From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80FCDE92734 for ; Mon, 29 Dec 2025 16:03:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To: From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=HmUgq1yr7Ldrp6As2Z2B3JdatI+KSxe5tvhmxvD24NQ=; b=viL/IdI0FtgawDQg8nec/+aoVP +9bsbjykiv8AtZd7X0H9GtcgWqve+sfKxHYhgP8qCboUwHaSbpPK/pn5qifp7YGiZR87e6DE/eCRl xXOBjRSJpsrUuFvrmRYrT0FAYGDsHgArpPm/uR8BICMIumhQRk8sI7Ibtlp34fYk0Gr/I1DuyBXLN AfQiLXXStbS3RMF38Jknujt9xnpcrRlUt/Mr20To+eu7so5+4YTw4Re0kIGxt3LvUHDkBCOX74FoZ Xz43Ru+ODYKDbqS38yZwwU3w55K4mAxPDblDtV2WRW6/Isp20bDRTy8lVo1jP4bP/RVzXw64xfeLG amOFcB6Q==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vaFig-00000003rWi-1wt3; Mon, 29 Dec 2025 16:03:42 +0000 Received: from smtprelay0017.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.17] helo=relay.hostedemail.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vaFie-00000003rWI-0zgZ for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 29 Dec 2025 16:03:41 +0000 Received: from omf06.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay08.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FCD31401C3; Mon, 29 Dec 2025 16:03:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [HIDDEN] (Authenticated sender: rostedt@goodmis.org) by omf06.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5275D2000F; Mon, 29 Dec 2025 16:03:32 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2025 11:03:37 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: Jiri Olsa Cc: Steven Rostedt , Florent Revest , Mark Rutland , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Menglong Dong , Song Liu Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 bpf-next 9/9] bpf,x86: Use single ftrace_ops for direct calls Message-ID: <20251229110337.030232e0@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: <20251215211402.353056-1-jolsa@kernel.org> <20251215211402.353056-10-jolsa@kernel.org> <20251218112608.11a14a4a@gandalf.local.home> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.20.0git84 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Stat-Signature: wk4rtw6rr6g4p4h5uhrzm8w5hsw49mbm X-Rspamd-Server: rspamout01 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 5275D2000F X-Session-Marker: 726F737465647440676F6F646D69732E6F7267 X-Session-ID: U2FsdGVkX1+B2wF6tKeYH5GnSEs+kzFmQoFDKLjrxgk= X-HE-Tag: 1767024212-326374 X-HE-Meta: U2FsdGVkX1/bW0jhkTC4A5lBxmoz7injUkXEiRwc49PHTrEtedO+o2+EF7kEIX13OfCkWR8cfC/wf6yKI/Q0NQDlTnSJsNmpf4yT0wpVV+N4nepWY5mkqko6TEbEej1Hr/XBJOTUmUhLNAw+F8Po9cqWSf80LUhYgReNteLIHYoT3xCo0TXT+IvZW0BFzVvJMpeRVZg0aujEtfTujLBdfwJ6gs/3VmkTqwGCQMfW0cPRs+W71KOxMC0xTVONhn/fO58DXW07r0HY13AiCiGRLvic7zoMOT1W6fEzioF/e36A4d8P1U4RXDcCu+d2MOGF7nIBtPhn3X26ymHlZZaJMYNK8sq9I5FMZaPIESRM/MU5RtaPB+ULqw== X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20251229_080340_350224_4650896F X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 6.61 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sun, 28 Dec 2025 16:22:18 +0100 Jiri Olsa wrote: > actualy, it seems that having it the original way with adding the rest > of the wrappers for !CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALLS case is > easier AFAICS I'm fine either way. -- Steve