linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
	will@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, joro@8bytes.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, skolothumtho@nvidia.com,
	praan@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH rc v1 1/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add ignored bits to fix STE update sequence
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2025 15:38:30 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251206193830.GF1219718@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1af0f768-4b3d-47a3-b59b-c56f034b1d1b@linux.alibaba.com>

On Sat, Dec 06, 2025 at 10:19:08PM +0800, Shuai Xue wrote:
> Instead of modifying the calculation logic, would it be cleaner to keep
> the original arm_smmu_get_ste_used() semantics intact and simply exclude
> ignored bits from cur_used after obtaining them?

I'm OK with this idea

Jason


  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-06 19:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-06  0:51 [PATCH rc v1 0/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix hitless STE update in nesting cases Nicolin Chen
2025-12-06  0:52 ` [PATCH rc v1 1/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add ignored bits to fix STE update sequence Nicolin Chen
2025-12-06 14:19   ` Shuai Xue
2025-12-06 19:38     ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2025-12-06 19:34   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-12-06 19:45     ` Nicolin Chen
2025-12-06 19:57       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-12-07  4:37         ` Nicolin Chen
2025-12-07 16:09           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-12-07 19:35             ` Nicolin Chen
2025-12-07 20:11               ` Nicolin Chen
2025-12-06  0:52 ` [PATCH rc v1 2/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Ignore STE MEV when computing the " Nicolin Chen
2025-12-06  0:52 ` [PATCH rc v1 3/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Ignore STE EATS " Nicolin Chen
2025-12-06 19:46   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-12-06 19:54     ` Nicolin Chen
2025-12-06  0:52 ` [PATCH rc v1 4/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-test: Add nested s1bypass coverage Nicolin Chen
2025-12-06 12:34   ` Shuai Xue
2025-12-06 19:42     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-12-06 19:50     ` Nicolin Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251206193830.GF1219718@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=praan@google.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=skolothumtho@nvidia.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).