From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4681ECAC59A for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2025 21:21:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From: Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=loMy4TUif8ykaDI5FK6KRKdzewryzSo9NF7v0gGWyiQ=; b=TPcSHYwBMpvOgZs7lDkrz+Lhty 3dAfCrocGgmu+RUv7ftQMvg66LeWNimB7DU4RK6t+shZ6D12+YG+TMOkkSDAGCOxmXvhvdAO2LqTN jXWDd/K9SjQVSEdJZl4meQwS6DZn/y4bzHodMaiwjXJi4zCAQoYELp8v/6zM6e8WWRhd621+NbZ5H T6++9I50sfO3Owib6Zvjxpf7Fc7xtWN35UJg9c2FyuJEvi3u0y5cZYS4GGME+gIhMtVD4xdBUEsJ8 XneqQ5o9WtycEJ/BIebEht0kab0FX+L/UY0DfqfH0luk+W0ltRjQYSyWAhc+hr5gOlcPIZ6wmicgo LvbBZY/w==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uyzax-0000000Ernr-3sLO; Wed, 17 Sep 2025 21:21:43 +0000 Received: from out-186.mta1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:203:375::ba]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uyzat-0000000ErhL-0yho for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 17 Sep 2025 21:21:40 +0000 X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1758144096; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=loMy4TUif8ykaDI5FK6KRKdzewryzSo9NF7v0gGWyiQ=; b=hGuzkiCE37zZWKiNLcSTbrvIyvfllDCUQeghB17bTsvfJ+3j4Hj4a0IKn2uYjHxfdX/DDT nLGY+q3R819cm3YtduFoSw/aA40NKLUXCNpxeDeorlq4lsv8JxRQt/t9dFmKy9ESVovyBq 4wvh909sf/MJzD0dHMzrTk8ch9De/eM= From: Oliver Upton To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev Cc: Marc Zyngier , Joey Gouly , Suzuki K Poulose , Zenghui Yu , Paolo Bonzini , Sean Christopherson , Christian Borntraeger , Janosch Frank , Claudio Imbrenda , David Hildenbrand , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Oliver Upton Subject: [PATCH 07/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Provide helper for getting default vCPU target Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 14:20:37 -0700 Message-ID: <20250917212044.294760-8-oliver.upton@linux.dev> In-Reply-To: <20250917212044.294760-1-oliver.upton@linux.dev> References: <20250917212044.294760-1-oliver.upton@linux.dev> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250917_142139_438743_6E51F55F X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.17 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org The default vCPU target in KVM selftests is pretty boring in that it doesn't enable any vCPU features. Expose a helper for getting the default target to prepare for cramming in more features. Call KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET directly from get-reg-list as it needs fine-grained control over feature flags. Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/psci_test.c | 2 +- .../testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/smccc_filter.c | 2 +- .../selftests/kvm/arm64/vpmu_counter_access.c | 4 ++-- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c | 9 ++++++--- .../selftests/kvm/include/arm64/processor.h | 2 ++ .../testing/selftests/kvm/lib/arm64/processor.c | 17 +++++++++++------ 6 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/psci_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/psci_test.c index cf208390fd0e..0d4680da66d1 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/psci_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/psci_test.c @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static struct kvm_vm *setup_vm(void *guest_code, struct kvm_vcpu **source, vm = vm_create(2); - vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, &init); + kvm_get_default_vcpu_target(vm, &init); init.features[0] |= (1 << KVM_ARM_VCPU_PSCI_0_2); *source = aarch64_vcpu_add(vm, 0, &init, guest_code); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/smccc_filter.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/smccc_filter.c index eb5551d21dbe..a8e22d866ea7 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/smccc_filter.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/smccc_filter.c @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static struct kvm_vm *setup_vm(struct kvm_vcpu **vcpu) struct kvm_vm *vm; vm = vm_create(1); - vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, &init); + kvm_get_default_vcpu_target(vm, &init); /* * Enable in-kernel emulation of PSCI to ensure that calls are denied diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/vpmu_counter_access.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/vpmu_counter_access.c index 36a3a8b4e0b5..2a8f31c8e59f 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/vpmu_counter_access.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/vpmu_counter_access.c @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ static void create_vpmu_vm(void *guest_code) } /* Create vCPU with PMUv3 */ - vm_ioctl(vpmu_vm.vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, &init); + kvm_get_default_vcpu_target(vpmu_vm.vm, &init); init.features[0] |= (1 << KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3); vpmu_vm.vcpu = aarch64_vcpu_add(vpmu_vm.vm, 0, &init, guest_code); vcpu_init_descriptor_tables(vpmu_vm.vcpu); @@ -525,7 +525,7 @@ static void run_access_test(uint64_t pmcr_n) * Reset and re-initialize the vCPU, and run the guest code again to * check if PMCR_EL0.N is preserved. */ - vm_ioctl(vpmu_vm.vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, &init); + kvm_get_default_vcpu_target(vpmu_vm.vm, &init); init.features[0] |= (1 << KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3); aarch64_vcpu_setup(vcpu, &init); vcpu_init_descriptor_tables(vcpu); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c index 91f05f78e824..f4644c9d2d3b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c @@ -116,10 +116,13 @@ void __weak finalize_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vcpu_reg_list *c) } #ifdef __aarch64__ -static void prepare_vcpu_init(struct vcpu_reg_list *c, struct kvm_vcpu_init *init) +static void prepare_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vm *vm, struct vcpu_reg_list *c, + struct kvm_vcpu_init *init) { struct vcpu_reg_sublist *s; + vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, init); + for_each_sublist(c, s) if (s->capability) init->features[s->feature / 32] |= 1 << (s->feature % 32); @@ -127,10 +130,10 @@ static void prepare_vcpu_init(struct vcpu_reg_list *c, struct kvm_vcpu_init *ini static struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu_config_get_vcpu(struct vcpu_reg_list *c, struct kvm_vm *vm) { - struct kvm_vcpu_init init = { .target = -1, }; + struct kvm_vcpu_init init; struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; - prepare_vcpu_init(c, &init); + prepare_vcpu_init(vm, c, &init); vcpu = __vm_vcpu_add(vm, 0); aarch64_vcpu_setup(vcpu, &init); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/arm64/processor.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/arm64/processor.h index 5a4b29c1b965..87f50efed720 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/arm64/processor.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/arm64/processor.h @@ -357,4 +357,6 @@ static __always_inline u64 ctxt_reg_alias(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 encoding) return KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(alias); } +void kvm_get_default_vcpu_target(struct kvm_vm *vm, struct kvm_vcpu_init *init); + #endif /* SELFTEST_KVM_PROCESSOR_H */ diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/arm64/processor.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/arm64/processor.c index 311660a9f655..5ae65fefd48c 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/arm64/processor.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/arm64/processor.c @@ -267,19 +267,24 @@ void virt_arch_dump(FILE *stream, struct kvm_vm *vm, uint8_t indent) } } +void kvm_get_default_vcpu_target(struct kvm_vm *vm, struct kvm_vcpu_init *init) +{ + struct kvm_vcpu_init preferred = {}; + + vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, &preferred); + + *init = preferred; +} + void aarch64_vcpu_setup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_vcpu_init *init) { struct kvm_vcpu_init default_init = { .target = -1, }; struct kvm_vm *vm = vcpu->vm; uint64_t sctlr_el1, tcr_el1, ttbr0_el1; - if (!init) + if (!init) { + kvm_get_default_vcpu_target(vm, &default_init); init = &default_init; - - if (init->target == -1) { - struct kvm_vcpu_init preferred; - vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, &preferred); - init->target = preferred.target; } vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT, init); -- 2.47.3