From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75E16CA1002 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2025 02:24:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To: From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=FWZo78uZLO9q9vWWBKEXkIUVsNTzy7SpuJxIMn96d5Y=; b=iPByVZ7l9ukczfourKXbzA6tPy vWTU+8UB7uJQgCHkEn+KuIzTkKF0vZyI7F0Pl0IMfMi3yJpldPnf/0aBRQjLzRJKJL45jWZOY67zx cCTT6FiN4fVi2dONnUAGO1mbSWkTVPc7RMVIMPMOGWVfHUoZQIbOdLKp5CsyAilCwhyat9V7pRXcw duNmLheBnz4p07aHZJO628zh1yBYRKP863Izf8U7ZipqvB9EnWidjHImUh1Tneoe3VvUnWdR2F9oL v/2Kw6KlMWTbxrmrmRg2sV8UYr+kHlzFbuuH0LqGWHlTesc146EI1gH9uybfvX00y4yIZrS5c+E4Y gtFB9csw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uuM7Q-0000000G7F0-1nqq; Fri, 05 Sep 2025 02:24:04 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([172.234.252.31]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uuLaC-0000000FqYx-3350; Fri, 05 Sep 2025 01:49:45 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 730B840391; Fri, 5 Sep 2025 01:49:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 41525C4CEF0; Fri, 5 Sep 2025 01:49:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1757036983; bh=Tu8dRLxfbouCfnvyFL1u/voFfdEj304GNbmJcjKPnMo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=arHvTfHr/x83tMaViDMhKMfNh5iHY6zBLv7spcIACyMHnOMYBO1aY1QaWGpRwfSCD R40gX0f7KdksFVTam2Hvz4prnjP85wymEqPryhHgLM61yBNfezir9fdfqFL5a6kR7E 9XnG0cP+YN/xe09/qPyTKtFb2+fkvHpancnN7Pswh4nmR8KqfM3mLhvWYxKP/EEC7w ocADly8+wcqAFffq+RHCroudIfMa7Md2iEXMGAL7u8Y2JP9DWVXHfun4TbfcARzozy DRRBC14cxIg8PsjwK4oX7iuDP7JcTjO41WrAwTbI5zi9opR0+2u9PP66rkHpD9tdkj JGCjdifIG8/fA== Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 18:49:41 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Florian Fainelli Cc: Stanimir Varbanov , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Broadcom internal kernel review list , Andrew Lunn , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Andrea della Porta , Nicolas Ferre , Claudiu Beznea , Phil Elwell , Jonathan Bell , Dave Stevenson Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] dd ethernet support for RPi5 Message-ID: <20250904184941.207518c8@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20250904184757.1f7fb839@kernel.org> References: <20250822093440.53941-1-svarbanov@suse.de> <06017779-f03b-4006-8902-f0eb66a1b1a1@broadcom.com> <20250904184757.1f7fb839@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250904_184944_793698_E97DBB33 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.70 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, 4 Sep 2025 18:47:57 -0700 Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > netdev maintainers, I took patches 4 and 5 through the Broadcom ARM SoC > > tree, please take patches 1 through 3 inclusive, or let me know if I > > should take patch 2 as well. > > Thanks for the heads up! Let me take patch 3 right now. s/patch 3/patch 2/ > I'm a bit unclear on where we landed with the parallel efforts to add > the >32b address support :(