linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 09/16] KVM: arm64: Report faults from S1 walk setup at the expected start level
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 12:44:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250915114451.660351-10-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250915114451.660351-1-maz@kernel.org>

Translation faults from TTBR must be reported on the start level,
and not level-0. Enforcing this requires moving quite a lot of
code around so that the start level can be computed early enough
that it is usable.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/at.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c
index fad9d7828d7b6..1230907d0aa0a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c
@@ -154,9 +154,6 @@ static int setup_s1_walk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct s1_walk_info *wi,
 
 	va55 = va & BIT(55);
 
-	if (wi->regime == TR_EL2 && va55)
-		goto addrsz;
-
 	wi->s2 = wi->regime == TR_EL10 && (hcr & (HCR_VM | HCR_DC));
 
 	switch (wi->regime) {
@@ -179,6 +176,46 @@ static int setup_s1_walk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct s1_walk_info *wi,
 		BUG();
 	}
 
+	/* Someone was silly enough to encode TG0/TG1 differently */
+	if (va55 && wi->regime != TR_EL2) {
+		wi->txsz = FIELD_GET(TCR_T1SZ_MASK, tcr);
+		tg = FIELD_GET(TCR_TG1_MASK, tcr);
+
+		switch (tg << TCR_TG1_SHIFT) {
+		case TCR_TG1_4K:
+			wi->pgshift = 12;	 break;
+		case TCR_TG1_16K:
+			wi->pgshift = 14;	 break;
+		case TCR_TG1_64K:
+		default:	    /* IMPDEF: treat any other value as 64k */
+			wi->pgshift = 16;	 break;
+		}
+	} else {
+		wi->txsz = FIELD_GET(TCR_T0SZ_MASK, tcr);
+		tg = FIELD_GET(TCR_TG0_MASK, tcr);
+
+		switch (tg << TCR_TG0_SHIFT) {
+		case TCR_TG0_4K:
+			wi->pgshift = 12;	 break;
+		case TCR_TG0_16K:
+			wi->pgshift = 14;	 break;
+		case TCR_TG0_64K:
+		default:	    /* IMPDEF: treat any other value as 64k */
+			wi->pgshift = 16;	 break;
+		}
+	}
+
+	wi->pa52bit = has_52bit_pa(vcpu, wi, tcr);
+
+	ia_bits = get_ia_size(wi);
+
+	/* AArch64.S1StartLevel() */
+	stride = wi->pgshift - 3;
+	wi->sl = 3 - (((ia_bits - 1) - wi->pgshift) / stride);
+
+	if (wi->regime == TR_EL2 && va55)
+		goto addrsz;
+
 	tbi = (wi->regime == TR_EL2 ?
 	       FIELD_GET(TCR_EL2_TBI, tcr) :
 	       (va55 ?
@@ -248,46 +285,15 @@ static int setup_s1_walk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct s1_walk_info *wi,
 	/* R_BVXDG */
 	wi->hpd |= (wi->poe || wi->e0poe);
 
-	/* Someone was silly enough to encode TG0/TG1 differently */
-	if (va55) {
-		wi->txsz = FIELD_GET(TCR_T1SZ_MASK, tcr);
-		tg = FIELD_GET(TCR_TG1_MASK, tcr);
-
-		switch (tg << TCR_TG1_SHIFT) {
-		case TCR_TG1_4K:
-			wi->pgshift = 12;	 break;
-		case TCR_TG1_16K:
-			wi->pgshift = 14;	 break;
-		case TCR_TG1_64K:
-		default:	    /* IMPDEF: treat any other value as 64k */
-			wi->pgshift = 16;	 break;
-		}
-	} else {
-		wi->txsz = FIELD_GET(TCR_T0SZ_MASK, tcr);
-		tg = FIELD_GET(TCR_TG0_MASK, tcr);
-
-		switch (tg << TCR_TG0_SHIFT) {
-		case TCR_TG0_4K:
-			wi->pgshift = 12;	 break;
-		case TCR_TG0_16K:
-			wi->pgshift = 14;	 break;
-		case TCR_TG0_64K:
-		default:	    /* IMPDEF: treat any other value as 64k */
-			wi->pgshift = 16;	 break;
-		}
-	}
-
 	/* R_PLCGL, R_YXNYW */
 	if (!kvm_has_feat_enum(vcpu->kvm, ID_AA64MMFR2_EL1, ST, 48_47)) {
 		if (wi->txsz > 39)
-			goto transfault_l0;
+			goto transfault;
 	} else {
 		if (wi->txsz > 48 || (BIT(wi->pgshift) == SZ_64K && wi->txsz > 47))
-			goto transfault_l0;
+			goto transfault;
 	}
 
