public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Salman Nabi <salman.nabi@arm.com>,
	vvidwans@nvidia.com, andre.przywara@arm.com,
	sudeep.holla@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	lpieralisi@kernel.org
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
	ardb@kernel.org, chao.gao@intel.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sdonthineni@nvidia.com,
	vsethi@nvidia.com, vwadekar@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] firmware: smccc: add support for Live Firmware Activation (LFA)
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 05:35:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202601200543.EKFOBfnW-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260119122729.287522-2-salman.nabi@arm.com>

Hi Salman,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on soc/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.19-rc6 next-20260116]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Salman-Nabi/firmware-smccc-add-support-for-Live-Firmware-Activation-LFA/20260119-203221
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/soc/soc.git for-next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260119122729.287522-2-salman.nabi%40arm.com
patch subject: [PATCH 1/1] firmware: smccc: add support for Live Firmware Activation (LFA)
config: arm-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260120/202601200543.EKFOBfnW-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 22.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 9b8addffa70cee5b2acc5454712d9cf78ce45710)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260120/202601200543.EKFOBfnW-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202601200543.EKFOBfnW-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:179:28: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
     179 |         struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs reg = { 0 };
         |                                   ^
   drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:179:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
     179 |         struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs reg = { 0 };
         |                ^
>> drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:184:2: error: call to undeclared function 'arm_smccc_1_2_invoke'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     184 |         arm_smccc_1_2_invoke(&reg, &reg);
         |         ^
   drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:194:28: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
     194 |         struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs reg = { 0 };
         |                                   ^
   drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:194:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
     194 |         struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs reg = { 0 };
         |                ^
   drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:198:2: error: call to undeclared function 'arm_smccc_1_2_invoke'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     198 |         arm_smccc_1_2_invoke(&reg, &reg);
         |         ^
   drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:220:28: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
     220 |         struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs reg = { 0 };
         |                                   ^
   drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:220:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
     220 |         struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs reg = { 0 };
         |                ^
   drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:234:3: error: call to undeclared function 'arm_smccc_1_2_invoke'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     234 |                 arm_smccc_1_2_invoke(&reg, &reg);
         |                 ^
   drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:290:28: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
     290 |         struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs reg = { 0 };
         |                                   ^
   drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:290:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
     290 |         struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs reg = { 0 };
         |                ^
   drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:318:3: error: call to undeclared function 'arm_smccc_1_2_invoke'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     318 |                 arm_smccc_1_2_invoke(&reg, &reg);
         |                 ^
   drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:360:28: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
     360 |         struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs reg = { 0 };
         |                                   ^
   drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:360:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
     360 |         struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs reg = { 0 };
         |                ^
   drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:368:2: error: call to undeclared function 'arm_smccc_1_2_invoke'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     368 |         arm_smccc_1_2_invoke(&reg, &reg);
         |         ^
   drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:434:28: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
     434 |         struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs reg = { 0 };
         |                                   ^
   drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:434:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
     434 |         struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs reg = { 0 };
         |                ^
   drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:443:2: error: call to undeclared function 'arm_smccc_1_2_invoke'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     443 |         arm_smccc_1_2_invoke(&reg, &reg);
         |         ^
   drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:586:28: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
     586 |         struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs reg = { 0 };
         |                                   ^
   drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:586:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
     586 |         struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs reg = { 0 };
         |                ^
   drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:600:3: error: call to undeclared function 'arm_smccc_1_2_invoke'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     600 |                 arm_smccc_1_2_invoke(&reg, &reg);
         |                 ^
   drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:619:28: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
     619 |         struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs reg = { 0 };
         |                                   ^
   drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:619:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
     619 |         struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs reg = { 0 };
         |                ^
   drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:623:2: error: call to undeclared function 'arm_smccc_1_2_invoke'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     623 |         arm_smccc_1_2_invoke(&reg, &reg);
         |         ^
   16 errors generated.


vim +179 drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c

   176	
   177	static unsigned long get_nr_lfa_components(void)
   178	{
 > 179		struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs reg = { 0 };
   180	
   181		reg.a0 = LFA_1_0_FN_GET_INFO;
   182		reg.a1 = 0; /* lfa_info_selector = 0 */
   183	
 > 184		arm_smccc_1_2_invoke(&reg, &reg);
   185		if (reg.a0 != LFA_SUCCESS)
   186			return reg.a0;
   187	
   188		return reg.a1;
   189	}
   190	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-01-19 21:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-19 12:27 [PATCH 0/1] Arm Live Firmware Activation (LFA) support Salman Nabi
2026-01-19 12:27 ` [PATCH 1/1] firmware: smccc: add support for Live Firmware Activation (LFA) Salman Nabi
2026-01-19 16:29   ` kernel test robot
2026-01-19 16:41     ` Andre Przywara
2026-01-19 18:41   ` kernel test robot
2026-01-19 21:35   ` kernel test robot [this message]
2026-01-27 23:01   ` Vedashree Vidwans
2026-01-29 17:26     ` Andre Przywara
2026-01-30 19:29       ` Vedashree Vidwans
2026-01-30 20:31         ` Andre Przywara
2026-01-31  1:35   ` Trilok Soni
2026-02-02 15:52     ` Salman Nabi
2026-02-06  6:37       ` Trilok Soni
2026-02-10 22:20   ` Vedashree Vidwans
2026-02-20 17:39   ` Andre Przywara
2026-02-20 21:48     ` Trilok Soni
2026-03-13  9:46   ` Nirmoy Das
2026-03-13 14:39     ` Andre Przywara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202601200543.EKFOBfnW-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=salman.nabi@arm.com \
    --cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=vvidwans@nvidia.com \
    --cc=vwadekar@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox