From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1124CAC580 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2025 00:12:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=9IY5e/bi/IuFCjaNFAS6qOCicO0lRgzau7l0rYzHPtk=; b=OFuWhSSY5Km6wdzJvpPJQqj3x9 uIlCug8Bdlgr5yRvv4J0LwxYzl8ZoI5/EED5yXGhc4oKfsm1TK7GrLYBdB3QfsLB00Ybr3rmjxuaF EN9yevB6filfzUwnd7cLT1fKU9eyxoz/98Rs1Yln5xkB+WGLwoGcBOZFzdt73QthMmf9l1I1bnAF/ teXSXSWF2jhZk7CZf/tXuWElKi1nMMJFE9cPw5vMYJeXuqsaFZnVSg4882/3P4Io3hRo0pLstqsh1 EU049l4elOF+zTYw6F2iPcNc8Y/Vq5yhW7pmiIFBYKtgI/hUNjHLykGA/KoYTup/4nxHab8hxxydT Z2pnXI4w==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uugXh-00000005VhA-3hRZ; Sat, 06 Sep 2025 00:12:33 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([172.234.252.31]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uubiy-00000003zep-1VTh; Fri, 05 Sep 2025 19:03:53 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12E5F402DB; Fri, 5 Sep 2025 19:03:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B445C4CEF1; Fri, 5 Sep 2025 19:03:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1757099031; bh=qIzUbO/sBwBn9eM4w3lfY4+Ygc/NgXkLIDsWHrZsw7E=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=XRvttllvXeb50lo2c6avwb4bRJQ+NCYyMwYgaFiVlwGx0Z7FeRc+xYt2XXQtMEe03 8nHhvafQABC07nspDJXdU7tfIvVMbhV5mVcdmx29WGm8umdS5E1xTWqNwmFjcAWZXd 46FjguhS7QFjidiygR8Iq6nDdGt3sgN0STzYk9Ovo7R9y12m4Pd3wbq24CJD1CM8pB XTncANdPUBTgfUcqpe4tbbioRUYdZSiNVvUpX1skP5X+sl89HzaRi1UBVN5s0zEg2W 6hsJQe9v9xSlihdamw1et5v2LFUNB8WS4PVkEk1YU2BRq2GQkg3WnP2ZNFDeksjoQw eea5XLXldT2MA== Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2025 20:03:47 +0100 From: Conor Dooley To: Marek Vasut Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Broadcom internal kernel review list , Conor Dooley , Dave Stevenson , Florian Fainelli , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Rob Herring , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: dt-bindings: rpi-panel: Split 7" Raspberry Pi 720x1280 v2 binding Message-ID: <20250905-imaginary-crazy-a5734cb794fc@spud> References: <20250904200036.168222-1-marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org> <20250905-humble-framing-3d9b786c87a2@spud> <3ba2de63-4282-4b1e-a576-0b4501e56a7b@mailbox.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="usBmjWL10C9rXeNB" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3ba2de63-4282-4b1e-a576-0b4501e56a7b@mailbox.org> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250905_120352_416203_2C33A96F X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.12 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org --usBmjWL10C9rXeNB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Sep 05, 2025 at 08:55:16PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 9/5/25 8:46 PM, Conor Dooley wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > > > +examples: > > > + - | > > > + i2c { > > > + #address-cells =3D <1>; > > > + #size-cells =3D <0>; > > > + gpio@45 { > >=20 > > ngl, seems strange to classify the device as a regulator in directory > > and name, but use gpio as the node name in the example. > >=20 > > Otherwise, this seems fine - if you feel that the hardware is > > substantively differentially to what's in the "v1" regulator then > > keeping them apart is valid. > > Acked-by: Conor Dooley > I can rename it to "mcu@" or "mfd@" some such ? Sure. >=20 > I originally thought it could be compatible with the V1, which is why I > tried to conflate them into single binding in 6d09c6e474bd ("regulator: > dt-bindings: rpi-panel: Add regulator for 7" Raspberry Pi 720x1280") , but > they are too different, so this undoes the change and creates separate > binding. --usBmjWL10C9rXeNB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCaLs0EwAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0iY+APwLj1336PzN6WjULb9ViDkp1qnpKP4J2cicUnX08OB1iwD/XZpDBQy97xa3 JXXKMGD3tzx/lj6Cmg6vuuX/kd/xCQY= =kAJA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --usBmjWL10C9rXeNB--