-	wi->pa52bit = has_52bit_pa(vcpu, wi, tcr);
-
 	/* R_GTJBY, R_SXWGM */
 	switch (BIT(wi->pgshift)) {
 	case SZ_4K:
@@ -300,28 +306,22 @@ static int setup_s1_walk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct s1_walk_info *wi,
 	}
 
 	if ((lva && wi->txsz < 12) || (!lva && wi->txsz < 16))
-		goto transfault_l0;
-
-	ia_bits = get_ia_size(wi);
+		goto transfault;
 
 	/* R_YYVYV, I_THCZK */
 	if ((!va55 && va > GENMASK(ia_bits - 1, 0)) ||
 	    (va55 && va < GENMASK(63, ia_bits)))
-		goto transfault_l0;
+		goto transfault;
 
 	/* I_ZFSYQ */
 	if (wi->regime != TR_EL2 &&
 	    (tcr & (va55 ? TCR_EPD1_MASK : TCR_EPD0_MASK)))
-		goto transfault_l0;
+		goto transfault;
 
 	/* R_BNDVG and following statements */
 	if (kvm_has_feat(vcpu->kvm, ID_AA64MMFR2_EL1, E0PD, IMP) &&
 	    wi->as_el0 && (tcr & (va55 ? TCR_E0PD1 : TCR_E0PD0)))
-		goto transfault_l0;
-
-	/* AArch64.S1StartLevel() */
-	stride = wi->pgshift - 3;
-	wi->sl = 3 - (((ia_bits - 1) - wi->pgshift) / stride);
+		goto transfault;
 
 	ps = (wi->regime == TR_EL2 ?
 	      FIELD_GET(TCR_EL2_PS_MASK, tcr) : FIELD_GET(TCR_IPS_MASK, tcr));
@@ -351,12 +351,17 @@ static int setup_s1_walk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct s1_walk_info *wi,
 
 	return 0;
 
-addrsz:				/* Address Size Fault level 0 */
+addrsz:
+	/*
+	 * Address Size Fault level 0 to indicate it comes from TTBR.
+	 * yes, this is an oddity.
+	 */
 	fail_s1_walk(wr, ESR_ELx_FSC_ADDRSZ_L(0), false);
 	return -EFAULT;
 
-transfault_l0:			/* Translation Fault level 0 */
-	fail_s1_walk(wr, ESR_ELx_FSC_FAULT_L(0), false);
+transfault:
+	/* Translation Fault on start level */
+	fail_s1_walk(wr, ESR_ELx_FSC_FAULT_L(wi->sl), false);
 	return -EFAULT;
 }
 
-- 
2.39.2



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-15 11:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-15 11:44 [PATCH v2 00/16] KVM: arm64: TTW reporting on SEA and 52bit PA in S1 PTW Marc Zyngier
2025-09-15 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 01/16] KVM: arm64: Add helper computing the state of 52bit PA support Marc Zyngier
2025-09-15 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 02/16] KVM: arm64: Account for 52bit when computing maximum OA Marc Zyngier
2025-09-15 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 03/16] KVM: arm64: Compute 52bit TTBR address and alignment Marc Zyngier
2025-09-15 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 04/16] KVM: arm64: Decouple output address from the PT descriptor Marc Zyngier
2025-09-15 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 05/16] KVM: arm64: Pass the walk_info structure to compute_par_s1() Marc Zyngier
2025-09-15 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 06/16] KVM: arm64: Compute shareability for LPA2 Marc Zyngier
2025-09-19 21:58   ` Oliver Upton
2025-09-15 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 07/16] KVM: arm64: Populate PAR_EL1 with 52bit addresses Marc Zyngier
2025-09-19 22:00   ` Oliver Upton
2025-09-20  9:27     ` Marc Zyngier
2025-09-15 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 08/16] KVM: arm64: Expand valid block mappings to FEAT_LPA/LPA2 support Marc Zyngier
2025-09-15 11:44 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2025-09-15 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 10/16] KVM: arm64: Allow use of S1 PTW for non-NV vcpus Marc Zyngier
2025-09-19 22:27   ` Oliver Upton
2025-09-20  9:24     ` Marc Zyngier
2025-09-15 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 11/16] KVM: arm64: Allow EL1 control registers to be accessed from the CPU state Marc Zyngier
2025-09-15 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 12/16] KVM: arm64: Don't switch MMU on translation from non-NV context Marc Zyngier
2025-09-15 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 13/16] KVM: arm64: Add filtering hook to S1 page table walk Marc Zyngier
2025-09-15 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 14/16] KVM: arm64: Add S1 IPA to page table level walker Marc Zyngier
2025-09-19 22:31   ` Oliver Upton
2025-09-15 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 15/16] KVM: arm64: Populate level on S1PTW SEA injection Marc Zyngier
2025-09-15 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 16/16] KVM: arm64: selftest: Expand external_aborts test to look for TTW levels Marc Zyngier
2025-09-19 22:36   ` Oliver Upton
2025-09-19 22:37 ` [PATCH v2 00/16] KVM: arm64: TTW reporting on SEA and 52bit PA in S1 PTW Oliver Upton
2025-09-21 11:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2025-09-21 10:57 ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250915114451.660351-10-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).