From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57ADFEF06FA for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2026 23:31:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=wIFi9EpRnhwtDIqLczwRt4cw5x9CO68vcVFcvmpAQIQ=; b=v5fHnc4gsD55Vv+6sf+c6Ap/gJ g+4ow+7Vgr/EuLGfYiqLVInpE8yS+4KKvH7pcUrVC7oLj0uQBtnI7XggR5nkORARVF5QR+L0tLMQx e1MAKsGsfQ0lZVRWBftefOaGd8glNCUgqusGR5EbaCFQg9MhAWY8Ks9NFZLbojxjqfq5IFl5/DemW 1YZwt62WpG6Ig5nQ/H94nz/GG2r/1jAfUHKSNqwfaE1Wu2CyoAUjCsAl70cpsoxP8uxAoalOfpbxK +HUWpsghEaTDiQ0xDmsFcjhMlCUwNNLivLyfuV7VgEKEcAQuzemYX63gkij1GVqnfYNGyi51gnuig CuJBpa8g==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vpEF1-0000000EZ7K-30Me; Sun, 08 Feb 2026 23:30:59 +0000 Received: from perceval.ideasonboard.com ([213.167.242.64]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vpEEz-0000000EZ6r-06mM for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2026 23:30:58 +0000 Received: from killaraus.ideasonboard.com (2001-14ba-703d-e500--2a1.rev.dnainternet.fi [IPv6:2001:14ba:703d:e500::2a1]) by perceval.ideasonboard.com (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPSA id 4B5B582A; Mon, 9 Feb 2026 00:30:10 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ideasonboard.com; s=mail; t=1770593410; bh=BqBwXlW1DYlKifkNzuD8EgN86/kfJHvciyDW4WXpDPg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=a/R3LPSpkb93wFdSWlOX+/jeCfLOWluI9DhYaiJ+yJSYViQVHcpq2vU/8sQbNM8KW OzgvhCQDj4C29gAhRIz/QUtDJkAZwZ1B0An2C4xXoRtexqrXdGpW4BkrBAeKi/GBLD X7uukJHcWOKAMAPGF88XW8kAiir3KJ3mnbQTR9/M= Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2026 01:30:54 +0200 From: Laurent Pinchart To: "Russell King (Oracle)" Cc: Ovidiu Panait , Alexandre Torgue , Andrew Lunn , Andrew Lunn , Clark Wang , Daniel Scally , "David S. Miller" , Emanuele Ghidoli , Eric Dumazet , Fabio Estevam , Heiner Kallweit , imx@lists.linux.dev, Jakub Kicinski , Kieran Bingham , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, Maxime Coquelin , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Oleksij Rempel , Paolo Abeni , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Rob Herring , Sascha Hauer , Shawn Guo , Stefan Klug , Wei Fang Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next] net: stmmac: provide flag to disable EEE Message-ID: <20260208233054.GA1987960@killaraus.ideasonboard.com> References: <20260203231832.GB133801@killaraus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260203231832.GB133801@killaraus> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260208_153057_231131_B3C713EA X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 24.25 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 01:18:33AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Tue, Feb 03, 2026 at 12:17:06AM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 02, 2026 at 10:23:45PM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 02, 2026 at 08:54:52PM +0200, Ovidiu Panait wrote: > > > > If not, maybe this patch could be merged to add the flag that disables > > > > EEE and I will just send a patch to disable EEE on our platforms as well. > > > > > > We still need the flag to disable EEE for platforms where lpi_intr_o is > > > logically OR'd with the other interrupts, so there's no way to ignore > > > its persistent assertion. > > > > I'll also state that we need both patches, but there's no point pushing > > my original patch (to allow EEE to be disabled) unless Laurent is going > > to also submit a patch to make use of the flag - the EEE disable and > > Laurent's patch needs to be part of a series. We don't merge stuff that > > adds facilities that have no users, because that's been proven time and > > time again to be a recipe for accumulating cruft. > > Sorry for having dropped the ball on this. Your patch arrived just when > I travelled to Japan for a month, and then it got burried in my inbox. > Now that it has resurfaced, and that an issue that prevented i.MX8MP > from booting with v6.19-rc has been fixed, I'll rebase my kernel and > finally fix that problem. Done. https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260208232931.2272237-1-laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com > Once again, thank you for all your help with this issue, you have been > extremely helpful and I'm very grateful. > > > So, at the moment, "net: stmmac: provide flag to disable EEE" ain't > > going anywhere until there's a patch that makes use of the new flag. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart