From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] dma-mapping: remove unused mapping resource callbacks
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 15:19:39 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250916121939.GB82444@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <087c29da71fb41245b8c03f641f53d624be10d59.1758006942.git.leon@kernel.org>
On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 10:32:07AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
>
> After ARM conversion to use physical addresses for the mapping,
> there is no in-kernel users for map_resource/unmap_resource callbacks,
> so remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> ---
> include/linux/dma-map-ops.h | 6 ------
> kernel/dma/mapping.c | 16 ++++------------
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
This patch is premature, I missed another map_resource user in
drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c.
Thanks
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h b/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h
> index 25603cb273769..a2ec1566aa270 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h
> @@ -53,12 +53,6 @@ struct dma_map_ops {
> enum dma_data_direction dir, unsigned long attrs);
> void (*unmap_sg)(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg, int nents,
> enum dma_data_direction dir, unsigned long attrs);
> - dma_addr_t (*map_resource)(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t phys_addr,
> - size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir,
> - unsigned long attrs);
> - void (*unmap_resource)(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_handle,
> - size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir,
> - unsigned long attrs);
> void (*sync_single_for_cpu)(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_handle,
> size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir);
> void (*sync_single_for_device)(struct device *dev,
> diff --git a/kernel/dma/mapping.c b/kernel/dma/mapping.c
> index 4080aebe5debb..32a85bfdf873a 100644
> --- a/kernel/dma/mapping.c
> +++ b/kernel/dma/mapping.c
> @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ dma_addr_t dma_map_phys(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t phys, size_t size,
> {
> const struct dma_map_ops *ops = get_dma_ops(dev);
> bool is_mmio = attrs & DMA_ATTR_MMIO;
> - dma_addr_t addr;
> + dma_addr_t addr = DMA_MAPPING_ERROR;
>
> BUG_ON(!valid_dma_direction(dir));
>
> @@ -171,18 +171,13 @@ dma_addr_t dma_map_phys(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t phys, size_t size,
> addr = iommu_dma_map_phys(dev, phys, size, dir, attrs);
> else if (ops->map_phys)
> addr = ops->map_phys(dev, phys, size, dir, attrs);
> - else if (is_mmio) {
> - if (!ops->map_resource)
> - return DMA_MAPPING_ERROR;
> -
> - addr = ops->map_resource(dev, phys, size, dir, attrs);
> - } else {
> + else if (!is_mmio && ops->map_page) {
> struct page *page = phys_to_page(phys);
> size_t offset = offset_in_page(phys);
>
> /*
> * The dma_ops API contract for ops->map_page() requires
> - * kmappable memory, while ops->map_resource() does not.
> + * kmappable memory.
> */
> addr = ops->map_page(dev, page, offset, size, dir, attrs);
> }
> @@ -227,10 +222,7 @@ void dma_unmap_phys(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr, size_t size,
> iommu_dma_unmap_phys(dev, addr, size, dir, attrs);
> else if (ops->unmap_phys)
> ops->unmap_phys(dev, addr, size, dir, attrs);
> - else if (is_mmio) {
> - if (ops->unmap_resource)
> - ops->unmap_resource(dev, addr, size, dir, attrs);
> - } else
> + else
> ops->unmap_page(dev, addr, size, dir, attrs);
> trace_dma_unmap_phys(dev, addr, size, dir, attrs);
> debug_dma_unmap_phys(dev, addr, size, dir);
> --
> 2.51.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-16 12:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-16 7:32 [PATCH v3 0/4] Preparation to .map_page and .unmap_page removal Leon Romanovsky
2025-09-16 7:32 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] dma-mapping: prepare dma_map_ops to conversion to physical address Leon Romanovsky
2025-09-16 13:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-16 7:32 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] dma-mapping: convert dummy ops to physical address mapping Leon Romanovsky
2025-09-16 13:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-16 7:32 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] ARM: dma-mapping: Switch to physical address mapping callbacks Leon Romanovsky
2025-09-16 18:46 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-17 10:36 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-09-17 11:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-17 13:41 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-09-17 13:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-17 18:46 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-09-17 19:08 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-17 19:46 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-09-16 7:32 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] dma-mapping: remove unused mapping resource callbacks Leon Romanovsky
2025-09-16 12:19 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2025-09-16 18:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250916121939.GB82444@unreal \
--to=leonro@nvidia.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox