Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: scmi: Add quirk to disable checks in scmi_dev_used_by_cpus()

Sudeep Holla
2025-08-18T14:48:57Z

On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 09:46:22AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:

[...]

> which would be more in line with checking the Device Tree only, and it would
> also allow for unmodified backports to reach the stable trees. Contrary to
> what I suggested privately however, this check is done later, so we leave a
> chance for properly formed DT to return "true" earlier on.
>

Completely agree on keeping the backports for stable simple without the
need to backport the quirk infrastructure.

> What do you think? I am now leaning more towards that solution that
> leveraging the quirks as I agree it is somewhat unrelated.
>

I am confused here. Do you prefer not to have SCMI quirk based solution
upstream forever ? Or are you OK to revert the fix and move to quirks
say in v6.18 and above ?

--
Regards,
Sudeep