From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo@foss.st.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Christophe Roullier <christophe.roullier@foss.st.com>,
Fabien Dessenne <fabien.dessenne@foss.st.com>,
Valentin Caron <valentin.caron@foss.st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/10] dt-bindings: pincfg-node: Add properties 'skew-delay-{in,out}put'
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 20:39:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251014-water-gown-11558c4eabe7@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdZT20cdH+G6Gjw8PopAkir+gGgMtRR4pkjnXFrmDkdfog@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3160 bytes --]
On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 09:33:14PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 8:04 PM Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 04:04:43PM +0200, Antonio Borneo wrote:
>
> > > + skew-delay-input:
> > > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> > > + description:
> > > + this affects the expected clock skew on input pins.
> > > + Typically indicates how many double-inverters are used to
> > > + delay the signal.
> >
> > This property seems to be temporal, I would expect to see a unit of time
> > mentioned here, otherwise it'll totally inconsistent in use between
> > devices, and also a standard unit suffix in the property name.
> > pw-bot: changes-requested
>
> Don't blame the messenger, the existing property skew-delay
> says:
>
> skew-delay:
> $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> description:
> this affects the expected clock skew on input pins
> and the delay before latching a value to an output
> pin. Typically indicates how many double-inverters are
> used to delay the signal.
>
> This in turn comes from the original
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-bindings.txt
> document, which in turn comes from this commit:
>
> commit e0e1e39de490a2d9b8a173363ccf2415ddada871
> Author: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> Date: Sat Oct 28 15:37:17 2017 +0200
>
> pinctrl: Add skew-delay pin config and bindings
>
> Some pin controllers (such as the Gemini) can control the
> expected clock skew and output delay on certain pins with a
> sub-nanosecond granularity. This is typically done by shunting
> in a number of double inverters in front of or behind the pin.
> Make it possible to configure this with a generic binding.
>
> Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> Acked-by: Hans Ulli Kroll <ulli.kroll@googlemail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>
> So by legacy skew-delay is a custom format, usually the number of
> (double) inverters.
Yeah, I actually noticed this after sending the mail. But as you say
below, the new properties can be done with a unit etc
>
> I don't recall the reason for this way of defining things, but one reason
> could be that the skew-delay incurred by two inverters is very
> dependent on the production node of the silicon, and can be
> nanoseconds or picoseconds, these days mostly picoseconds.
> Example: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/adi,adin.yaml
>
> Antonio, what do you say? Do you have the actual skew picosecond
> values for the different settings so we could define this as
>
> skew-delay-input-ps:
> skew-delay-output-ps:
>
> and translate it to the right register values in the driver?
The patch for the specific binding does have values in units of seconds
assigned to each register value, so I think this should be doable.
>
> If we have the proper data this could be a good time to add this
> ISO unit to these two props.
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-14 19:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-14 14:04 [PATCH v3 00/10] pinctrl: stm32: Support I/O synchronization Antonio Borneo
2025-10-14 14:04 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] pinctrl: pinconf-generic: Add properties 'skew-delay-{in,out}put' Antonio Borneo
2025-10-14 14:04 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] dt-bindings: pincfg-node: " Antonio Borneo
2025-10-14 18:04 ` Conor Dooley
2025-10-14 19:33 ` Linus Walleij
2025-10-14 19:39 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2025-10-15 12:52 ` Antonio Borneo
2025-10-16 22:34 ` Linus Walleij
2025-10-15 16:37 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-10-16 22:41 ` Linus Walleij
2025-10-14 14:04 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] pinctrl: stm32: Rework stm32_pconf_parse_conf() Antonio Borneo
2025-10-14 14:04 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] pinctrl: stm32: Simplify handling of backup pin status Antonio Borneo
2025-10-14 14:04 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] pinctrl: stm32: Drop useless spinlock save and restore Antonio Borneo
2025-10-14 14:04 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] pinctrl: stm32: Avoid keeping a bool value in a u32 variable Antonio Borneo
2025-10-14 14:04 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] pinctrl: stm32: Support I/O synchronization parameters Antonio Borneo
2025-10-14 14:04 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] dt-bindings: pinctrl: stm32: Use properties from pincfg-node.yaml Antonio Borneo
2025-10-14 18:05 ` Conor Dooley
2025-10-14 14:04 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] dt-bindings: pinctrl: stm32: Support I/O synchronization parameters Antonio Borneo
2025-10-14 18:10 ` Conor Dooley
2025-10-15 12:56 ` Antonio Borneo
2025-10-15 14:35 ` Conor Dooley
2025-10-20 15:09 ` Antonio Borneo
2025-10-20 22:08 ` Linus Walleij
2025-10-21 11:49 ` Antonio Borneo
2025-10-21 12:26 ` Linus Walleij
2025-10-14 14:04 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] arm64: dts: st: Add I/O sync to eth pinctrl in stm32mp25-pinctrl.dtsi Antonio Borneo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251014-water-gown-11558c4eabe7@spud \
--to=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=antonio.borneo@foss.st.com \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=christophe.roullier@foss.st.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=fabien.dessenne@foss.st.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=valentin.caron@foss.st.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox