Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] ARM: mm: fault: Enable interrupts before invoking __do_user_fault()

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>]

On 2026-01-16 20:09:43 [+0000], Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > Oh, and, as I've said on netdev recently, I have lots of patches. I
> > don't have time to push all patches all the time. Those that I think
> > are the highest priority get the attention - so if something goes
> > quiet, the patches don't get progressed (because something else has
> > taken over.)
> > 
> > I haven't published these yet to my external git tree because they're
> > currently on top of my raw private "development" branch containing...
> > 
> > $ git lg origin..rmk | wc -l
> > 473
> > 
> > many of those behind those I mentioned above. At some point I need to
> > move them to their own separate branch, or to the "misc" branch after
> > sending them to the mailing list... but the latter means spending time
> > writing a covering message summarising the changes, and the key thing
> > is "time".
> > 
> > I've wasted almost all of today running a bisect for a stmmac issue that
> > takes out my _entire_ network at home. It's wasted because what I
> > thought was a good commit turns out, on re-testing, to have been bad,
> > and right now I have no idea what a good commit is, and whether that
> > even exists before the platform support was merged.
> 
> Sorry for a third reply... yesterday I started at about 10am, finished
> at 2am last night chasing a different stmmac regression.
> 
> Yea, if there was more time, then I could push all the patches I have,
> but I don't, and the above patches were generated back when we were
> discussing the issue last time.

No worries. Is your tree rmk tree public so I could pull those and test?
Do you want me to review any of those?

Sebastian