public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@huawei.com>
To: <will@kernel.org>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: <sudeep.holla@arm.com>, <james.clark@linaro.org>,
	<robh@kernel.org>, <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	<jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>, <hejunhao3@huawei.com>,
	<linuxarm@huawei.com>, <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>,
	<xuwei5@huawei.com>, <wangyushan12@huawei.com>,
	<yangyicong@hisilicon.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] perf: arm_pmuv3: Don't use PMCCNTR_EL0 on SMT cores
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 16:45:32 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250820084534.28037-1-yangyicong@huawei.com> (raw)

From: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>

This patchset fixed CPU_CYCLES counting on SMT system. CPU_CYCLES can use
PMCCNTR_EL0 which will count the hardware processor clock rather than the
PE clock (ARM DDI0487 L.b D13.1.3) on SMT cores which fails the users
expectation as CPU_CYCLES (0x0011) is defined to count on each PE cycles.
Fix this by avoid using PMCCNTR_EL0 on SMT cores when counting CPU_CYCLES.

Changes since v1:
- remove redundant comment and add tags on Patch 1/2
- detect the SMT implementation during PMU probe rather than runtime
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20250812080830.20796-1-yangyicong@huawei.com/

Yicong Yang (2):
  perf: arm_pmuv3: Factor out PMCCNTR_EL0 use conditions
  perf: arm_pmuv3: Don't use PMCCNTR_EL0 on SMT cores

 drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c        |  3 +++
 drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c      | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 include/linux/arch_topology.h | 11 ++++++++++
 include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h  |  1 +
 4 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

-- 
2.24.0



             reply	other threads:[~2025-08-20 10:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-20  8:45 Yicong Yang [this message]
2025-08-20  8:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] perf: arm_pmuv3: Factor out PMCCNTR_EL0 use conditions Yicong Yang
2025-08-20  8:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] perf: arm_pmuv3: Don't use PMCCNTR_EL0 on SMT cores Yicong Yang
2025-09-18 13:32   ` Will Deacon
2025-09-19  8:56     ` Yicong Yang
2025-09-19  9:16       ` Mark Rutland
2025-09-19 10:27         ` Yicong Yang
2025-09-19 11:17           ` Will Deacon
2025-09-19  9:37     ` Sudeep Holla
2025-09-19 11:18       ` Will Deacon
2025-09-08  7:09 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Yicong Yang
2025-09-18 16:43 ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250820084534.28037-1-yangyicong@huawei.com \
    --to=yangyicong@huawei.com \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=hejunhao3@huawei.com \
    --cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
    --cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=prime.zeng@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=wangyushan12@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=xuwei5@huawei.com \
    --cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox