From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D0CBD6E2AC for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2025 15:49:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To: From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=p6SJYnp842vCkHQu4i1e9JURGgkIZOc40Ucg7D58Umw=; b=uOXqMq/tTUNN2OrFYBRXxILTlX SvciC2/1LJGedmTIB5OcfcsGin9vLYk7oAt+LU+BE2P/Fk+L/E+UKfAE3strpVcgM5lRU360wtsF/ 0uePFb/yArdSXJhIevIw1h6PdYlLOvyQIz91n7MsFEPxjWnKsh82qrg/h9QHuw9IA7s1qcs+tFabT vv4f8i3HARHD1Ap+TeLCclMcJIAOXpBeeRbXZL+CThtOkB4vND1rx/UDWxpuzH7ayWPhnqj2E0I/7 xcxyq8EaLfvU8sEa7l0MFJRo6Gbshguxvb4CZy9vmvbBAU8merUETdNceJFi5aKruDDz5pA0Krh+l 6bl3FjTA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vWGFW-00000008jJe-49OX; Thu, 18 Dec 2025 15:49:06 +0000 Received: from mail.andi.de1.cc ([2a02:c205:3004:2154::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vWGFU-00000008jIc-2hd9 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2025 15:49:05 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kemnade.info; s=20220719; h=References:In-Reply-To:Cc:From:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=p6SJYnp842vCkHQu4i1e9JURGgkIZOc40Ucg7D58Umw=; b=mboMVR0clmVwmOkik7DJ/d1LVk GKJTXr137XbyxnXLQy/exMN+xbuxmyL0eErPsCBvcU1/yNaZm8yuJXMN2TnBUjXU692kIrag3X5HN dOoxnwA2JdeDW3ZYbUD7ln7d0b764ixHN+w11j8NrtY+sfOEZsVS8DOgcLuu6iyF81By+Nwk3oSMW jXOHvbHZHtu66FqVsDPCKCQbQ4g5dEI0K+1rASggpmwLd4u+qWD7BYWQrPsYiS52kUkv1TFv6FgAC QRhkKNcK1sUAAb7oO7PoXDCDU+KJiCVRGvIHO3foOFZmvUQZ/aIS2nTvPbmJ29hqkVyquVhreRqSI xlLsk5mw==; Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 16:46:20 +0100 From: Andreas Kemnade To: "Luca Ceresoli" Cc: "Kory Maincent (TI.com)" , "Jyri Sarha" , "Tomi Valkeinen" , "Maarten Lankhorst" , "Maxime Ripard" , "Thomas Zimmermann" , "David Airlie" , "Simona Vetter" , "Rob Herring" , "Krzysztof Kozlowski" , "Conor Dooley" , "Russell King" , "Bartosz Golaszewski" , "Tony Lindgren" , "Andrzej Hajda" , "Neil Armstrong" , "Robert Foss" , "Laurent Pinchart" , "Jonas Karlman" , "Jernej Skrabec" , "Markus Schneider-Pargmann" , "Bajjuri Praneeth" , "Louis Chauvet" , "Thomas Petazzoni" , "Miguel Gazquez" , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/20] drm/tilcdc: Remove simulate_vesa_sync flag Message-ID: <20251218164620.40c0599d@kemnade.info> In-Reply-To: References: <20251211-feature_tilcdc-v2-0-f48bac3cd33e@bootlin.com> <20251211-feature_tilcdc-v2-3-f48bac3cd33e@bootlin.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.1 (GTK 3.24.49; aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20251218_074904_686451_54560AF6 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.46 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, 17 Dec 2025 15:20:09 +0100 "Luca Ceresoli" wrote: [...] > > Signed-off-by: Kory Maincent (TI.com) > > Code looks good. Based on your testing, which covered both boards currently > setting simulate_vesa_sync and boards not setting it: > > Reviewed-by: Luca Ceresoli > > Still it would be good to have this series, and especially this patch, > tested by someone having access to other TI boards. > Just that I do not mix up anything: grep tilcdc only gives: am335x-base0033.dts: compatible = "ti,tilcdc,slave"; am335x-guardian.dts: compatible = "ti,tilcdc,panel"; am335x-pdu001.dts: compatible = "ti,tilcdc,panel"; am335x-pepper.dts: compatible = "ti,tilcdc,panel"; am335x-sbc-t335.dts: compatible = "ti,tilcdc,panel"; am335x-sl50.dts: compatible = "ti,tilcdc,panel"; am33xx-l4.dtsi: compatible = "ti,am33xx-tilcdc"; so only am33xx affected? And no omap3/4/5. So apparently nothing I can test. @Roger: I suspect you have more of these boards than me. Regards, Andreas