From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E47FAC982C3 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2026 20:30:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=WecrocRMKZU/iNM4UOnRLQSWj3zv3D/TPEXXPniLmn8=; b=2S+aDGV1kDmj7NnSBi7sSWZYZI sFr7jl0fEf2Yw7rCEQQDDMl8+6uC7WVhxmni1zvXbEmWXmlPRyxkrfp9vW70AKwA9QtHH1hmD6ygy bBQxndX6/85PJ8M0raPL6PGu+4lLSYlgiNendeB9GnsRLuXKXTmt46hqdvL5v/2yJYpp3WmfsbCF2 C4j2+A4mz6SAqBsqfRBS+yjjYVr0BGJXThdDtNGA6AW4XEqElpkiAhqZbWKF7ThgstlpjWfDdZjz9 BXy1EPcZm7yIhZxExbAMgR7YxG3RlAp71j0Sd6Qrfq5+CXxfgyUmyO0s8gnOmR3/K7PRd1ftE0CfP oiIcdJmA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vgqSQ-0000000Eol7-3RZg; Fri, 16 Jan 2026 20:30:10 +0000 Received: from galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vgqSO-0000000Eokd-272c for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2026 20:30:09 +0000 Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 21:30:02 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1768595404; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=WecrocRMKZU/iNM4UOnRLQSWj3zv3D/TPEXXPniLmn8=; b=lNB4oS6L/T2CJs+x4Ue/QNzT2Im4c+SSYJ2l+IqAVGrg80PZ7qzZbGSBrs9X8hLyq5xj+6 yBUBK7oJYhkZPerxNaQdhfwkWn3O9pzafpV03w7QUvZrUt9MUMyV/lsZ2HwLNtaxY4/uNW C7vPHJ4bMsNKYxt9Ax0sc6/HeKcrDKfb9ZZByZ3H40gNsbNr8yNH7E4GqnWjdaQXSMwfKD UOI8yIprFCNnS9mzukOhVJs/ccTK6K6idWlockkHpwurtihcvWcdZwRovXnRa5IMjzSIJY 26WoMK6GUvruDcn2HCGSL59U00vegz8EnpsRfJXWGvYV4vDsebbm3EKP9V9MMg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1768595404; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=WecrocRMKZU/iNM4UOnRLQSWj3zv3D/TPEXXPniLmn8=; b=ZAJ/26hUWZYJCgXrahM+b5b5tJPh4hmp+MPndaGil0ynh7KDmT0wDBoUQVRohVpEgokmbM WtSNY2361Mo4+HBw== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: "Russell King (Oracle)" Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, Arnd Bergmann , Linus Walleij , "Yadi.hu" , Bryan Brattlof Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] ARM: mm: fault: Enable interrupts before invoking __do_user_fault() Message-ID: <20260116203002.ocPCBG8L@linutronix.de> References: <20260116170041.1059997-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20260116170041.1059997-2-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20260116181201.v-z31XJY@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260116_123008_685283_AB4BF7D3 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 24.34 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 2026-01-16 20:09:43 [+0000], Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > > Oh, and, as I've said on netdev recently, I have lots of patches. I > > don't have time to push all patches all the time. Those that I think > > are the highest priority get the attention - so if something goes > > quiet, the patches don't get progressed (because something else has > > taken over.) > > > > I haven't published these yet to my external git tree because they're > > currently on top of my raw private "development" branch containing... > > > > $ git lg origin..rmk | wc -l > > 473 > > > > many of those behind those I mentioned above. At some point I need to > > move them to their own separate branch, or to the "misc" branch after > > sending them to the mailing list... but the latter means spending time > > writing a covering message summarising the changes, and the key thing > > is "time". > > > > I've wasted almost all of today running a bisect for a stmmac issue that > > takes out my _entire_ network at home. It's wasted because what I > > thought was a good commit turns out, on re-testing, to have been bad, > > and right now I have no idea what a good commit is, and whether that > > even exists before the platform support was merged. > > Sorry for a third reply... yesterday I started at about 10am, finished > at 2am last night chasing a different stmmac regression. > > Yea, if there was more time, then I could push all the patches I have, > but I don't, and the above patches were generated back when we were > discussing the issue last time. No worries. Is your tree rmk tree public so I could pull those and test? Do you want me to review any of those? Sebastian