From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 774DCCA101F for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2025 03:26:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To: From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=8gKOtpGMiRhZFeAUlKqtMcOBotYFR7k/ihU/c5rhRHU=; b=TZZWmlE5taR8ENZTJnnj7+aQXb 95sjsO0Hpk8dKK3l4ncGgr2O1oY+n+BNKryVPdJvDd5yJR3+8JqIlUabZxyJwgfY5fNBsEy2zOps6 xjGEhhPzDDJBple67CuTrJlHmZpSxCjThuh5vIjByDEZNPwm4VJ6PoR1Y7KgD8pya/jN3NCNxp1cX Tn1GOugkFtYbE+ykcnXBGFTFnwmhiOQbq7rDfKdM5sf6eoRwUy5znoV34RzHMCFnJjLXqNyho+RMB M+68KgbNvKOL7sQDtTYdVu531FR/xO+Rkmk+hmChXzs2rWHCQe1uovlcyRNwFWpjKd7ujOqJBVbTM xDatTlwQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uuN5W-0000000GR71-0VQF; Fri, 05 Sep 2025 03:26:10 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([172.105.4.254]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uuLYY-0000000FqJP-0VyA; Fri, 05 Sep 2025 01:48:02 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ACAD6028C; Fri, 5 Sep 2025 01:48:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B9B47C4CEF0; Fri, 5 Sep 2025 01:47:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1757036879; bh=nKN62gC4jkdDbMIOofqf7YTZbhCZ14cobe9mIKWrKv8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=rfe/GuOpH8cuEJ12EXJjZnxs8Ao00R7lbvEgT0XnlAnjTPGcgGRTfCzYXpMwmE4re JB1amUpWAPGJivhw+cKL6KuPsBTsuQbOX6PahAv8pplZuRsz/Ni6QerYmSW2QqVxTX axOLcpsJsjs67pNZM8kmc7tn53I4bzAhMfSw04Pdx7w5YvtcAK33nmRv7ZvCPZBJ5m LP9b0MfjoYzQwVKLI9hO+oSZ/zcJQTflFQ3sQaLFUh+0e/9roVzeGIx5lWoMueii7p Hlr39DthJTA1kcp1gG4iaESqFyHc+AlGSQP880GSonx5SeeN2cvGKj08nQzQ3xrESI Mcgm106muHXOA== Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 18:47:57 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Florian Fainelli Cc: Stanimir Varbanov , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Broadcom internal kernel review list , Andrew Lunn , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Andrea della Porta , Nicolas Ferre , Claudiu Beznea , Phil Elwell , Jonathan Bell , Dave Stevenson Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] dd ethernet support for RPi5 Message-ID: <20250904184757.1f7fb839@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <06017779-f03b-4006-8902-f0eb66a1b1a1@broadcom.com> References: <20250822093440.53941-1-svarbanov@suse.de> <06017779-f03b-4006-8902-f0eb66a1b1a1@broadcom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, 4 Sep 2025 14:07:36 -0700 Florian Fainelli wrote: > On 8/22/25 02:34, Stanimir Varbanov wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Changes in v2: > > - In 1/5 updates according to review comments (Nicolas) > > - In 1/5 added Fixes tag (Nicolas) > > - Added Reviewed-by and Acked-by tags. > > > > v1 can found at [1]. > > > > Comments are welcome! > > netdev maintainers, I took patches 4 and 5 through the Broadcom ARM SoC > tree, please take patches 1 through 3 inclusive, or let me know if I > should take patch 2 as well. Thanks for the heads up! Let me take patch 3 right now. I'm a bit unclear on where we landed with the parallel efforts to add the >32b address support :(