From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>,
arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: Document arm,no-completion-irq property
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 13:58:09 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260115195809.GA1086054-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aWjWLFi6xUIn3_GQ@bogus>
On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 11:57:32AM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 01:48:56AM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Document new property arm,no-completion-irq, which sets all SCMI
> > operation into poll mode. This is meant to work around uncooperative
> > SCP implementations, which do not generate completion interrupts.
> > This applies primarily on mbox shmem based implementations.
> >
> > With this property set, such implementations which do not generate
> > interrupts can be interacted with, until they are fixed to generate
> > interrupts properly.
> >
> > Note that, because the original base protocol exchange also requires
> > some sort of completion mechanism, it is not possible to query SCMI
> > itself for this property and it must be described in DT. While this
> > does look a bit like policy, the SCMI provider is part of the
> > hardware, hence DT.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>
> > ---
> > Cc: Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
> > Cc: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
> > Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> > Cc: arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
> > ---
> > V2: s@mean@&t and limit poll transport to mailbox/shmem only
> > V3: - Reformat the commit message, expand property description to
> > explicitly spell out this is hardware description.
> > - Rename property from arm,poll-transport to arm,no-completion-irq
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml | 11 +++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
> > index be817fd9cc34b..46d9a0a9a0e58 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
> > @@ -146,6 +146,14 @@ properties:
> > this platform. If set, the value should be non-zero.
> > minimum: 1
> >
> > + arm,no-completion-irq:
> > + type: boolean
> > + description:
> > + An optional property which unconditionally forces polling in all transports,
> > + meant for hardware which does not generate completion interrupts. This is
> > + mainly meant to work around uncooperative SCP or SCP firmware, which does
> > + not generate completion interrupts.
> > +
>
> I would swap the order of the above two points.
>
> “This optional property is intended for hardware that does not generate
> completion interrupts and can be used to unconditionally enable forced polling
> mode of operation.”
>
> You need to update the commit message accordingly. We do not want to indicate
> how this property should be used, as that is left to the implementation. The
> emphasis should be on what this property indicates to its users.
>
> Please update only if DT maintainers are also in agreement. I have just
> expressed my opinion. IIUC, it is aligned to standard DT binding rules but
> I may be wrong.
Makes sense to me.
With Sudeep's suggestion:
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
Rob
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-15 19:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-15 0:48 [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: Document arm,no-completion-irq property Marek Vasut
2026-01-15 0:48 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Implement " Marek Vasut
2026-01-15 11:57 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: Document " Sudeep Holla
2026-01-15 19:58 ` Rob Herring [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260115195809.GA1086054-robh@kernel.org \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox