From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF769CCD1AB for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 07:56:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=Hw8axk8L0LiGYZ9BbA/74Y3kxYyeDWvD8iGv4yL1a8U=; b=rbWeWgllh/qV7LMSZsHhiR7uqy YXCUctjt0USgcRImuzxtZQMYODI9TJkccHJsE04kwER5RbV4LzVFx1b1hq65mNIMLuj6yh4orbuUj kmo+y5PUqfJTsCWSEEG/Z5cwRoJFn3ehcPRgL0V1scLwBNW9C4RX9RuFfEIwU+6uHgHsqbw4QBl5Q K90W1vb/WIiKIUXCZid2iNPVb+/jPbeVhnLwzDfw8yqipFDaNKw1yX3/ghyRPAa+BnvOqXMp788eN iRP/3XBnuG4vyNLaPhi9lL9II5H+8tdQm4A0Ff4+sar+Ag8C2U2g2QfPMYJmZ2+ALStzZ1gOdYDz0 x2lkX8+Q==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vBThw-00000001y1K-41PL; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 07:56:32 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c0a:e001:78e:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vBTht-00000001y0r-3p1f for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 07:56:31 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 341564453B; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 07:56:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A7802C4CEF5; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 07:56:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1761119789; bh=xwEauBPEHJrofe1MoLxXmJ4AZ4uBT0GSA7wT/TN6xso=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Ycu3NBZljVs6uSEdPzZQx01UnpxSg8des4ZxUjbESf/JCfjShD5hjY1BnO7bQPcxr FXcrDkKWfEBH3ldYc0V792BrueZ+zXQUKvhdKQoI3iHnLBLcoV9V7qm8dnz6XENWjq 7LJzMb3SvLSo7W5vjh4p5U2pj87CvbDNUTaWg7L+fER8Nek94/XvBNxaGUrlDVWadA VP2FRMB9piQYUgP95kJQuh3/hMjI5kpgbhE1lLqkAmbP1YtzCdcWuRCn4ykTqf3cNl QSZeFsp+moMgkWCQCeuvg82BPwCg4wlHm6Agf0SR9qcffnQABmEABOeNr8AeOq+BuA K/pyDbcemR8Ww== Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 09:56:26 +0200 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Ivaylo Ivanov Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki , Chanwoo Choi , Alim Akhtar , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Rob Herring , Conor Dooley , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Peter Griffin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] clk: samsung: introduce exynos8890 clock driver Message-ID: <20251022-savvy-sly-auk-a60073@kuoka> References: <20251017161334.1295955-1-ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com> <20251017161334.1295955-6-ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251017161334.1295955-6-ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20251022_005630_009606_415197E7 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.04 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 07:13:33PM +0300, Ivaylo Ivanov wrote: > Introduce a clocks management driver for exynos8890, providing clocks > for the peripherals of that SoC. > > As exynos8890 is the first exynos SoC to feature Hardware Auto Clock > Gating (HWACG), it differs from newer SoCs. Q-channel and Q-state bits > are separate registers, unlike the CLK_CON_GAT_* ones that feature HWACG > bits in the same register that controls manual gating. Hence, don't use > the clk-exynos-arm64 helper, but implement logic that enforces manual > gating. Please CC @Peter Griffin in future versions. How much of this can be shared between this and GS101? https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251013-automatic-clocks-v1-0-72851ee00300@linaro.org/ Best regards, Krzysztof