From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>, Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 09/20] KVM: arm64: Convert HCR_EL2.RW to AS_RES1
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2026 18:43:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260202184329.2724080-10-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260202184329.2724080-1-maz@kernel.org>
Now that we have the AS_RES1 constraint, it becomes trivial to express
the HCR_EL2.RW behaviour.
Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/config.c | 15 +--------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/config.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/config.c
index 2ca85c986ff14..eefd2e6a38a1f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/config.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/config.c
@@ -389,19 +389,6 @@ static bool feat_vmid16(struct kvm *kvm)
return kvm_has_feat_enum(kvm, ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1, VMIDBits, 16);
}
-static bool compute_hcr_rw(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *bits)
-{
- /* This is purely academic: AArch32 and NV are mutually exclusive */
- if (bits) {
- if (kvm_has_feat(kvm, FEAT_AA32EL1))
- *bits &= ~HCR_EL2_RW;
- else
- *bits |= HCR_EL2_RW;
- }
-
- return true;
-}
-
static bool compute_hcr_e2h(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *bits)
{
if (bits) {
@@ -967,7 +954,7 @@ static const DECLARE_FEAT_MAP(hcrx_desc, __HCRX_EL2,
static const struct reg_bits_to_feat_map hcr_feat_map[] = {
NEEDS_FEAT(HCR_EL2_TID0, FEAT_AA32EL0),
- NEEDS_FEAT_FIXED(HCR_EL2_RW, compute_hcr_rw),
+ NEEDS_FEAT_FLAG(HCR_EL2_RW, AS_RES1, FEAT_AA32EL1),
NEEDS_FEAT(HCR_EL2_HCD, not_feat_aa64el3),
NEEDS_FEAT(HCR_EL2_AMO |
HCR_EL2_BSU |
--
2.47.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-02 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-02 18:43 [PATCH v2 00/20] KVM: arm64: Generalise RESx handling Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 01/20] arm64: Convert SCTLR_EL2 to sysreg infrastructure Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 02/20] KVM: arm64: Remove duplicate configuration for SCTLR_EL1.{EE,E0E} Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 03/20] KVM: arm64: Introduce standalone FGU computing primitive Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 04/20] KVM: arm64: Introduce data structure tracking both RES0 and RES1 bits Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 05/20] KVM: arm64: Extend unified RESx handling to runtime sanitisation Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 06/20] KVM: arm64: Inherit RESx bits from FGT register descriptors Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 07/20] KVM: arm64: Allow RES1 bits to be inferred from configuration Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 08/20] KVM: arm64: Correctly handle SCTLR_EL1 RES1 bits for unsupported features Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 10/20] KVM: arm64: Simplify FIXED_VALUE handling Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 11/20] KVM: arm64: Add REQUIRES_E2H1 constraint as configuration flags Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 12/20] KVM: arm64: Add RES1_WHEN_E2Hx constraints " Marc Zyngier
2026-02-03 9:39 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 13/20] KVM: arm64: Move RESx into individual register descriptors Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 14/20] KVM: arm64: Simplify handling of HCR_EL2.E2H RESx Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 15/20] KVM: arm64: Get rid of FIXED_VALUE altogether Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 16/20] KVM: arm64: Simplify handling of full register invalid constraint Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 17/20] KVM: arm64: Remove all traces of FEAT_TME Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 18/20] KVM: arm64: Remove all traces of HCR_EL2.MIOCNCE Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 19/20] KVM: arm64: Add sanitisation to SCTLR_EL2 Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 20/20] KVM: arm64: Add debugfs file dumping computed RESx values Marc Zyngier
2026-02-03 9:41 ` [PATCH v2 00/20] KVM: arm64: Generalise RESx handling Fuad Tabba
2026-02-05 9:08 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260202184329.2724080-10-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox