From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7695FD4A5EA for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2026 03:05:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To: From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=Y/Dkyj6XQc3q9kwRLC+eOQBUTpahy9oV06Yp+kzaqXc=; b=YyIAhyb6wuL8XPmj+zSXPeZpt7 guvCxj5HOi7gkFh2qoeQ7TPXkNrcDkouR4i7loiWwnmm6cCshfqfG9wUpCfDjmbL+uacFgqNPOUfm e5EoTylcL0Z2WG85wmybpBALtVa9ME2xVq/JSZ0oaj+HxA1VNzgg7fnQVPo4dv+CTuAXgyuVZQiJr uW3zPngOBfgOMgEBX36IIR66z5tglU5Xypr31BUEgalp+XH5htA23wAJkBvxHV4jzP5xiNz7m/b1z 5Q9rgwpjtWYmddPVdi8jID4tksRG6RyLGt6E0bA3WO4QTECTdSnj2i59o7uZCLKuu9IUQrh58O+VE t5TsIabw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vga9n-0000000DVZX-2WSB; Fri, 16 Jan 2026 03:05:51 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([172.234.252.31]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vga9k-0000000DVZ6-3yYh; Fri, 16 Jan 2026 03:05:50 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E00534338D; Fri, 16 Jan 2026 03:05:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4EA59C116D0; Fri, 16 Jan 2026 03:05:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1768532747; bh=U3Aoti0YPoxifwNh7V0YYpw1gTTxaBib3ervHQ0XypE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=L1QYiDqKnDOSSq+xNu+85WqFwC8Qoq9llFdwS+6br3L3Q5qGCwSBH4tzlpuO3mq3r vaEOV8686ZZIri8oA4Plxr8THRmQ6eDgQHLdKqOoGFF2BrIk6eOieq1eiChchXjgAE ND1QawHZH0QXhocxN9ghOzjhfneolngOFAQMz6fg0slaJUtuiMZLk7PnFhHoZkJ7Tm 3wUSihRl3EyFF5DahJf+HsOKeV7ufvwsJ44HfcS9VcYQYRHdeOm7IR4w+ouPDkIUG4 sMH810M6wuXKRoJEovwOxYpa2C3grmqrC5EPFCP2x8zuUc7moPv5lg+OVTZ+vQQ6V+ +R/3912fAVxfQ== Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 19:05:46 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Lorenzo Bianconi Cc: Sayantan Nandy , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, sayantan.nandy@airoha.com, bread.hsu@airoha.com, kuldeep.malik@airoha.com, aniket.negi@airoha.com, rajeev.kumar@airoha.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: airoha_eth: increase max mtu to 9220 for DSA jumbo frames Message-ID: <20260115190546.5ede6750@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20260115084837.52307-1-sayantann11@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260115_190549_039497_7670E790 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.01 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:40:03 +0100 Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > > The Industry standard for jumbo frame MTU is 9216 bytes. When using DSA > > sub-system, an extra 4 byte tag is added to each frame. To allow users > > to set the standard 9216-byte MTU via ifconfig,increase AIROHA_MAX_MTU > > to 9220 bytes (9216+4). > > > > Signed-off-by: Sayantan Nandy > > I think the patch is fine, but here you are missing to specify this is v2 > and this patch targets net-next. Moreover, please wait 24h before reposting > a new version of the same patch. FWIW this is a good reminder for Sayantan for the future but it doesn't merit a repost in itself. net-next is our default tree, and pw bot guessed correctly. That said I think Andrews request warrants some extra testing here so: -- pw-bot: cr