From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4654CA0EE4 for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2025 19:23:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To: From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=hy1ydd23Nn35o5rYJin/74Vz+k+dmzBV43TZon9livk=; b=bTmqYI/4Is00WMsWEJswYlKd5z h061Rn3Sxz6NaAG8XE1hwtrFGzW7yIxZvykAND4+NOyGF66YucuWP2Kgv+5p6yKfI/bwZsEWor+IA 5ANCPAv146H6Kt9W6BOASS2tEuAfjG7oT/ITQTj0xb06VbZ7mZE13gGWPErwrbINXWAJCf8aP9u9J kX6o9x4eybmWfwW49RH++xnZychEfXXTXedrQ6C7GXOycQYmqgZSxyxA5kAT6GpyFoQmw6nmoE8Gn OfJXOEDqbdGdfspNJ/6g9lDPIKBarb3cs3lFSRrmW0bDESWIGzlGtHjAE2SydTutXAjyiGyDPkfqv Wm3j4Etw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uo5Rv-00000008VMS-1FmZ; Mon, 18 Aug 2025 19:23:19 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c04:e001:324:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uo4wN-00000008Pnp-3B4c; Mon, 18 Aug 2025 18:50:43 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12E71600AE; Mon, 18 Aug 2025 18:50:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 26CF6C4CEEB; Mon, 18 Aug 2025 18:50:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1755543042; bh=O7W48Fc++HUPE3zXQ8Whd5Cxn4EyCN0S+wvkwo8T5RE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=t3vXP1eM67XEvvowb0QFpyCezDN/pZI5ZonNHywmtRNwjqYiwwo4HOOkRTBUzUiqh zRxRu+B7O0nMt/iXbOMtr8GdI5eyMt3HjI2JwE6p/b3P9y9BZt3r/gr4kg/jMRIUaE z4EgCJcsh+WymXdCGnjgiZsg7tp8a98/L3Gpd3lAVsgtqieOk559Jnsf+xUPuE41Tr bgNN8BZo8r4jw9s2r8eNna1mjOQzZFYMFpKts6aMsJsnXyTQzzVz9OBu7hrpr8XTxI LGY7FyLcMhw75D1yy7mBAOtpn3Ek/s8IUQUF2GBqwITGDW0nKyJpU52Awn1N1ybQh8 dvaOQQaUpAUvw== Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 11:50:41 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Florian Fainelli Cc: Stanimir Varbanov , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Broadcom internal kernel review list , Andrew Lunn , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Andrea della Porta , Nicolas Ferre , Claudiu Beznea , Phil Elwell , Jonathan Bell , Dave Stevenson Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add ethernet support for RPi5 Message-ID: <20250818115041.71041ad6@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <4c454b3c-f62c-4086-a665-282aa2f4a0e1@broadcom.com> References: <20250815135911.1383385-1-svarbanov@suse.de> <4c454b3c-f62c-4086-a665-282aa2f4a0e1@broadcom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 11:02:15 -0700 Florian Fainelli wrote: > > Few patches to enable support of ethernet on RPi5. > > > > - first patch is setting upper 32bits of DMA RX ring buffer in case of > > RX queue corruption. > > - second patch is adding a new compatible in cdns,macb yaml document > > - third patch adds compatible and configuration for raspberrypi,rp1-gem > > - forth and fifth patches are adding and enabling ethernet DT node on > > RPi5. > > > > Comments are welcome! > > netdev maintainers, do you mind if I take patches 2, 4 and 5 via the > Broadcom ARM SoC tree to avoid generating conflicts down the road? You > can take patches 1 and 3. Thanks 4, 5 make perfect sense, why patch 2? We usually take bindings.