public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: elver@google.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	 Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	 Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	llvm@lists.linux.dev,
	 David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/3] arm64: Optimize __READ_ONCE() with CONFIG_LTO=y
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2026 14:28:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260130132951.2714396-3-elver@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260130132951.2714396-1-elver@google.com>

Rework arm64 LTO __READ_ONCE() to improve code generation as follows:

1. Replace _Generic-based __unqual_scalar_typeof() with more complete
   __rwonce_typeof_unqual(). This strips qualifiers from all types, not
   just integer types, which is required to be able to assign (must be
   non-const) to __u.__val in the non-atomic case (required for #2).

Once our minimum compiler versions are bumped, this just becomes
TYPEOF_UNQUAL() (or typeof_unqual() should we decide to adopt C23
naming).  Sadly the fallback version of __rwonce_typeof_unqual() cannot
be used as a general TYPEOF_UNQUAL() fallback (see code comments).

One subtle point here is that non-integer types of __val could be const
or volatile within the union with the old __unqual_scalar_typeof(), if
the passed variable is const or volatile. This would then result in a
forced load from the stack if __u.__val is volatile; in the case of
const, it does look odd if the underlying storage changes, but the
compiler is told said member is "const" -- it smells like UB.

2. Eliminate the atomic flag and ternary conditional expression. Move
   the fallback volatile load into the default case of the switch,
   ensuring __u is unconditionally initialized across all paths.
   The statement expression now unconditionally returns __u.__val.

This refactoring appears to help the compiler improve (or fix) code
generation.

With a defconfig + LTO + debug options builds, we observe different
codegen for the following functions:

	btrfs_reclaim_sweep (708 -> 1032 bytes)
	btrfs_sinfo_bg_reclaim_threshold_store (200 -> 204 bytes)
	check_mem_access (3652 -> 3692 bytes) [inlined bpf_map_is_rdonly]
	console_flush_all (1268 -> 1264 bytes)
	console_lock_spinning_disable_and_check (180 -> 176 bytes)
	igb_add_filter (640 -> 636 bytes)
	igb_config_tx_modes (2404 -> 2400 bytes)
	kvm_vcpu_on_spin (480 -> 476 bytes)
	map_freeze (376 -> 380 bytes)
	netlink_bind (1664 -> 1656 bytes)
	nmi_cpu_backtrace (404 -> 400 bytes)
	set_rps_cpu (516 -> 520 bytes)
	swap_cluster_readahead (944 -> 932 bytes)
	tcp_accecn_third_ack (328 -> 336 bytes)
	tcp_create_openreq_child (1764 -> 1772 bytes)
	tcp_data_queue (5784 -> 5892 bytes)
	tcp_ecn_rcv_synack (620 -> 628 bytes)
	xen_manage_runstate_time (944 -> 896 bytes)
	xen_steal_clock (340 -> 296 bytes)

Increase of some functions are due to more aggressive inlining due to
better codegen (in this build, e.g. bpf_map_is_rdonly is no longer
present due to being inlined completely).

Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
---
v3:
* Comment.

v2:
* Add __rwonce_typeof_unqual() as fallback for old compilers.
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h
index fc0fb42b0b64..42c9e8429274 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h
@@ -19,6 +19,20 @@
 		"ldapr"	#sfx "\t" #regs,				\
 	ARM64_HAS_LDAPR)
 
+#ifdef USE_TYPEOF_UNQUAL
+#define __rwonce_typeof_unqual(x) TYPEOF_UNQUAL(x)
+#else
+/*
+ * Fallback for older compilers (Clang < 19).
+ *
+ * Uses the fact that, for all supported Clang versions, 'auto' correctly drops
+ * qualifiers. Unlike typeof_unqual(), the type must be completely defined, i.e.
+ * no forward-declared struct pointer dereferences.  The array-to-pointer decay
+ * case does not matter for usage in READ_ONCE() either.
+ */
+#define __rwonce_typeof_unqual(x) typeof(({ auto ____t = (x); ____t; }))
+#endif
+
 /*
  * When building with LTO, there is an increased risk of the compiler
  * converting an address dependency headed by a READ_ONCE() invocation
@@ -32,8 +46,7 @@
 #define __READ_ONCE(x)							\
 ({									\
 	typeof(&(x)) __x = &(x);					\
-	int atomic = 1;							\
-	union { __unqual_scalar_typeof(*__x) __val; char __c[1]; } __u;	\
+	union { __rwonce_typeof_unqual(*__x) __val; char __c[1]; } __u;	\
 	switch (sizeof(x)) {						\
 	case 1:								\
 		asm volatile(__LOAD_RCPC(b, %w0, %1)			\
@@ -56,9 +69,9 @@
 			: "Q" (*__x) : "memory");			\
 		break;							\
 	default:							\
-		atomic = 0;						\
+		__u.__val = *(volatile typeof(*__x) *)__x;		\
 	}								\
-	atomic ? (typeof(*__x))__u.__val : (*(volatile typeof(*__x) *)__x);\
+	__u.__val;							\
 })
 
 #endif	/* !BUILD_VDSO */
-- 
2.53.0.rc1.225.gd81095ad13-goog



  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-01-30 13:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-30 13:28 [PATCH v3 0/3] arm64: Fixes for __READ_ONCE() with CONFIG_LTO=y Marco Elver
2026-01-30 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] arm64: Fix non-atomic " Marco Elver
2026-01-30 15:06   ` David Laight
2026-01-30 13:28 ` Marco Elver [this message]
2026-01-30 15:11   ` [PATCH v3 2/3] arm64: Optimize " David Laight
2026-02-02 15:36   ` Will Deacon
2026-02-02 16:01     ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-02 16:05       ` Will Deacon
2026-02-02 17:48         ` Marco Elver
2026-02-02 19:28     ` David Laight
2026-01-30 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] arm64, compiler-context-analysis: Permit alias analysis through " Marco Elver
2026-01-30 15:13   ` David Laight
2026-02-02 15:39   ` Will Deacon
2026-02-02 19:29     ` David Laight
2026-02-03 11:47       ` Will Deacon
2026-02-04 10:46         ` Marco Elver
2026-02-04 13:14           ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-04 14:15             ` Will Deacon
2026-02-06 15:09               ` Marco Elver
2026-02-06 18:26                 ` David Laight
2026-02-15 21:55                   ` Marco Elver
2026-02-15 22:16                     ` David Laight
2026-02-15 22:43                       ` Marco Elver
2026-02-15 23:18                         ` David Laight
2026-02-15 23:40                         ` Linus Torvalds
2026-02-16 11:09                           ` David Laight
2026-02-16 15:32                             ` Linus Torvalds
2026-02-16 17:43                               ` David Laight
2026-02-17 12:16                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-17 14:25                                   ` David Laight
2026-02-17 16:23                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2026-02-17 16:32                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2026-02-18 19:34                                     ` Boqun Feng
2026-02-18 20:18                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2026-02-19 15:21                                     ` Gary Guo
2026-02-19 18:36                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2026-02-02 19:13 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] arm64: Fixes for " Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260130132951.2714396-3-elver@google.com \
    --to=elver@google.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox