From: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>
To: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
Cc: "Alexandre Torgue" <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
"Jose Abreu" <joabreu@synopsys.com>,
"Andrew Lunn" <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
davem@davemloft.net, "Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Maxime Coquelin" <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
"Richard Cochran" <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"Alexis Lothoré" <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>,
"Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] net: stmmac: Add support for coarse timestamping
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 14:55:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251015145519.280b6263@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251015102725.1297985-1-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
On Wed, 15 Oct 2025 12:27:20 +0200
Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> This is another attempt to support the fine vs coarse timestamping modes
> in stmmac.
>
> This mode allows trading off PTP clock frequency adjustment precision
> versus timestamping precision.
>
> In coarse mode, we lose the ability to fine-tune the PTP clock
> frequency, but get better timestamping precision instead. This is
> especially useful when acting as a PTP Grand Master, where the PTP clock
> in sync'd to a high-precision GPS clock through PPS inputs.
>
> This has been submitted before as a dedicated ioctl() back in 2020 [1].
> Since then, we now have a better representation of timestamp providers
> with a dedicated qualifier (approx vs precise).
>
> This series attempts to map these new qualifiers to stmmac's
> timestamping modes, see patch 2 for details.
>
> The main drawback IMO is that the qualifiers don't map very well to our
> timestamping modes, as the "approx" qualifier actually maps to stmmac's
> "coars" mode, but we actually gain in timestamping precision (while
> losing frequency precision).
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.17.1/source/include/uapi/linux/net_tstamp.h#L16
"approx" was initially added for DMA timestamp point.
Maybe we should add a new enum value here with a more suitable name.
Regards,
--
Köry Maincent, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-15 12:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-15 10:27 [PATCH net-next 0/3] net: stmmac: Add support for coarse timestamping Maxime Chevallier
2025-10-15 10:27 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: stmmac: Move subsecond increment configuration in dedicated helper Maxime Chevallier
2025-10-15 15:06 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-10-15 16:20 ` Maxime Chevallier
2025-10-15 17:20 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-10-15 10:27 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] net: stmmac: Allow supporting coarse adjustment mode Maxime Chevallier
2025-10-18 1:23 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-10-18 7:42 ` Maxime Chevallier
2025-10-20 9:00 ` Kory Maincent
2025-10-20 9:32 ` Maxime Chevallier
2025-10-20 12:52 ` Kory Maincent
2025-10-21 1:03 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-10-21 8:02 ` Maxime Chevallier
2025-10-21 23:02 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-10-23 8:29 ` Maxime Chevallier
2025-10-23 8:35 ` Kory Maincent
2025-10-15 10:27 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: ethtool: tsconfig: Re-configure hwtstamp upon provider change Maxime Chevallier
2025-10-15 12:45 ` Kory Maincent
2025-10-16 8:01 ` Maxime Chevallier
2025-10-16 8:44 ` Kory Maincent
2025-10-16 8:53 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-10-15 12:55 ` Kory Maincent [this message]
2025-10-16 8:14 ` [PATCH net-next 0/3] net: stmmac: Add support for coarse timestamping Maxime Chevallier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251015145519.280b6263@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390 \
--to=kory.maincent@bootlin.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=alexis.lothore@bootlin.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=joabreu@synopsys.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox