From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E741ECAC597 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2025 08:01:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=nSISvEYJCPwsG5ggKGHhcw2MTJYZN4kF0UXpONe9GxA=; b=S/AYQNUxNfyM1v7vDh/YCmAdnw Y/tYPPIY2RMT4qraRQYQWAs2CM9UzEcXrDhDAzUOYLexErrJ/t50SELXgFlXsFHa1ry2uB76dEc2j FCO7HRxPIIWDdEVuhv2Cmg7xBDujt6UnH4FgA36mf1nBJKJOrUF/s/8Pnd04wTzm2FISwVFzMc8/8 3IGlmzLO/bKzf3cF78c6LoMMKk0LRkpAR4FN7/X2mZCgvwk2xpwxrzismPUKD6/YgCYpi4XTaGTIq DipXM+WDtJChDQB9vyOM82p+DcLhJTMGBKTws4Lh0+y59PH/QM1RUkgNvqQkOpTBI69Fq3g9CCCaX jfu0MGyQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uz9ZY-0000000Gd54-2uN8; Thu, 18 Sep 2025 08:00:56 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c04:e001:324:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uz9ZX-0000000Gd4d-38bW for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 18 Sep 2025 08:00:55 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D1436020F; Thu, 18 Sep 2025 08:00:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6726DC4CEE7; Thu, 18 Sep 2025 08:00:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1758182454; bh=UnpotEpeySTaAPvBTlkT9xkPJHNwbR/FKxEvGWp576w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=uwwXpzntZf8uB1J7sJ0fpwoZix7C/qnx3C/XU2TmmmkX9S4UEXogZFY9B9rliQ986 xE25OkbK1EEaaolpFVhK4A9YZ3zctIFfix1Vxabvbew0JC+NBPAAffH0KEVNhbgyqC 7zzNFEOjzYR1t6Bo6TWMDe6YeIoQAlzHyCra4bH0= Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 10:00:51 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Yunhui Cui Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com, rafael@kernel.org, dakr@kernel.org, beata.michalska@arm.com, sumitg@nvidia.com, ptsm@linux.microsoft.com, yangyicong@hisilicon.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arch_topology: move parse_acpi_topology() to common code Message-ID: <2025091837-overload-fraction-b2bb@gregkh> References: <20250918014828.78383-1-cuiyunhui@bytedance.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250918014828.78383-1-cuiyunhui@bytedance.com> X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 09:48:28AM +0800, Yunhui Cui wrote: > Currently, RISC-V lacks arch-specific registers for CPU topology > properties and must get them from ACPI. Thus, parse_acpi_topology() > is moved from arm64/ to drivers/ for RISC-V reuse. > > Signed-off-by: Yunhui Cui > --- > arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 87 +--------------------------------- > drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > include/linux/arch_topology.h | 1 + > 3 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-) > Hi, This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux kernel tree. You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s) as indicated below: - This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version. Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what needs to be done here to properly describe this. If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received from other developers. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot