From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>
Cc: v-songbaohua@oppo.com, zhengtangquan@oppo.com,
ryan.roberts@arm.com, will@kernel.org, anshuman.khandual@arm.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
surenb@google.com, iommu@lists.linux.dev, maz@kernel.org,
robin.murphy@arm.com, ardb@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] dma-mapping: Allow batched DMA sync operations if supported by the arch
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2025 15:40:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251225134052.GM11869@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGsJ_4zpWWLaynh1U4MKCS-N8tZ0tvE6tAmb0m+Pbf-kPsYQJg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Dec 26, 2025 at 02:31:42AM +1300, Barry Song wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2025 at 1:36 AM Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 25, 2025 at 06:45:09PM +1300, Barry Song wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > OK. Could you take a look at [1] and see if any further
> > > > > improvements are needed before I send v2?
> > > >
> > > > Everything looks ok, except these renames:
> > > > - arch_sync_dma_for_cpu(paddr, sg->length, dir);
> > > > + arch_sync_dma_for_cpu_batch_add(paddr, sg->length, dir);
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > I'm happy to drop the rename as outlined below-feedback welcome :-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cache.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cache.h
> > > index dd2c8586a725..487fb7c355ed 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cache.h
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cache.h
> > > @@ -87,6 +87,12 @@ int cache_line_size(void);
> > >
> > > #define dma_get_cache_alignment cache_line_size
> > >
> > > +static inline void arch_sync_dma_flush(void)
> > > +{
> > > + dsb(sy);
> > > +}
> > > +#define arch_sync_dma_flush arch_sync_dma_flush
> > > +
> > > /* Compress a u64 MPIDR value into 32 bits. */
> > > static inline u64 arch_compact_of_hwid(u64 id)
> > > {
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c
> > > index b2b5792b2caa..ae1ae0280eef 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c
> > > @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ void arch_sync_dma_for_device(phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size,
> > > {
> > > unsigned long start = (unsigned long)phys_to_virt(paddr);
> > >
> > > - dcache_clean_poc(start, start + size);
> > > + dcache_clean_poc_nosync(start, start + size);
> > > }
> > >
> > > void arch_sync_dma_for_cpu(phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size,
> > > @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ void arch_sync_dma_for_cpu(phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size,
> > > if (dir == DMA_TO_DEVICE)
> > > return;
> > >
> > > - dcache_inval_poc(start, start + size);
> > > + dcache_inval_poc_nosync(start, start + size);
> > > }
> > >
> > > void arch_dma_prep_coherent(struct page *page, size_t size)
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h b/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h
> > > index 4809204c674c..e7dd8a63b40e 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h
> > > @@ -361,6 +361,12 @@ static inline void arch_sync_dma_for_cpu(phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size,
> > > }
> > > #endif /* ARCH_HAS_SYNC_DMA_FOR_CPU */
> > >
> > > +#ifndef arch_sync_dma_flush
> >
> > You likely need to wrap this in "#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SYNC_DMA_FLUSH"
> > as done in the surrounding code.
>
> I've dropped the new Kconfig option and now rely on whether
> arch_sync_dma_flush() is provided by the architecture. If an arch
> does not define arch_sync_dma_flush() in its asm/cache.h, a no-op
> implementation is used instead.
I know.
>
> Do you still prefer keeping a config option to match the surrounding
> code style?
I don't have a strong preference here. Go ahead and try your current
version and see how people respond.
> Note that on arm64, arch_sync_dma_flush() is already a
> static inline rather than an extern, so it is not strictly aligned
> with the others.
> Having both CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SYNC_DMA_FLUSH and
> "#ifndef arch_sync_dma_flush" seems duplicated.
>
> Another potential optimization would be to drop these options
> entirely and handle this via ifndefs, letting each architecture
> define the macros in asm/cache.h instead.
>
> Whether arch implements arch_sync_dma_for_xx() as static inline or
> as external functions makes no difference.
>
> - #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SYNC_DMA_FOR_CPU
> - void arch_sync_dma_for_cpu(phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size,-
> enum dma_data_direction dir);
> - #else
> + #ifndef arch_sync_dma_for_cpu
> static inline void arch_sync_dma_for_cpu(phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size,
> enum dma_data_direction dir)
> {
> }
> #endif /* ARCH_HAS_SYNC_DMA_FOR_CPU */
>
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > > +static inline void arch_sync_dma_flush(void)
> > > +{
> > > +}
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SYNC_DMA_FOR_CPU_ALL
> > > void arch_sync_dma_for_cpu_all(void);
> > > #else
> > >
>
> Thanks
> Barry
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-25 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-19 5:36 [PATCH 0/6] dma-mapping: arm64: support batched cache sync Barry Song
2025-12-19 5:36 ` [PATCH 1/6] arm64: Provide dcache_by_myline_op_nosync helper Barry Song
2025-12-19 12:20 ` Robin Murphy
2025-12-21 7:22 ` Barry Song
2025-12-19 5:36 ` [PATCH 2/6] arm64: Provide dcache_clean_poc_nosync helper Barry Song
2025-12-19 5:36 ` [PATCH 3/6] arm64: Provide dcache_inval_poc_nosync helper Barry Song
2025-12-19 12:34 ` Robin Murphy
2025-12-21 7:59 ` Barry Song
2025-12-19 5:36 ` [PATCH 4/6] arm64: Provide arch_sync_dma_ batched helpers Barry Song
2025-12-19 5:36 ` [PATCH 5/6] dma-mapping: Allow batched DMA sync operations if supported by the arch Barry Song
2025-12-20 17:37 ` kernel test robot
2025-12-21 5:15 ` Barry Song
2025-12-21 11:55 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-12-21 19:24 ` Barry Song
2025-12-22 8:49 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-12-23 0:02 ` Barry Song
2025-12-23 2:36 ` Barry Song
2025-12-23 14:14 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-12-24 1:29 ` Barry Song
2025-12-24 8:51 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-12-25 5:45 ` Barry Song
2025-12-25 12:36 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-12-25 13:31 ` Barry Song
2025-12-25 13:40 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2025-12-21 12:36 ` kernel test robot
2025-12-22 12:43 ` kernel test robot
2025-12-22 14:00 ` kernel test robot
2025-12-19 5:36 ` [PATCH RFC 6/6] dma-iommu: Allow DMA sync batching for IOVA link/unlink Barry Song
2025-12-19 6:04 ` [PATCH 0/6] dma-mapping: arm64: support batched cache sync Barry Song
2025-12-19 6:12 ` Barry Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251225134052.GM11869@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=v-songbaohua@oppo.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=zhengtangquan@oppo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).