public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Dahl <ada@thorsis.com>
To: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>
Cc: Alexander Dahl <ada@thorsis.com>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	Ryan Wanner <ryan.wanner@microchip.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	Srinivas Kandagatla <srini@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 14/19] nvmem: microchip-otpc: Expose UID registers as 2nd nvmem device
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2026 11:38:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260220-maximize-glance-a0abd1806c44@thorsis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <05128a16-553d-49d5-b09d-2c3e03cb4421@tuxon.dev>

Hello Claudiu,

thanks for your feedback on this, see my remarks inline below.

Am Sat, Jan 31, 2026 at 06:11:56PM +0200 schrieb Claudiu Beznea:
> 
> 
> On 1/20/26 17:44, Alexander Dahl wrote:
> > For SAM9X60 the Product UID x Register containing the Unique Product ID
> > is part of the OTPC registers.
> 
> SAMA7G5 as well.
> 
> > We have everything at hand here to just
> > create a trivial nvmem device for those.
> 
> Please massage a bit the patch description to match https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v6.13/process/submitting-patches.html#describe-your-changes
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl <ada@thorsis.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > Notes:
> >      v3:
> >      - no changes
> >      v2:
> >      - Use dev_err_probe() for error reporting (thanks Claudiu)
> >      - Move required register definition over here from removed patch
> > 
> >   drivers/nvmem/microchip-otpc.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >   1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/microchip-otpc.c b/drivers/nvmem/microchip-otpc.c
> > index 34c0d7611f3e4..b35ed13b004bb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/nvmem/microchip-otpc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/nvmem/microchip-otpc.c
> > @@ -25,10 +25,14 @@
> >   #define MCHP_OTPC_HR			(0x20)
> >   #define MCHP_OTPC_HR_SIZE		GENMASK(15, 8)
> >   #define MCHP_OTPC_DR			(0x24)
> > +#define MCHP_OTPC_UID0R			(0x60)
> >   #define MCHP_OTPC_NAME			"mchp-otpc"
> >   #define MCHP_OTPC_SIZE			(11 * 1024)
> > +#define MCHP_OTPC_UID_NAME		"mchp-uid"
> > +#define MCHP_OTPC_UID_SIZE		16
> 
> I think you can drop these as they are used (individually) in a single place.

If you don't mind I would rather keep it here together with already
present similar definitions, instead of sprinkling new literals over
this c file.

> 
> > +
> >   /**
> >    * struct mchp_otpc - OTPC private data structure
> >    * @base: base address
> > @@ -230,6 +234,16 @@ static int mchp_otpc_init_packets_list(struct mchp_otpc *otpc, u32 *size)
> >   	return 0;
> >   }
> > +static int mchp_otpc_uid_read(void *priv, unsigned int offset,
> > +			      void *val, size_t bytes)
> > +{
> > +	struct mchp_otpc *otpc = priv;
> > +
> > +	memcpy_fromio(val, otpc->base + MCHP_OTPC_UID0R + offset, bytes);
> 
> Include <asm-generic/logic_io.h> for this one?

Yes, include what you use, I'd add `#include <linux/io.h>` then, seems
the usual way in drivers/nvmem.

> 
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >   static struct nvmem_config mchp_nvmem_config = {
> >   	.name = MCHP_OTPC_NAME,
> >   	.type = NVMEM_TYPE_OTP,
> > @@ -239,6 +253,15 @@ static struct nvmem_config mchp_nvmem_config = {
> >   	.reg_read = mchp_otpc_read,
> >   };
> > +static struct nvmem_config mchp_otpc_uid_nvmem_config = {
> > +	.name = MCHP_OTPC_UID_NAME,
> 
> Should the type be filled here?

In general I would say yes, but looking at `enum nvmem_type` none of
them seems to match.  IIRC I more or less copied the approach from
drivers/soc/atmel/sfr.c here.

Greets
Alex

> 
> 
> > +	.read_only = true,
> > +	.word_size = 4,
> > +	.stride = 4,
> > +	.size = MCHP_OTPC_UID_SIZE,
> > +	.reg_read = mchp_otpc_uid_read,
> > +};
> > +
> >   static int mchp_otpc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >   {
> >   	struct nvmem_device *nvmem;
> > @@ -269,8 +292,21 @@ static int mchp_otpc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >   	mchp_nvmem_config.size = size;
> >   	mchp_nvmem_config.priv = otpc;
> >   	nvmem = devm_nvmem_register(&pdev->dev, &mchp_nvmem_config);
> > +	if (IS_ERR(nvmem)) {
> > +		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(nvmem),
> > +				     "Error registering OTP as nvmem device\n");
> > +	}
> > -	return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(nvmem);
> > +	mchp_otpc_uid_nvmem_config.dev = otpc->dev;
> > +	mchp_otpc_uid_nvmem_config.priv = otpc;
> > +
> > +	nvmem = devm_nvmem_register(&pdev->dev, &mchp_otpc_uid_nvmem_config);
> > +	if (IS_ERR(nvmem)) {
> > +		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(nvmem),
> > +				     "Error registering UIDxR as nvmem device\n");
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> >   }
> >   static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused mchp_otpc_ids[] = {
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-20 10:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-20 14:37 [PATCH v3 00/19] Microchip OTPC driver on SAM9X60 exposing UIDxR as additional nvmem device Alexander Dahl
2026-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH v3 01/19] MAINTAINERS: Add sam9/sama to (AT91) SoC support Alexander Dahl
2026-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH v3 02/19] dt-bindings: clock: at91: Split up per SoC partially Alexander Dahl
2026-01-22 16:46   ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-01-31 15:43   ` Claudiu Beznea
2026-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH v3 03/19] dt-bindings: clock: at91: Allow referencing main rc oscillator in DT Alexander Dahl
2026-01-31 15:44   ` Claudiu Beznea
2026-02-09  8:08     ` Alexander Dahl
2026-03-08 16:43       ` Claudiu Beznea
2026-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH v3 04/19] clk: at91: Use new PMC bindings Alexander Dahl
2026-01-31 15:44   ` Claudiu Beznea
2026-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH v3 05/19] clk: at91: sama7d65: Use highest PMC definition as max index Alexander Dahl
2026-01-31 15:45   ` Claudiu Beznea
2026-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH v3 06/19] clk: at91: Allow enabling main_rc_osc through DT Alexander Dahl
2026-01-31 15:45   ` Claudiu Beznea
2026-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH v3 07/19] clk: at91: Add peripheral id for OTPC Alexander Dahl
2026-01-31 15:45   ` Claudiu Beznea
2026-01-20 15:44 ` Alexander Dahl
2026-01-20 15:44   ` [PATCH v3 08/19] dt-bindings: nvmem: microchip-otpc: Add compatible for SAM9X60 Alexander Dahl
2026-01-20 15:44   ` [PATCH v3 09/19] dt-bindings: nvmem: microchip-otpc: Add required clocks Alexander Dahl
2026-01-20 16:30     ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-01-31 15:47     ` Claudiu Beznea
2026-01-31 15:51       ` Claudiu Beznea
2026-02-20  9:58       ` Alexander Dahl
2026-03-08 16:42         ` Claudiu Beznea
2026-03-08 16:45           ` Claudiu Beznea
2026-01-20 15:44   ` [PATCH v3 10/19] nvmem: microchip-otpc: Avoid reading a write-only register Alexander Dahl
2026-01-31 15:58     ` Claudiu Beznea
2026-01-20 15:44   ` [PATCH v3 11/19] nvmem: microchip-otpc: Fix swapped 'sleep' and 'timeout' parameters Alexander Dahl
2026-01-31 16:00     ` Claudiu Beznea
2026-01-20 15:44   ` [PATCH v3 12/19] nvmem: microchip-otpc: Add SAM9X60 support Alexander Dahl
2026-01-31 15:53     ` Claudiu Beznea
2026-01-20 15:44   ` [PATCH v3 13/19] nvmem: microchip-otpc: Enable necessary clocks Alexander Dahl
2026-01-31 16:03     ` Claudiu Beznea
2026-01-20 15:44   ` [PATCH v3 14/19] nvmem: microchip-otpc: Expose UID registers as 2nd nvmem device Alexander Dahl
2026-01-31 16:11     ` Claudiu Beznea
2026-02-20 10:38       ` Alexander Dahl [this message]
2026-03-08 16:40         ` Claudiu Beznea
2026-01-20 15:44   ` [PATCH v3 15/19] ARM: dts: microchip: Use new PMC bindings Alexander Dahl
2026-01-20 15:44   ` [PATCH v3 16/19] ARM: dts: microchip: sama7g5: Add OTPC clocks Alexander Dahl
2026-01-20 15:44   ` [PATCH v3 17/19] ARM: dts: microchip: sam9x60: Add OTPC node Alexander Dahl
2026-01-20 15:44   ` [PATCH v3 18/19] ARM: dts: microchip: sam9x60_curiosity: Enable OTP Controller Alexander Dahl
2026-01-20 15:44   ` [PATCH v3 19/19] dt-bindings: clock: at91: Remove old PMC definitions Alexander Dahl
2026-01-22 16:47     ` Rob Herring (Arm)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260220-maximize-glance-a0abd1806c44@thorsis.com \
    --to=ada@thorsis.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
    --cc=ryan.wanner@microchip.com \
    --cc=srini@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox