From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F767CA0FF9 for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2025 13:28:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=afXYt3L6qX8mO6fIBb3bx8iD1xtsMPHhnZMi54PeTQo=; b=y3iUiS9zcZ7uJXuq67i0YgBnCi EEIhpw9jy2DMaDA+VbRqp8CMyjlU4wN5Oc1cg45E2IqpPXrDuVQzeIwTkOYpNzi4oy276XMhp/L5j 6EgMvUGVC8p8uh9xxDkKX+2ux/hYjoP1XU831t7b+oH+KC/PCSJpAP3N9aGEBKDMutuSPJ165/2iN hqw4a5LIZQUpLU8hs4G941bUAk1HYP2liD+QA0Sh8vwaA336+dWk0N+9Rz5gZ//Dd98r9KkB8sDPh 5UnxNpuK3mqgWGdhPXCCUhVsqa9YDvrfp6kevICBeTHu1v17hNTP/IMNndlpjwu7vYDm9aOZvfG+a RBuhucgg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1urz9U-00000005otZ-06dM; Fri, 29 Aug 2025 13:28:24 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1urwaA-00000005Mw7-2YL6 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2025 10:43:47 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF6341758; Fri, 29 Aug 2025 03:43:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bogus (e133711.arm.com [10.1.196.55]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 77F773F694; Fri, 29 Aug 2025 03:43:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 11:43:41 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Peng Fan Cc: Cristian Marussi , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] firmware: arm_scmi: imx: Add documentation for MISC_BOARD_INFO Message-ID: <20250829-handsome-fast-clam-a35afd@sudeepholla> References: <20250827-sm-misc-api-v1-v3-0-82c982c1815a@nxp.com> <20250827-sm-misc-api-v1-v3-1-82c982c1815a@nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250827-sm-misc-api-v1-v3-1-82c982c1815a@nxp.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250829_034346_686492_E9B31CA8 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.78 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 12:59:13PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote: > System Manager Firmware supports getting board information, add > documentation for this API s/API/MISC_BOARD_INFO command/ > > Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan > --- > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx95.rst | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx95.rst b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx95.rst > index 4e246a78a042a79eb81be35632079c7626bbbe57..0a4d157b3ea12c7735aa19d8d6c64ae8504d0c71 100644 > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx95.rst > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx95.rst > @@ -1670,6 +1670,28 @@ protocol_id: 0x84 > |uint32 syslog[N] |Log data array, N is defined in bits[11:0] of numLogflags| > +--------------------+---------------------------------------------------------+ > > +MISC_BOARD_INFO > +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > + > +message_id: 0xE > +protocol_id: 0x84 > + > ++--------------------+---------------------------------------------------------+ > +|Return values | > ++--------------------+---------------------------------------------------------+ > +|Name |Description | > ++--------------------+---------------------------------------------------------+ > +|int32 status |SUCCESS: config name return | > +| |NOT_SUPPORTED: name not available | > ++--------------------+---------------------------------------------------------+ > +|uint32 attributes |Board specific attributes reserved for future expansion | > +| |without breaking backwards compatibility | Is 0 the expected value in this version of the spec as it is just reserved ? Please state the same explicitly here. -- Regards, Sudeep