From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB574CFC29A for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2025 18:44:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=c0Lat5Lybgmydvmco3yn5fpGeDyEHrPo9zBkU69PSlI=; b=XGoyNrbauAqu781ddTMpORkBge kH89OYKx/n43vx1HpM7IOLSHK3I8TOz5AsDzsDhjDF7Y38XMiQAzmAgnvbZZiQPKCEOBFLFLkzsfi C3LU6BBJJswQIXYsgN9RH3WnxXNTjfSKi+NYIeqEyQPBDnTK+p3dYQAVfByY892o8lXwE0DWZplws Xe79VIVwowQOkLVLUF0pSs6ZtyfeB2oYqARy7PfwemASUdzEUO5Mk+NKLSwMTsKVGZWi2m5unmRK7 dvzigljlj1EaQMRpxpChCAqYvhNQV5ihUrlsUkGKN8TD0xxz9fSuMi3hbZrjXjeZOqbEBOxkS+aIP zxKP4mFg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vMW7G-00000008rmU-19EZ; Fri, 21 Nov 2025 18:44:18 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([172.105.4.254]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vMW7E-00000008rmF-2ali for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2025 18:44:16 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CABD9601CE; Fri, 21 Nov 2025 18:44:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A6399C4CEF1; Fri, 21 Nov 2025 18:44:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1763750655; bh=er1DOqN8XKcwmjh5oTWZ/2giUJo2yI7UZQbBBDHtzOg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=PU3Ev8qFEy/Hh4XsuOCwhFbtwDbMICtrEXQqAsONV5fPTQJ5vgQXYcIm36g/oCKBv U+Mx7JTGyPjfl7ibI+7Lt1bXC8XV0CTbVhZm9FQ6C3jlREEOJDBXA4jHjn9EtIvr7C 9MvQafAR6I1F6lfQ3XAixPTtlTBxEgdMlCgJn1LrLiI+PmcbqwiSEtsim+96u0JxpS UmlQZYDL2dzl9/n4F36jhAlAP/cDz186yVz7/zG4VFJk+kAPZamoTpGSVPLC6xXJix ELaiTDl4URgiY8liHpe4GYYAK4ef+lUVZcGIme299td0m/ZhNf9vdDWI0Z9RDNi4i+ +PRwwOT+TjhMw== Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 18:44:11 +0000 From: Conor Dooley To: Jonathan Cameron Cc: Randy Dunlap , Catalin Marinas , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Conor Dooley , Will Deacon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , wangyushan12@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] arm64, lib: make ARM64 select ARCH_HAS_CPU_CACHE_INVALIDATE_MEMREGION not GENERIC_CPU_CACHE_MAINTENANCE Message-ID: <20251121-uncoated-trapeze-e1e7d9c0cbb8@spud> References: <20251119-zippy-distinct-1e2a7da7b69b@spud> <20251120-ruined-liability-9ecbf53affd1@spud> <669d4bbb-4011-493c-b056-34e682a1ac26@infradead.org> <20251121104827.00005033@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/1G6JnR6SY9eI9zl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251121104827.00005033@huawei.com> X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org --/1G6JnR6SY9eI9zl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 21, 2025 at 10:48:27AM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Thu, 20 Nov 2025 15:25:46 -0800 > Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 11/20/25 1:40 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > > As an alternative, I'm happy for arm64 to select both the ARCH and > > > GENERIC options if you think that works better. > > > =20 > >=20 > > Yes, I think that would be much better. > > Thanks. > >=20 >=20 > I'm fine with that as well (was where we were in earlier versions). > I'm offline for 10 days from tomorrow, but wangyushan +CC has been heavily > involved in this series throughout if we need to test anything etc. >=20 > For a patch that is basically just (this to me seems fine to squash > as well if that is easier) Right, 3 votes for both, so I squashed that in. Thanks guys. --/1G6JnR6SY9eI9zl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCaSCy+wAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0hf3AP49RJTktKwmPiJYJH0F7CQBkBz2DLxIykNLJ5LyitA9OgD/TybjvGMP8lSU CnHl/S5msYsThe2KBHhzYGDR4gMRKwo= =4J2T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/1G6JnR6SY9eI9zl--