From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
To: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>
Cc: "Sandy Huang" <hjc@rock-chips.com>,
"Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"Andy Yan" <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
"Chaoyi Chen" <chaoyi.chen@rock-chips.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Daniel Stone" <daniels@collabora.com>,
kernel@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] drm/rockchip: vop2: Switch impossible pos conditional to WARN_ON
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2025 22:41:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251211224102.5e079d70@pumpkin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251211-vop2-atomic-fixups-v4-2-5d50eda26bf8@collabora.com>
On Thu, 11 Dec 2025 21:40:32 +0100
Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com> wrote:
> From: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
>
> We already clip the plane to the display bounds in atomic_check, and
> ensure that it is sufficiently sized. Instead of trying to catch this
> and adjust for it in atomic_update, just assert that atomic_check has
> done its job.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c | 29 +++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c
> index 20b49209ddcd..81b3eba07095 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c
> @@ -1214,28 +1214,17 @@ static void vop2_plane_atomic_update(struct drm_plane *plane,
> src_w = drm_rect_width(src) >> 16;
> src_h = drm_rect_height(src) >> 16;
> dsp_w = drm_rect_width(dest);
> -
> - if (dest->x1 + dsp_w > adjusted_mode->hdisplay) {
> - drm_dbg_kms(vop2->drm,
> - "vp%d %s dest->x1[%d] + dsp_w[%d] exceed mode hdisplay[%d]\n",
> - vp->id, win->data->name, dest->x1, dsp_w, adjusted_mode->hdisplay);
> - dsp_w = adjusted_mode->hdisplay - dest->x1;
> - if (dsp_w < 4)
> - dsp_w = 4;
> - src_w = dsp_w * src_w / drm_rect_width(dest);
> - }
> -
> dsp_h = drm_rect_height(dest);
>
> - if (dest->y1 + dsp_h > adjusted_mode->vdisplay) {
> - drm_dbg_kms(vop2->drm,
> - "vp%d %s dest->y1[%d] + dsp_h[%d] exceed mode vdisplay[%d]\n",
> - vp->id, win->data->name, dest->y1, dsp_h, adjusted_mode->vdisplay);
> - dsp_h = adjusted_mode->vdisplay - dest->y1;
> - if (dsp_h < 4)
> - dsp_h = 4;
> - src_h = dsp_h * src_h / drm_rect_height(dest);
> - }
> + /* drm_atomic_helper_check_plane_state calls drm_rect_clip_scaled for
> + * us, which keeps our planes bounded within the CRTC active area
> + */
> + WARN_ON(dest->x1 + dsp_w > adjusted_mode->hdisplay);
> + WARN_ON(dest->y1 + dsp_h > adjusted_mode->vdisplay);
> + WARN_ON(dsp_w < 4);
> + WARN_ON(dsp_h < 4);
> + WARN_ON(src_w < 4);
> + WARN_ON(src_h < 4);
You need to do something when the tests fail.
Carrying on regardless is never right.
David
>
> /*
> * This is workaround solution for IC design:
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-11 22:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-11 20:40 [PATCH v4 0/8] drm/rockchip: No more post-atomic_check fixups Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-12-11 20:40 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] drm/rockchip: vop2: Switch impossible format conditional to WARN_ON Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-12-11 22:38 ` David Laight
2025-12-12 12:43 ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-12-15 17:55 ` Daniel Stone
2025-12-15 18:16 ` David Laight
2025-12-11 20:40 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] drm/rockchip: vop2: Switch impossible pos " Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-12-11 22:41 ` David Laight [this message]
2025-12-15 17:57 ` Daniel Stone
2025-12-11 20:40 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] drm/rockchip: vop2: Fix Esmart test condition Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-12-11 20:40 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] drm/rockchip: vop2: Enforce scaling workaround in plane_check Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-12-11 20:40 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] drm/rockchip: vop2: Enforce AFBC source alignment " Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-12-11 20:40 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] drm/rockchip: vop2: Enforce AFBC transform stride align " Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-12-11 20:40 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] drm/rockchip: vop2: Use drm_is_afbc helper function Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-12-11 20:40 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] drm/rockchip: vop2: Simplify format_mod_supported Nicolas Frattaroli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251211224102.5e079d70@pumpkin \
--to=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=andy.yan@rock-chips.com \
--cc=chaoyi.chen@rock-chips.com \
--cc=daniels@collabora.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=hjc@rock-chips.com \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).