Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Ahmed Tiba <ahmed.tiba@arm.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	tony.luck@intel.com, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
	conor+dt@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, rafael@kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry.Lamerov@arm.com,
	Michael.Zhao2@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] ras: share firmware-first estatus handling
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2025 02:35:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251221013534.GAaUdO5vWqMWAdbWbd@renoirsky.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251217112845.1814119-1-ahmed.tiba@arm.com>

On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 11:28:33AM +0000, Ahmed Tiba wrote:
> Platforms that rely on firmware-first RAS today only get the full Linux
> handling pipeline when the records arrive through ACPI/APEI GHES. This
> series lifts the generic parts of GHES into a reusable estatus core, wires

Why is this thing called "error status"?

Why is error status so significant so that you need to call it a thing,
much less a "core"?

It looks like you basically want to dump error records from a system
which doesn't support GHES into the common path so they get decoded?

I mean, I'm only guessing because I don't get any wiser from this text.

So how about you give the high-level, practical use spiel first? What's
the use case?

Then we can talk implementation details.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-12-21  1:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-17 11:28 [PATCH 00/12] ras: share firmware-first estatus handling Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-17 11:28 ` [PATCH 01/12] ras: add estatus core interfaces Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-17 11:28 ` [PATCH 02/12] ras: add estatus core implementation Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-18 15:42   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-12-19 14:35     ` Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-21 19:31   ` kernel test robot
2025-12-17 11:28 ` [PATCH 03/12] ras: add estatus vendor handling and processing Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-18 16:04   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-12-19 14:49     ` Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-19 15:30       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-12-19 18:11         ` Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-22  8:13           ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-12-29 15:01             ` Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-21 23:39   ` kernel test robot
2025-12-17 11:28 ` [PATCH 04/12] ras: add estatus queuing and IRQ/NMI handling Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-17 11:28 ` [PATCH 05/12] ras: flesh out estatus processing core Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-17 11:28 ` [PATCH 06/12] efi/cper: adopt estatus iteration helpers Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-17 11:28 ` [PATCH 07/12] ghes: prepare estatus hooks for shared handling Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-17 11:28 ` [PATCH 08/12] ghes: add estatus provider ops Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-17 11:28 ` [PATCH 09/12] ghes: route error handling through shared estatus core Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-17 11:28 ` [PATCH 10/12] dt-bindings: ras: document estatus provider Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-17 11:41   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-12-17 17:49     ` Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-18  6:48       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-12-18 10:22         ` Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-18 10:31         ` Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-19  9:53           ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-12-19 10:37             ` Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-19 10:47             ` Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-17 11:28 ` [PATCH 11/12] ras: add DeviceTree estatus provider driver Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-18 12:13   ` Will Deacon
2025-12-18 13:42     ` Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-18 15:19       ` Will Deacon
2025-12-19  9:02         ` Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-19 13:00           ` Will Deacon
2025-12-19 17:21             ` Ahmed Tiba
2026-01-05 21:09               ` Will Deacon
2025-12-17 11:28 ` [PATCH 12/12] doc: ras: describe firmware-first estatus flow Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-21  1:35 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2025-12-29 11:54   ` [PATCH 00/12] ras: share firmware-first estatus handling Ahmed Tiba
2026-01-14 14:15     ` Borislav Petkov
2026-01-15 12:17       ` Ahmed Tiba
2026-01-20 11:15         ` Borislav Petkov
2026-01-26 10:58           ` Ahmed Tiba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251221013534.GAaUdO5vWqMWAdbWbd@renoirsky.local \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=Dmitry.Lamerov@arm.com \
    --cc=Michael.Zhao2@arm.com \
    --cc=ahmed.tiba@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox