From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2ABE7D3F069 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2026 14:48:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To: From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=e2hbglJ3NqkeqxI2aUImPal9i+6TUbFt0M/9KmEyxYU=; b=3VVunFjAsVpru3x2bGWZMIdOQv uggg3hAoc5UQXpdodUfT4ittu0LVlseYUlvVzmGKg6aCiwy/gclRUzeyP4vXEIM443608uPAjS6Ea foGeKXL20/yMzkhOh0xfr2ViPy/71CX7xAMKfr0JBhpCZ4xDKkfSwqiXztqfnzD9i3DFP+I6drVUj lKxSqQwMW3/X+kLU0fleumNtIOWgYIuvXL9M8PtBfE5pMOsjr6DdpRIBIeKFku7FXje6gKeQGT2be GFqnr1kIQUhE+Ht0+myeZqyJg5BFXHafj8xv4tqy93TJ3TpDYDDsCcywHveZ0xN2bDYntn1OUV/1I +qC1EQIQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vl6q8-0000000GCuN-1wbF; Wed, 28 Jan 2026 14:48:16 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([172.105.4.254]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vl6q6-0000000GCti-2wOs for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 28 Jan 2026 14:48:14 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 284CC60007; Wed, 28 Jan 2026 14:48:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7825DC4CEF1; Wed, 28 Jan 2026 14:48:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1769611693; bh=m2NFIt+B2FSUkKuThAjS+VA07lWrNORrRSvzgZb2hA4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=VbNKi0oaGSSePL5TN6ePUN/kffAfuRRguuyN+pbWGQtCtjAzyeLM6rscyDA7d/vZO giZnyq5mTVpKBQBXA2VfOZXlpbj2NL3aYhPeBP9rnPYlg1zarjIa2RC4pC6+cnWGiu EgT3OqsG5qnPpsFih+kXjdvFxYxvIsDFfNciQYI22Q6HAj8r43hp5qq3aRxe4oeM2R Dn5kbfgM0PDWfIQFTdL/RlmfmdJdEYsE8GJ2bbtBOfvKlRfIb7OLaJDeT1LMxsmw0H akVEdFzAcOTfDMf1RjWsuDTVhP6VZFR4tnA+RSo5Vv+MUGBBR8k5mO2GtN0mGoAMmE XBRPVtcy62mIw== Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 09:48:20 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: Jiri Olsa Cc: Florent Revest , Mark Rutland , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Menglong Dong , Song Liu Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 bpf-next 0/9] ftrace,bpf: Use single direct ops for bpf trampolines Message-ID: <20260128094820.0d32327f@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20251230145010.103439-1-jolsa@kernel.org> References: <20251230145010.103439-1-jolsa@kernel.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.20.0git84 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, 30 Dec 2025 15:50:01 +0100 Jiri Olsa wrote: > Jiri Olsa (9): > ftrace,bpf: Remove FTRACE_OPS_FL_JMP ftrace_ops flag > ftrace: Make alloc_and_copy_ftrace_hash direct friendly > ftrace: Export some of hash related functions > ftrace: Add update_ftrace_direct_add function > ftrace: Add update_ftrace_direct_del function > ftrace: Add update_ftrace_direct_mod function > bpf: Add trampoline ip hash table > ftrace: Factor ftrace_ops ops_func interface > bpf,x86: Use single ftrace_ops for direct calls I reviewed all the above patches with the exception of patch 7 (which was BPF only). I even ran the entire set through my internal tests and they passed. I don't have anything for this merge window that will conflict with this series, so if you want to push it through the BPF tree, feel free to do so. For patches 1-6,8,9: Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) -- Steve