From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF7A6E67481 for ; Sat, 20 Dec 2025 19:38:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=7PeR8b7fxhywr1YkZkpgmBE5GLqifYFgqyw8GjyZWfc=; b=rD1tzI/Trz0XnkJ3zj1CWO4zEw ZF0w5BBq3hLfxFMups4JuKUPnkUEFP8zewkTTksxZTSg5TIFPAVHPbLLkTzKtgBEaAZTmvQkvFV1i pU1APA8LYByCDY61ZAPVk1dyIOcAfdK89KAyIkES+IUYYXnFYc+IALAcslkivhioiwgnmXF6xHevS +ljUyP/avAKWf3Fp7QSiqm8wLu6gqrz9FIt46vjE3XLKEiwopwAjBZlFbY4FRa7Xtq2jhSmLtAxZe CxdGS423+T39+ex7rshW/MgdoVZOaGkOBY6mawGEuSx+kImrSlcbIfy9fra3WJTinA2AJ62Assgh/ 2/I2vULA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vX2my-0000000BrAc-1TyT; Sat, 20 Dec 2025 19:38:52 +0000 Received: from mgamail.intel.com ([198.175.65.10]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vX2ms-0000000Br9f-2ncO for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 20 Dec 2025 19:38:51 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1766259527; x=1797795527; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=1GWReUGplOwGxcytr02vQVe2hYUxmjhJo00fyQ3IrEk=; b=F/ER3M2RIYhvMJQVCCvYAGQXcgRvmUqnYVXbA0ji2HpMMfEnsd479brC 5ShwzxmdZvVfNj8x4M7wcij9Kck9p3rkaBrdaa77sX2NrTmroTtPS4G54 6yQdbvXrJwx3t3Nd1o+d5b/K2rsO+1BcVimzjR612K4o0PZu65J2b3Dsc 0ZRgpQcrQFXOTWykvdfFtcojabYqWlZzNMYwkK2tUG4nRGbdjVvcVHG80 NhvDp4QIJSMFDwlWON6pfFnpI2Tur530IkI4+kPkr9jEDhUp06axXR3P5 SUSnZdKx0j42DpmtoqvxT6WTnbHWcZtuILhU27SOjwg7OAJzn9BRKD5TO g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: IV5LNJwwQtadVyG7xiC92A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: MU1d+Z6CRXi0UTWga0+rmA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11648"; a="85599370" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,164,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="85599370" Received: from orviesa009.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.149]) by orvoesa102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Dec 2025 11:38:46 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 4UvXX/ZDQCemeNPyxn8PdA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: n4ZP9A7dTKKU/y9jQj5Wjw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,164,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="198907422" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 0d09efa1b85f) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa009.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Dec 2025 11:38:42 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 0d09efa1b85f with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vX2ml-0000000054r-2AIJ; Sat, 20 Dec 2025 19:38:39 +0000 Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2025 03:38:24 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Jiri Olsa , Steven Rostedt , Florent Revest , Mark Rutland Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Menglong Dong , Song Liu Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 bpf-next 9/9] bpf,x86: Use single ftrace_ops for direct calls Message-ID: <202512210241.4wuAmCHu-lkp@intel.com> References: <20251215211402.353056-10-jolsa@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251215211402.353056-10-jolsa@kernel.org> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20251220_113846_801559_BC509046 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.99 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Jiri, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on bpf-next/master] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jiri-Olsa/ftrace-bpf-Remove-FTRACE_OPS_FL_JMP-ftrace_ops-flag/20251216-052916 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251215211402.353056-10-jolsa%40kernel.org patch subject: [PATCHv5 bpf-next 9/9] bpf,x86: Use single ftrace_ops for direct calls config: riscv-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251221/202512210241.4wuAmCHu-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 22.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project b324c9f4fa112d61a553bf489b5f4f7ceea05ea8) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251221/202512210241.4wuAmCHu-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512210241.4wuAmCHu-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> kernel/bpf/trampoline.c:367:9: error: call to undeclared function 'direct_ops_del'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 367 | ret = direct_ops_del(tr, old_addr); | ^ kernel/bpf/trampoline.c:367:9: note: did you mean 'direct_ops_free'? kernel/bpf/trampoline.c:298:13: note: 'direct_ops_free' declared here 298 | static void direct_ops_free(struct bpf_trampoline *tr) { } | ^ >> kernel/bpf/trampoline.c:381:9: error: call to undeclared function 'direct_ops_mod'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 381 | ret = direct_ops_mod(tr, new_addr, lock_direct_mutex); | ^ kernel/bpf/trampoline.c:381:9: note: did you mean 'direct_ops_free'? kernel/bpf/trampoline.c:298:13: note: 'direct_ops_free' declared here 298 | static void direct_ops_free(struct bpf_trampoline *tr) { } | ^ >> kernel/bpf/trampoline.c:404:9: error: call to undeclared function 'direct_ops_add'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 404 | ret = direct_ops_add(tr, new_addr); | ^ kernel/bpf/trampoline.c:404:9: note: did you mean 'direct_ops_free'? kernel/bpf/trampoline.c:298:13: note: 'direct_ops_free' declared here 298 | static void direct_ops_free(struct bpf_trampoline *tr) { } | ^ 3 errors generated. vim +/direct_ops_del +367 kernel/bpf/trampoline.c 360 361 static int unregister_fentry(struct bpf_trampoline *tr, u32 orig_flags, 362 void *old_addr) 363 { 364 int ret; 365 366 if (tr->func.ftrace_managed) > 367 ret = direct_ops_del(tr, old_addr); 368 else 369 ret = bpf_trampoline_update_fentry(tr, orig_flags, old_addr, NULL); 370 371 return ret; 372 } 373 374 static int modify_fentry(struct bpf_trampoline *tr, u32 orig_flags, 375 void *old_addr, void *new_addr, 376 bool lock_direct_mutex) 377 { 378 int ret; 379 380 if (tr->func.ftrace_managed) { > 381 ret = direct_ops_mod(tr, new_addr, lock_direct_mutex); 382 } else { 383 ret = bpf_trampoline_update_fentry(tr, orig_flags, old_addr, 384 new_addr); 385 } 386 return ret; 387 } 388 389 /* first time registering */ 390 static int register_fentry(struct bpf_trampoline *tr, void *new_addr) 391 { 392 void *ip = tr->func.addr; 393 unsigned long faddr; 394 int ret; 395 396 faddr = ftrace_location((unsigned long)ip); 397 if (faddr) { 398 if (!tr->fops) 399 return -ENOTSUPP; 400 tr->func.ftrace_managed = true; 401 } 402 403 if (tr->func.ftrace_managed) { > 404 ret = direct_ops_add(tr, new_addr); 405 } else { 406 ret = bpf_trampoline_update_fentry(tr, 0, NULL, new_addr); 407 } 408 409 return ret; 410 } 411 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki