From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
paulmck@kernel.org, mhiramat@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: arm64: pseudo NMI bootconfig question
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 13:34:03 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251113133403.308046d2df1c97ba7dcd2388@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <rs4igmsjrm6r2aio4nbe5jos3vcqk2u4bjhltjwtj2pn3cquip@kv3grgec7qrb>
On Wed, 12 Nov 2025 06:05:43 -0800
Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In most major Linux distributions, it’s common to have a separate debug kernel
> build. This variant is compiled with additional debug configuration options to
> provide deeper observability and easier debugging, typically at the expense of
> some performance.
>
> This approach is also used in several companies, including mine. The debug
> flavor is usually a drop-in replacement deployed when investigating
> issues, allowing quicker identification before more detailed manual
> debugging.
>
> I’m currently debugging some hung tasks using the debug kernel flavor and
> noticed that backtraces weren’t printed correctly because PSEUDO NMI isn’t
> enabled.
>
> AFAIK, to enable PSEUDO NMI on ARM, the following are required:
>
> cmdline: irqchip.gicv3_pseudo_nmi=1
> config: CONFIG_ARM64_PSEUDO_NMI=y
>
> I wanted to have pseudo NMI enabled by default in the debug kernel
> (without relying on kernel command-line parameters), but this isn’t
> possible today. The reason is that `irqchip.gicv3_pseudo_nmi` is an early
> parameter, which can’t be set through bootconfig, so, independent of my
> .config, I need to hack cmdline arguments to have the debuggability
> I need.
Yeah, that parameter is for early architecture initialization,
which is done before parsing bootconfig.
Can you try building kernel with:
(arm)
CONFIG_CMDLINE="irqchip.gicv3_pseudo_nmi=1"
CONFIG_CMDLINE_EXTEND=y
(arm64)
cmdline=$(cat /proc/cmdline)
CONFIG_CMDLINE="irqchip.gicv3_pseudo_nmi=1 ${cmdline}"
CMDLINE_FORCE=y
BTW I wonder why you can not configure your bootloader to pass it.
Thank you,
>
> Question:
>
> Would it make sense to provide an option to enable pseudo NMI in certain
> kernel configuration without requiring an extra command-line parameter?
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-13 4:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-12 14:05 arm64: pseudo NMI bootconfig question Breno Leitao
2025-11-12 14:21 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-11-13 9:36 ` Breno Leitao
2025-11-13 11:03 ` Will Deacon
2025-11-13 4:34 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2025-11-13 10:37 ` Breno Leitao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251113133403.308046d2df1c97ba7dcd2388@kernel.org \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).