLfk/i5jGdeI2brM/sgFt/Gp+rUGRrOfx SgYpcQ9h7ygHQ== Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2025 15:51:00 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9?= Draszik Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Rob Herring , Conor Dooley , Sylwester Nawrocki , Chanwoo Choi , Alim Akhtar , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Russell King , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Alexandre Belloni , Peter Griffin , Tudor Ambarus , Will McVicker , kernel-team@android.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] Samsung S2MPG10 PMIC MFD-based drivers Message-ID: <20250730145100.GA6782@google.com> References: <20250730-s2mpg10-v5-0-cd133963626c@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20250730-s2mpg10-v5-0-cd133963626c@linaro.org> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250730_075110_372260_83FEB64D X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.65 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, 30 Jul 2025, André Draszik wrote: > Original cover letter further down. > > This is a resend of two patches from the original series that haven't > been merged yet. That series was merged except for the attached two > patches here. Other than rebasing against next-20250729 there are no > changes to them. > > Lee, I think Stephen's intention was to get these two merged via the > MFD tree please. Although I have no issue with this, it does seem a little odd now that the set consists of only Clk patches. Let me know what you / Stephen decide. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]