From: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org (open list:SAMSUNG THERMAL DRIVER),
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org (open list:SAMSUNG THERMAL
DRIVER),
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG
S3C, S5P AND EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES),
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
Cc: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v8 0/9] Exynos Thermal code improvement
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2026 23:48:57 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260214181930.238981-1-linux.amoon@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi All,
This patch series is a rework of my previous patch series [1],
where the code changes were not adequately justified.
In this new series, I have improved the commit subject
and commit message to better explain the changes.
v8: Refactor SoC-specific configuration to new exynos_tmu_soc_config
structure which help clean up the callbacks.
dropped the IRQ clean up patches, with new approach
it will be much eaasy for new SoC to be integrated
and the code will be much better way managed in the future.
v7: Integrated my RFC patch which improves the IRQ framework
for all the SoC link below.
v6: Add new patch to use devm_clk_get_enabled
and Fix few typo in subject as suggested by Daniel.
v5: Drop the guard mutex patch
v4: Tried to address Lukasz review comments.
I dont have any Arm64 device the test and verify
Tested on 32 bit Arch Odroid U3 amd XU4 SoC boards.
Please sare the feedback on this.
[7] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250813131007.343402-1-linux.amoon@gmail.com/
[6] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250616163831.8138-1-linux.amoon@gmail.com/
[5] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250430123306.15072-1-linux.amoon@gmail.com/
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250410063754.5483-2-linux.amoon@gmail.com/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250310143450.8276-2-linux.amoon@gmail.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250216195850.5352-2-linux.amoon@gmail.com/
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220515064126.1424-1-linux.amoon@gmail.com/
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CANAwSgS=08fVsqn95WHzSF71WTTyD2-=K2C6-BEz0tY0t6A1-g@mail.gmail.com/T/#m77e57120d230d57f34c29e1422d7fc5f5587ac30
Thanks
-Anand
Anand Moon (9):
thermal/drivers/exynos: Refactor clk_sec initialization inside
SOC-specific case
thermal/drivers/exynos: Use devm_clk_get_enabled() helpers
thermal/drivers/exynos: Remove redundant IS_ERR() checks for clk_sec
clock
thermal/drivers/exynos: Fixed the efuse min max value for exynos5422
thermal/drivers/exynos: Remove unused base_second mapping and
references
thermal/drivers/exynos: Refactor SoC-specific configuration to new
exynos_tmu_soc_config structure
thermal/drivers/exynos: Relocate exynos_sensor_ops for forward
declatition
thermal/drivers/exynos: Add missing drvdata assignment in Exynos TMU
probe
thermal/drivers/exynos: Fix some coding style issue
drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 501 +++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 249 insertions(+), 252 deletions(-)
base-commit: 770aaedb461a055f79b971d538678942b6607894
--
2.50.1
next reply other threads:[~2026-02-14 18:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-14 18:18 Anand Moon [this message]
2026-02-14 18:18 ` [PATCH v8 1/9] thermal/drivers/exynos: Refactor clk_sec initialization inside SOC-specific case Anand Moon
2026-02-14 18:18 ` [PATCH v8 2/9] thermal/drivers/exynos: Use devm_clk_get_enabled() helpers Anand Moon
2026-02-14 18:19 ` [PATCH v8 3/9] thermal/drivers/exynos: Remove redundant IS_ERR() checks for clk_sec clock Anand Moon
2026-02-14 18:19 ` [PATCH v8 4/9] thermal/drivers/exynos: Fixed the efuse min max value for exynos5422 Anand Moon
2026-02-14 18:19 ` [PATCH v8 5/9] thermal/drivers/exynos: Remove unused base_second mapping and references Anand Moon
2026-02-14 18:19 ` [PATCH v8 6/9] thermal/drivers/exynos: Refactor SoC-specific configuration to new exynos_tmu_soc_config structure Anand Moon
2026-02-14 18:19 ` [PATCH v8 7/9] thermal/drivers/exynos: Relocate exynos_sensor_ops for forward declatition Anand Moon
2026-02-14 18:19 ` [PATCH v8 8/9] thermal/drivers/exynos: Add missing drvdata assignment in Exynos TMU probe Anand Moon
2026-02-14 18:19 ` [PATCH v8 9/9] thermal/drivers/exynos: Fix some coding style issue Anand Moon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260214181930.238981-1-linux.amoon@gmail.com \
--to=linux.amoon@gmail.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox