From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>, Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 03/20] KVM: arm64: Introduce standalone FGU computing primitive
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2026 18:43:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260202184329.2724080-4-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260202184329.2724080-1-maz@kernel.org>
Computing the FGU bits is made oddly complicated, as we use the RES0
helper instead of using a specific abstraction.
Introduce such an abstraction, which is going to make things significantly
simpler in the future.
Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/config.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/config.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/config.c
index 0bcdb39885734..2122599f7cbbd 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/config.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/config.c
@@ -1335,26 +1335,30 @@ static u64 compute_res0_bits(struct kvm *kvm,
static u64 compute_reg_res0_bits(struct kvm *kvm,
const struct reg_feat_map_desc *r,
unsigned long require, unsigned long exclude)
-
{
u64 res0;
res0 = compute_res0_bits(kvm, r->bit_feat_map, r->bit_feat_map_sz,
require, exclude);
- /*
- * If computing FGUs, don't take RES0 or register existence
- * into account -- we're not computing bits for the register
- * itself.
- */
- if (!(exclude & NEVER_FGU)) {
- res0 |= compute_res0_bits(kvm, &r->feat_map, 1, require, exclude);
- res0 |= ~reg_feat_map_bits(&r->feat_map);
- }
+ res0 |= compute_res0_bits(kvm, &r->feat_map, 1, require, exclude);
+ res0 |= ~reg_feat_map_bits(&r->feat_map);
return res0;
}
+static u64 compute_fgu_bits(struct kvm *kvm, const struct reg_feat_map_desc *r)
+{
+ /*
+ * If computing FGUs, we collect the unsupported feature bits as
+ * RES0 bits, but don't take the actual RES0 bits or register
+ * existence into account -- we're not computing bits for the
+ * register itself.
+ */
+ return compute_res0_bits(kvm, r->bit_feat_map, r->bit_feat_map_sz,
+ 0, NEVER_FGU);
+}
+
static u64 compute_reg_fixed_bits(struct kvm *kvm,
const struct reg_feat_map_desc *r,
u64 *fixed_bits, unsigned long require,
@@ -1370,40 +1374,29 @@ void compute_fgu(struct kvm *kvm, enum fgt_group_id fgt)
switch (fgt) {
case HFGRTR_GROUP:
- val |= compute_reg_res0_bits(kvm, &hfgrtr_desc,
- 0, NEVER_FGU);
- val |= compute_reg_res0_bits(kvm, &hfgwtr_desc,
- 0, NEVER_FGU);
+ val |= compute_fgu_bits(kvm, &hfgrtr_desc);
+ val |= compute_fgu_bits(kvm, &hfgwtr_desc);
break;
case HFGITR_GROUP:
- val |= compute_reg_res0_bits(kvm, &hfgitr_desc,
- 0, NEVER_FGU);
+ val |= compute_fgu_bits(kvm, &hfgitr_desc);
break;
case HDFGRTR_GROUP:
- val |= compute_reg_res0_bits(kvm, &hdfgrtr_desc,
- 0, NEVER_FGU);
- val |= compute_reg_res0_bits(kvm, &hdfgwtr_desc,
- 0, NEVER_FGU);
+ val |= compute_fgu_bits(kvm, &hdfgrtr_desc);
+ val |= compute_fgu_bits(kvm, &hdfgwtr_desc);
break;
case HAFGRTR_GROUP:
- val |= compute_reg_res0_bits(kvm, &hafgrtr_desc,
- 0, NEVER_FGU);
+ val |= compute_fgu_bits(kvm, &hafgrtr_desc);
break;
case HFGRTR2_GROUP:
- val |= compute_reg_res0_bits(kvm, &hfgrtr2_desc,
- 0, NEVER_FGU);
- val |= compute_reg_res0_bits(kvm, &hfgwtr2_desc,
- 0, NEVER_FGU);
+ val |= compute_fgu_bits(kvm, &hfgrtr2_desc);
+ val |= compute_fgu_bits(kvm, &hfgwtr2_desc);
break;
case HFGITR2_GROUP:
- val |= compute_reg_res0_bits(kvm, &hfgitr2_desc,
- 0, NEVER_FGU);
+ val |= compute_fgu_bits(kvm, &hfgitr2_desc);
break;
case HDFGRTR2_GROUP:
- val |= compute_reg_res0_bits(kvm, &hdfgrtr2_desc,
- 0, NEVER_FGU);
- val |= compute_reg_res0_bits(kvm, &hdfgwtr2_desc,
- 0, NEVER_FGU);
+ val |= compute_fgu_bits(kvm, &hdfgrtr2_desc);
+ val |= compute_fgu_bits(kvm, &hdfgwtr2_desc);
break;
default:
BUG();
--
2.47.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-02 18:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-02 18:43 [PATCH v2 00/20] KVM: arm64: Generalise RESx handling Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 01/20] arm64: Convert SCTLR_EL2 to sysreg infrastructure Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 02/20] KVM: arm64: Remove duplicate configuration for SCTLR_EL1.{EE,E0E} Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 04/20] KVM: arm64: Introduce data structure tracking both RES0 and RES1 bits Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 05/20] KVM: arm64: Extend unified RESx handling to runtime sanitisation Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 06/20] KVM: arm64: Inherit RESx bits from FGT register descriptors Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 07/20] KVM: arm64: Allow RES1 bits to be inferred from configuration Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 08/20] KVM: arm64: Correctly handle SCTLR_EL1 RES1 bits for unsupported features Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 09/20] KVM: arm64: Convert HCR_EL2.RW to AS_RES1 Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 10/20] KVM: arm64: Simplify FIXED_VALUE handling Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 11/20] KVM: arm64: Add REQUIRES_E2H1 constraint as configuration flags Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 12/20] KVM: arm64: Add RES1_WHEN_E2Hx constraints " Marc Zyngier
2026-02-03 9:39 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 13/20] KVM: arm64: Move RESx into individual register descriptors Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 14/20] KVM: arm64: Simplify handling of HCR_EL2.E2H RESx Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 15/20] KVM: arm64: Get rid of FIXED_VALUE altogether Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 16/20] KVM: arm64: Simplify handling of full register invalid constraint Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 17/20] KVM: arm64: Remove all traces of FEAT_TME Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 18/20] KVM: arm64: Remove all traces of HCR_EL2.MIOCNCE Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 19/20] KVM: arm64: Add sanitisation to SCTLR_EL2 Marc Zyngier
2026-02-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 20/20] KVM: arm64: Add debugfs file dumping computed RESx values Marc Zyngier
2026-02-03 9:41 ` [PATCH v2 00/20] KVM: arm64: Generalise RESx handling Fuad Tabba
2026-02-05 9:08 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260202184329.2724080-4-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox