From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@kernel.org>
Cc: Jernej Skrabec <jernej@kernel.org>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: sunxi-ng: sun55i-a523-r: Add missing r-spi module clock
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2026 15:57:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260217155717.0b99c310@orionap.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260217093004.3239051-1-wens@kernel.org>
On Tue, 17 Feb 2026 17:30:03 +0800
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@kernel.org> wrote:
Hi,
> When the PRCM clk driver was added, somehow the r-spi module clock
> was skipped over.
>
> Add it so that r-spi can actually work.
The patch itself looks fine, compared against the manual, so for that:
Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
But I noticed one thing below....
> Fixes: 8cea339cfb81 ("clk: sunxi-ng: add support for the A523/T527 PRCM CCU")
> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun55i-a523-r.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun55i-a523-r.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun55i-a523-r.c
> index 0339c4af0fe5..db0e36d8838e 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun55i-a523-r.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun55i-a523-r.c
> @@ -83,9 +83,22 @@ static SUNXI_CCU_MUX_DATA_WITH_GATE(r_pwmctrl_clk, "r-pwmctrl",
> static SUNXI_CCU_GATE_HW(bus_r_pwmctrl_clk, "bus-r-pwmctrl",
> &r_apb0_clk.common.hw, 0x13c, BIT(0), 0);
>
> -/* SPI clock is /M/N (same as new MMC?) */
Ooops, looks like I saw that clock, but someone managed to dodge it :-(
Sorry about that.
> +static const struct clk_parent_data r_spi_parents[] = {
> + { .fw_name = "hosc" },
> + { .fw_name = "pll-periph" },
> + { .name = "pll-periph0-300M" },
> + { .name = "pll-periph1-300M" },
> + { .name = "pll-audio" },
Looking a bit closer, all the PRCM PLL-AUDIO clocks in the manual refer to
AUDIO1PLL4X, which is provided by the MCU CCU, not AUDIO0PLL4X provided by
the main CCU. So we would need to change the DT? I wonder if that breaks
boots with kernels which didn't know the MCU CCU yet (v6.15-v6.17)?
Cheers,
Andre.
> +};
> +static SUNXI_CCU_DUALDIV_MUX_GATE(r_spi_clk, "r-spi", r_spi_parents, 0x150,
> + 0, 5, /* M */
> + 8, 5, /* P */
> + 24, 3, /* mux */
> + BIT(31), /* gate */
> + 0);
> static SUNXI_CCU_GATE_HW(bus_r_spi_clk, "bus-r-spi",
> &r_ahb_clk.common.hw, 0x15c, BIT(0), 0);
> +
> static SUNXI_CCU_GATE_HW(bus_r_spinlock_clk, "bus-r-spinlock",
> &r_ahb_clk.common.hw, 0x16c, BIT(0), 0);
> static SUNXI_CCU_GATE_HW(bus_r_msgbox_clk, "bus-r-msgbox",
> @@ -138,6 +151,7 @@ static struct ccu_common *sun55i_a523_r_ccu_clks[] = {
> &bus_r_twd_clk.common,
> &r_pwmctrl_clk.common,
> &bus_r_pwmctrl_clk.common,
> + &r_spi_clk.common,
> &bus_r_spi_clk.common,
> &bus_r_spinlock_clk.common,
> &bus_r_msgbox_clk.common,
> @@ -169,6 +183,7 @@ static struct clk_hw_onecell_data sun55i_a523_r_hw_clks = {
> [CLK_BUS_R_TWD] = &bus_r_twd_clk.common.hw,
> [CLK_R_PWMCTRL] = &r_pwmctrl_clk.common.hw,
> [CLK_BUS_R_PWMCTRL] = &bus_r_pwmctrl_clk.common.hw,
> + [CLK_R_SPI] = &r_spi_clk.common.hw,
> [CLK_BUS_R_SPI] = &bus_r_spi_clk.common.hw,
> [CLK_BUS_R_SPINLOCK] = &bus_r_spinlock_clk.common.hw,
> [CLK_BUS_R_MSGBOX] = &bus_r_msgbox_clk.common.hw,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-17 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-17 9:30 [PATCH] clk: sunxi-ng: sun55i-a523-r: Add missing r-spi module clock Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-02-17 14:48 ` Jernej Škrabec
2026-02-17 15:57 ` Andre Przywara [this message]
2026-02-17 16:16 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-02-24 17:16 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260217155717.0b99c310@orionap.fritz.box \
--to=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=jernej@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=samuel@sholland.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=wens@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox