From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>, Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 13/20] KVM: arm64: Move RESx into individual register descriptors
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2026 18:43:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260202184329.2724080-14-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260202184329.2724080-1-maz@kernel.org>
Instead of hacking the RES1 bits at runtime, move them into the
register descriptors. This makes it significantly nicer.
Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/config.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/config.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/config.c
index 7e8e42c1cee4a..474d5c8038c24 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/config.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/config.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ struct reg_bits_to_feat_map {
#define REQUIRES_E2H1 BIT(5) /* Add HCR_EL2.E2H RES1 as a pre-condition */
#define RES1_WHEN_E2H0 BIT(6) /* RES1 when E2H=0 and not supported */
#define RES1_WHEN_E2H1 BIT(7) /* RES1 when E2H=1 and not supported */
+#define FORCE_RESx BIT(8) /* Unconditional RESx */
unsigned long flags;
@@ -87,6 +88,12 @@ struct reg_feat_map_desc {
.match = (fun), \
}
+#define __NEEDS_FEAT_0(m, f, w, ...) \
+ { \
+ .w = (m), \
+ .flags = (f), \
+ }
+
#define __NEEDS_FEAT_FLAG(m, f, w, ...) \
CONCATENATE(__NEEDS_FEAT_, COUNT_ARGS(__VA_ARGS__))(m, f, w, __VA_ARGS__)
@@ -105,10 +112,14 @@ struct reg_feat_map_desc {
*/
#define NEEDS_FEAT(m, ...) NEEDS_FEAT_FLAG(m, 0, __VA_ARGS__)
+/* Declare fixed RESx bits */
+#define FORCE_RES0(m) NEEDS_FEAT_FLAG(m, FORCE_RESx)
+#define FORCE_RES1(m) NEEDS_FEAT_FLAG(m, FORCE_RESx | AS_RES1)
+
/*
- * Declare the dependency between a non-FGT register, a set of
- * feature, and the set of individual bits it contains. This generates
- * a struct reg_feat_map_desc.
+ * Declare the dependency between a non-FGT register, a set of features,
+ * and the set of individual bits it contains. This generates a struct
+ * reg_feat_map_desc.
*/
#define DECLARE_FEAT_MAP(n, r, m, f) \
struct reg_feat_map_desc n = { \
@@ -1007,6 +1018,8 @@ static const struct reg_bits_to_feat_map hcr_feat_map[] = {
HCR_EL2_TWEDEn,
FEAT_TWED),
NEEDS_FEAT_FIXED(HCR_EL2_E2H, compute_hcr_e2h),
+ FORCE_RES0(HCR_EL2_RES0),
+ FORCE_RES1(HCR_EL2_RES1),
};
static const DECLARE_FEAT_MAP(hcr_desc, HCR_EL2,
@@ -1027,6 +1040,8 @@ static const struct reg_bits_to_feat_map sctlr2_feat_map[] = {
SCTLR2_EL1_CPTM |
SCTLR2_EL1_CPTM0,
FEAT_CPA2),
+ FORCE_RES0(SCTLR2_EL1_RES0),
+ FORCE_RES1(SCTLR2_EL1_RES1),
};
static const DECLARE_FEAT_MAP(sctlr2_desc, SCTLR2_EL1,
@@ -1052,6 +1067,8 @@ static const struct reg_bits_to_feat_map tcr2_el2_feat_map[] = {
TCR2_EL2_E0POE,
FEAT_S1POE),
NEEDS_FEAT(TCR2_EL2_PIE, FEAT_S1PIE),
+ FORCE_RES0(TCR2_EL2_RES0),
+ FORCE_RES1(TCR2_EL2_RES1),
};
static const DECLARE_FEAT_MAP(tcr2_el2_desc, TCR2_EL2,
@@ -1129,6 +1146,8 @@ static const struct reg_bits_to_feat_map sctlr_el1_feat_map[] = {
SCTLR_EL1_A |
SCTLR_EL1_M,
FEAT_AA64EL1),
+ FORCE_RES0(SCTLR_EL1_RES0),
+ FORCE_RES1(SCTLR_EL1_RES1),
};
static const DECLARE_FEAT_MAP(sctlr_el1_desc, SCTLR_EL1,
@@ -1163,6 +1182,8 @@ static const struct reg_bits_to_feat_map mdcr_el2_feat_map[] = {
MDCR_EL2_TDE |
MDCR_EL2_TDRA,
FEAT_AA64EL1),
+ FORCE_RES0(MDCR_EL2_RES0),
+ FORCE_RES1(MDCR_EL2_RES1),
};
static const DECLARE_FEAT_MAP(mdcr_el2_desc, MDCR_EL2,
@@ -1201,6 +1222,8 @@ static const struct reg_bits_to_feat_map vtcr_el2_feat_map[] = {
VTCR_EL2_SL0 |
VTCR_EL2_T0SZ,
FEAT_AA64EL1),
+ FORCE_RES0(VTCR_EL2_RES0),
+ FORCE_RES1(VTCR_EL2_RES1),
};
static const DECLARE_FEAT_MAP(vtcr_el2_desc, VTCR_EL2,
@@ -1211,8 +1234,14 @@ static void __init check_feat_map(const struct reg_bits_to_feat_map *map,
{
u64 mask = 0;
+ /*
+ * Don't account for FORCE_RESx that are architectural, and
+ * therefore part of the resx parameter. Other FORCE_RESx bits
+ * are implementation choices, and therefore accounted for.
+ */
for (int i = 0; i < map_size; i++)
- mask |= map[i].bits;
+ if (!((map[i].flags & FORCE_RESx) && (map[i].bits & resx)))
+ mask |= map[i].bits;
if (mask != ~resx)
kvm_err("Undefined %s behaviour, bits %016llx\n",
@@ -1284,13 +1313,16 @@ static struct resx compute_resx_bits(struct kvm *kvm,
if (map[i].flags & exclude)
continue;
- switch (map[i].flags & (CALL_FUNC | FIXED_VALUE)) {
+ switch (map[i].flags & (FORCE_RESx | CALL_FUNC | FIXED_VALUE)) {
case CALL_FUNC | FIXED_VALUE:
map[i].fval(kvm, &resx);
continue;
case CALL_FUNC:
match = map[i].match(kvm);
break;
+ case FORCE_RESx:
+ match = false;
+ break;
default:
match = idreg_feat_match(kvm, &map[i]);
}
@@ -1434,28 +1466,22 @@ struct resx get_reg_fixed_bits(struct kvm *kvm, enum vcpu_sysreg reg)
break;
case HCR_EL2:
resx = compute_reg_resx_bits(kvm, &hcr_desc, 0, 0);
- resx.res1 |= HCR_EL2_RES1;
break;
case SCTLR2_EL1:
case SCTLR2_EL2:
resx = compute_reg_resx_bits(kvm, &sctlr2_desc, 0, 0);
- resx.res1 |= SCTLR2_EL1_RES1;
break;
case TCR2_EL2:
resx = compute_reg_resx_bits(kvm, &tcr2_el2_desc, 0, 0);
- resx.res1 |= TCR2_EL2_RES1;
break;
case SCTLR_EL1:
resx = compute_reg_resx_bits(kvm, &sctlr_el1_desc, 0, 0);
- resx.res1 |= SCTLR_EL1_RES1;
break;
case MDCR_EL2:
resx = compute_reg_resx_bits(kvm, &mdcr_el2_desc, 0, 0);
- resx.res1 |= MDCR_EL2_RES1;
break;
case VTCR_EL2:
resx = compute_reg_resx_bits(kvm, &vtcr_el2_desc, 0, 0);
- resx.res1 |= VTCR_EL2_RES1;
break;
default:
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
--
2.47.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-02 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-02 18:43 [PATCH v2 00/20] KVM: arm64: Generalise RESx handling Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 01/20] arm64: Convert SCTLR_EL2 to sysreg infrastructure Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 02/20] KVM: arm64: Remove duplicate configuration for SCTLR_EL1.{EE,E0E} Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 03/20] KVM: arm64: Introduce standalone FGU computing primitive Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 04/20] KVM: arm64: Introduce data structure tracking both RES0 and RES1 bits Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 05/20] KVM: arm64: Extend unified RESx handling to runtime sanitisation Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 06/20] KVM: arm64: Inherit RESx bits from FGT register descriptors Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 07/20] KVM: arm64: Allow RES1 bits to be inferred from configuration Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 08/20] KVM: arm64: Correctly handle SCTLR_EL1 RES1 bits for unsupported features Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 09/20] KVM: arm64: Convert HCR_EL2.RW to AS_RES1 Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 10/20] KVM: arm64: Simplify FIXED_VALUE handling Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 11/20] KVM: arm64: Add REQUIRES_E2H1 constraint as configuration flags Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 12/20] KVM: arm64: Add RES1_WHEN_E2Hx constraints " Marc Zyngier
2026-02-03 9:39 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-02-02 18:43 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 14/20] KVM: arm64: Simplify handling of HCR_EL2.E2H RESx Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 15/20] KVM: arm64: Get rid of FIXED_VALUE altogether Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 16/20] KVM: arm64: Simplify handling of full register invalid constraint Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 17/20] KVM: arm64: Remove all traces of FEAT_TME Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 18/20] KVM: arm64: Remove all traces of HCR_EL2.MIOCNCE Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 19/20] KVM: arm64: Add sanitisation to SCTLR_EL2 Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 20/20] KVM: arm64: Add debugfs file dumping computed RESx values Marc Zyngier
2026-02-03 9:41 ` [PATCH v2 00/20] KVM: arm64: Generalise RESx handling Fuad Tabba
2026-02-05 9:08 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260202184329.2724080-14-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox