From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, m.szyprowski@samsung.com,
robin.murphy@arm.com, will@kernel.org
Cc: v-songbaohua@oppo.com, zhengtangquan@oppo.com,
ryan.roberts@arm.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com, maz@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, surenb@google.com,
ardb@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] dma-mapping: Allow batched DMA sync operations if supported by the arch
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2025 13:36:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202512211320.LaiSSLAc-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251219053658.84978-6-21cnbao@gmail.com>
Hi Barry,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on v6.19-rc1 next-20251219]
[cannot apply to arm64/for-next/core]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Barry-Song/arm64-Provide-dcache_by_myline_op_nosync-helper/20251219-195810
base: linus/master
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251219053658.84978-6-21cnbao%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH 5/6] dma-mapping: Allow batched DMA sync operations if supported by the arch
config: x86_64-rhel-9.4 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251221/202512211320.LaiSSLAc-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-14 (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251221/202512211320.LaiSSLAc-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512211320.LaiSSLAc-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
kernel/dma/direct.c: In function 'dma_direct_unmap_sg':
>> kernel/dma/direct.c:456:25: error: implicit declaration of function 'dma_direct_unmap_phys_batch_add'; did you mean 'dma_direct_unmap_phys'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
456 | dma_direct_unmap_phys_batch_add(dev, sg->dma_address,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| dma_direct_unmap_phys
kernel/dma/direct.c: In function 'dma_direct_map_sg':
>> kernel/dma/direct.c:484:43: error: implicit declaration of function 'dma_direct_map_phys_batch_add'; did you mean 'dma_direct_map_phys'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
484 | sg->dma_address = dma_direct_map_phys_batch_add(dev, sg_phys(sg),
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| dma_direct_map_phys
vim +456 kernel/dma/direct.c
439
440 /*
441 * Unmaps segments, except for ones marked as pci_p2pdma which do not
442 * require any further action as they contain a bus address.
443 */
444 void dma_direct_unmap_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sgl,
445 int nents, enum dma_data_direction dir, unsigned long attrs)
446 {
447 struct scatterlist *sg;
448 int i;
449 bool need_sync = false;
450
451 for_each_sg(sgl, sg, nents, i) {
452 if (sg_dma_is_bus_address(sg)) {
453 sg_dma_unmark_bus_address(sg);
454 } else {
455 need_sync = true;
> 456 dma_direct_unmap_phys_batch_add(dev, sg->dma_address,
457 sg_dma_len(sg), dir, attrs);
458 }
459 }
460 if (need_sync && !dev_is_dma_coherent(dev))
461 arch_sync_dma_batch_flush();
462 }
463 #endif
464
465 int dma_direct_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sgl, int nents,
466 enum dma_data_direction dir, unsigned long attrs)
467 {
468 struct pci_p2pdma_map_state p2pdma_state = {};
469 struct scatterlist *sg;
470 int i, ret;
471 bool need_sync = false;
472
473 for_each_sg(sgl, sg, nents, i) {
474 switch (pci_p2pdma_state(&p2pdma_state, dev, sg_page(sg))) {
475 case PCI_P2PDMA_MAP_THRU_HOST_BRIDGE:
476 /*
477 * Any P2P mapping that traverses the PCI host bridge
478 * must be mapped with CPU physical address and not PCI
479 * bus addresses.
480 */
481 break;
482 case PCI_P2PDMA_MAP_NONE:
483 need_sync = true;
> 484 sg->dma_address = dma_direct_map_phys_batch_add(dev, sg_phys(sg),
485 sg->length, dir, attrs);
486 if (sg->dma_address == DMA_MAPPING_ERROR) {
487 ret = -EIO;
488 goto out_unmap;
489 }
490 break;
491 case PCI_P2PDMA_MAP_BUS_ADDR:
492 sg->dma_address = pci_p2pdma_bus_addr_map(
493 p2pdma_state.mem, sg_phys(sg));
494 sg_dma_len(sg) = sg->length;
495 sg_dma_mark_bus_address(sg);
496 continue;
497 default:
498 ret = -EREMOTEIO;
499 goto out_unmap;
500 }
501 sg_dma_len(sg) = sg->length;
502 }
503
504 if (need_sync && !dev_is_dma_coherent(dev))
505 arch_sync_dma_batch_flush();
506 return nents;
507
508 out_unmap:
509 dma_direct_unmap_sg(dev, sgl, i, dir, attrs | DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC);
510 return ret;
511 }
512
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-21 12:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-19 5:36 [PATCH 0/6] dma-mapping: arm64: support batched cache sync Barry Song
2025-12-19 5:36 ` [PATCH 1/6] arm64: Provide dcache_by_myline_op_nosync helper Barry Song
2025-12-19 12:20 ` Robin Murphy
2025-12-21 7:22 ` Barry Song
2025-12-19 5:36 ` [PATCH 2/6] arm64: Provide dcache_clean_poc_nosync helper Barry Song
2025-12-19 5:36 ` [PATCH 3/6] arm64: Provide dcache_inval_poc_nosync helper Barry Song
2025-12-19 12:34 ` Robin Murphy
2025-12-21 7:59 ` Barry Song
2025-12-19 5:36 ` [PATCH 4/6] arm64: Provide arch_sync_dma_ batched helpers Barry Song
2025-12-19 5:36 ` [PATCH 5/6] dma-mapping: Allow batched DMA sync operations if supported by the arch Barry Song
2025-12-20 17:37 ` kernel test robot
2025-12-21 5:15 ` Barry Song
2025-12-21 11:55 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-12-21 19:24 ` Barry Song
2025-12-22 8:49 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-12-23 0:02 ` Barry Song
2025-12-23 2:36 ` Barry Song
2025-12-23 14:14 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-12-24 1:29 ` Barry Song
2025-12-24 8:51 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-12-25 5:45 ` Barry Song
2025-12-25 12:36 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-12-25 13:31 ` Barry Song
2025-12-25 13:40 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-12-21 12:36 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-12-22 12:43 ` kernel test robot
2025-12-22 14:00 ` kernel test robot
2025-12-19 5:36 ` [PATCH RFC 6/6] dma-iommu: Allow DMA sync batching for IOVA link/unlink Barry Song
2025-12-19 6:04 ` [PATCH 0/6] dma-mapping: arm64: support batched cache sync Barry Song
2025-12-19 6:12 ` Barry Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202512211320.LaiSSLAc-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=v-songbaohua@oppo.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=zhengtangquan@oppo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).