From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D6CFCCD1A7 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2025 06:10:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Owner; bh=v3wtCgrKpXpY06IA1iepJUf0jmIsp0liDp9ZApSd2Z8=; b=Drj6z8Q8Q0WAiAxMOl0wXLcdJ8 Vm/t9xL8C/0+ydAmG6lhK1S23N+dgMJM/HFNIHiluWo3pn1452x133Q9Gg4p25qxHdHfYNLrP9WFs ZPmyBRYMda9fmEI9Ie+9y48TfFHA95nbd8zZM7uQvaZ4WMeTL1oSuNbAc4b7RQBXwiagGZn3ceaAd lYiI9fw1swGdAXLDP05aTNwb2k0CW1TJ0TrrnVNl19DghsT9gJUcOIl4IzUFNO3cZ+lksOYDYSnZH wz7+0Q4XKoBwpJSrPoz2FldETI4XkbcvgjHYuLXWIxQWy0cmI6mN5o5KgO1kwQWgiZBivCMQgBldy PwPVHGVQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vAj6S-0000000BzLU-3Lld; Mon, 20 Oct 2025 06:10:44 +0000 Received: from zeus03.de ([194.117.254.33] helo=mail.zeus03.de) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vAj6L-0000000BzHJ-3jh4 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2025 06:10:40 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; s=k1; bh=v3wtCgrKpXpY06 IA1iepJUf0jmIsp0liDp9ZApSd2Z8=; b=RcAlToUCuHt6nQyz8co6yRNGfUNVuA 8UzaTOqAm+ZiKuYB6NvSL17xZZHja1eptPR9iXoEYQBGPdQC3sXqxoudg+VG9Gmv OxUSs4rwvpAAgGWj9GHbiy3mt5o3RLhYbpUAGKNgwuIxrnOf9s1PQVJFGAPWouwS B45m5DP9YiELKZ+xmtYQlTFsLRSEfyPp6EDndXCiaT5lRfuDe1cmcokUmxi1OUQK KRBi4E6z51+bIw8ljzVmThRm8I7SANs4R3Pymh4pKIU88x+vIlSE29oX8FH3V4vP 3UB8yZtXWU+4F5Dt5qQ7k1mIgouCg4AvmpmdWAXvteCVTfOmyVNzKRew== Received: (qmail 940898 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2025 08:10:25 +0200 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with UTF8SMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 20 Oct 2025 08:10:25 +0200 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@9Ldn8JBB9LkgAwDNf0fPAEuMhp6AgTGK From: Wolfram Sang To: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Cc: Wolfram Sang , Alexandre Torgue , Chen-Yu Tsai , Conor Dooley , Fabio Estevam , Fabrice Gasnier , Gatien Chevallier , imx@lists.linux.dev, Jernej Skrabec , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Liam Girdwood , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, Liu Ying , Mark Brown , Maxime Coquelin , Maxime Ripard , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Rob Herring , Samuel Holland , Sascha Hauer , Shawn Guo , Srinivas Kandagatla Subject: [PATCH 0/4] dt-bindings: treewide: don't check node names Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 08:09:49 +0200 Message-ID: <20251020060951.30776-6-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20251019_231038_778880_063A05BF X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.42 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Node names are already and properly checked by the core schema. No need to do it again. These are all occurrences I found in linux-next as of 20251015. I did run dt_bindings_check successfully. I haven't done a way to run dtbs_check yet because I would need to identify the proper architecture first, right? Is there some tool which tests all DTs of a certain binding? At least build bot is happy, I don't know if it checks DTs as well, though. I'd suggest to give subsystems some time to pick these patches before Rob applies the remaining ones? Wolfram Sang (4): dt-bindings: bus: don't check node names dt-bindings: nvmem: don't check node names ASoC: dt-bindings: don't check node names dt-bindings: spi: don't check node names .../devicetree/bindings/bus/allwinner,sun8i-a23-rsb.yaml | 2 +- .../devicetree/bindings/bus/fsl,imx8qxp-pixel-link-msi-bus.yaml | 2 +- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/st,stm32-etzpc.yaml | 2 +- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/st,stm32mp25-rifsc.yaml | 2 +- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/st,stm32-romem.yaml | 2 +- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/qcom,wcd934x.yaml | 2 +- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml | 2 +- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-controller.yaml | 2 +- 8 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) -- 2.47.2