From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
patches@lists.linux.dev,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.17 050/184] arm64, mm: avoid always making PTE dirty in pte_mkwrite()
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 19:35:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251027183516.248198636@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251027183514.934710872@linuxfoundation.org>
6.17-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com>
[ Upstream commit 143937ca51cc6ae2fccc61a1cb916abb24cd34f5 ]
Current pte_mkwrite_novma() makes PTE dirty unconditionally. This may
mark some pages that are never written dirty wrongly. For example,
do_swap_page() may map the exclusive pages with writable and clean PTEs
if the VMA is writable and the page fault is for read access.
However, current pte_mkwrite_novma() implementation always dirties the
PTE. This may cause unnecessary disk writing if the pages are
never written before being reclaimed.
So, change pte_mkwrite_novma() to clear the PTE_RDONLY bit only if the
PTE_DIRTY bit is set to make it possible to make the PTE writable and
clean.
The current behavior was introduced in commit 73e86cb03cf2 ("arm64:
Move PTE_RDONLY bit handling out of set_pte_at()"). Before that,
pte_mkwrite() only sets the PTE_WRITE bit, while set_pte_at() only
clears the PTE_RDONLY bit if both the PTE_WRITE and the PTE_DIRTY bits
are set.
To test the performance impact of the patch, on an arm64 server
machine, run 16 redis-server processes on socket 1 and 16
memtier_benchmark processes on socket 0 with mostly get
transactions (that is, redis-server will mostly read memory only).
The memory footprint of redis-server is larger than the available
memory, so swap out/in will be triggered. Test results show that the
patch can avoid most swapping out because the pages are mostly clean.
And the benchmark throughput improves ~23.9% in the test.
Fixes: 73e86cb03cf2 ("arm64: Move PTE_RDONLY bit handling out of set_pte_at()")
Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
index abd2dee416b3b..e6fdb52963303 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -293,7 +293,8 @@ static inline pmd_t set_pmd_bit(pmd_t pmd, pgprot_t prot)
static inline pte_t pte_mkwrite_novma(pte_t pte)
{
pte = set_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(PTE_WRITE));
- pte = clear_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(PTE_RDONLY));
+ if (pte_sw_dirty(pte))
+ pte = clear_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(PTE_RDONLY));
return pte;
}
--
2.51.0
parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-27 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <20251027183514.934710872@linuxfoundation.org>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251027183516.248198636@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
--cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).