From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D68BCAC5A5 for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2025 11:34:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=4+IOH6dQuWOD3Ie72CVJwyAHhq3krexKTz7aMeHSQgs=; b=VcT3MMLqviyvGhl4ZimLbwhXC8 5uKrYUlixhpmSl9EQ1PCUYfpF6cHF91HhC4SOXwNpA8zOU0VAaOwQ8PwxcOTdV6gJixzosjVcI4M2 xibLZ1bAKygiHrYTq1/5JIXnA1osH6t8TAytKNdkxw/HJCDAqpOi2ImcGKHH5IjngNi8H8Q3RjU6Q IOnbp73X9PVcoyDPYAKQRxbzbUoDR0EgBh2GNDqcfe5aYa6skli9s2LHeu3BETUPjB5U7F1pRdgFQ XGbDrqfXioZYryOltRX6xmWmlD0Nmvq8aYdA4chZwnuizrCn8xluLU4XTvjJ8e+dzNTVHawly5zWp /8PAP64A==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1v1kEy-00000008YnG-1qYH; Thu, 25 Sep 2025 11:34:24 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([172.105.4.254]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1v1kEw-00000008Ym0-1fuW for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 25 Sep 2025 11:34:22 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFBB760516; Thu, 25 Sep 2025 11:34:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4C66BC113CF; Thu, 25 Sep 2025 11:34:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1758800061; bh=ToDFatLMxcooz/Q3OYrcJoGIlf1v4yNR2bbGcNdcIJs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=PsHBGqDMQeIX4YknUdxKSPDWqGcUvidkg+rT540MJzLhQSdpux4mJa/btTSTwxr0p 42LyXcB0+KTzq/K/X9BCrQaa1MPQn+CwIPIF1EN5iJVSCCwArllqj6nxYe0C4ikM5b UMCNH3nznG1dlWbuoqVSgntdCF8tMRG2ORBeQHmvpOhIukEM9keS81o7gBMXFVRZ/X UqRFpiN2/rBanaJtrsv92V6k1cfowhkzD0TxlZGdCPhUNQaldY/6LGMdpuKohlv+by jXbzkUQIKj5LhrDFx87CgkDyYNXnaWqYRpDztgs1sPac+fuC9QOexsgYCncSRQMUwm a+qdOhj0hTNqw== Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 12:34:15 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Michael Walle Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Davis , Nishanth Menon , Vignesh Raghavendra , Tero Kristo , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Jean Delvare , Guenter Roeck , Srinivas Kandagatla , Wim Van Sebroeck Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Initial Kontron SMARC-sAM67 support Message-ID: <20250925113415.GD8757@google.com> References: <20250912120745.2295115-1-mwalle@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, 25 Sep 2025, Michael Walle wrote: > Hi Lee, > > On Fri Sep 12, 2025 at 2:07 PM CEST, Michael Walle wrote: > > Now that the PMIC support is there, we can finally, upstream the > > support for this board. Besides the usual device tree, this > > patchset contains the support for the on-board house keeping MCU. It > > make extensive reuse of the drivers for the former SMARC-sAL28 > > board. Besides different hwmon sensors, all the dt binding patches > > will just add a board specific compatible (in addition to the old > > sl28 compatible) to make any future board specific quirks possible. > > > > I'm aware that there is a patch [1] which moves the sl28cpld MFD > > schema to a different directory. Once that patch is merged, I'll > > repost this series. But I already want to get some early feedback. > > > > v2: > > - dropped patches which were already picked up > > - new patch "dt-bindings: mfd: tps6594: allow gpio-line-names" > > - separate driver for the hwmon, add missing hwmon documentation, > > thanks Guenter > > - split the DT as suggested by the SoC maintainers > > - add missing copyright and license to the overlays, thanks Andrew > > > > Michael Walle (7): > > dt-bindings: arm: ti: Add Kontron SMARC-sAM67 module > > dt-bindings: mfd: tps6594: allow gpio-line-names > > arm64: dts: ti: Add support for Kontron SMARC-sAM67 > > dt-bindings: hwmon: sl28cpld: add sa67mcu compatible > > dt-bindings: watchdog: add SMARC-sAM67 support > > hwmon: add SMARC-sAM67 support > > arm64: dts: ti: sa67: add on-board management controller node > > Would you take these two patches > dt-bindings: mfd: tps6594: allow gpio-line-names > dt-bindings: watchdog: add SMARC-sAM67 support > > through the MFD tree this cycle? If they make it in, there wouldn't > be any more dependencies for the next cycle for the actual device > tree. Applied both, thanks. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]