From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
Linu Cherian <Linu.Cherian@arm.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 03/13] arm64: mm: Implicitly invalidate user ASID based on TLBI operation
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2026 13:55:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260302135602.3716920-4-ryan.roberts@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260302135602.3716920-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com>
When kpti is enabled, separate ASIDs are used for userspace and
kernelspace, requiring ASID-qualified TLB invalidation by virtual
address to invalidate both of them.
Push the logic for invalidating the two ASIDs down into the low-level
tlbi-op-specific functions and remove the burden from the caller to
handle the kpti-specific behaviour.
Co-developed-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 30 +++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
index b3b86e5f7034e..e586d9b71ea2d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
@@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ typedef void (*tlbi_op)(u64 arg);
static __always_inline void vae1is(u64 arg)
{
__tlbi(vae1is, arg);
+ __tlbi_user(vae1is, arg);
}
static __always_inline void vae2is(u64 arg)
@@ -112,11 +113,13 @@ static __always_inline void vae2is(u64 arg)
static __always_inline void vale1(u64 arg)
{
__tlbi(vale1, arg);
+ __tlbi_user(vale1, arg);
}
static __always_inline void vale1is(u64 arg)
{
__tlbi(vale1is, arg);
+ __tlbi_user(vale1is, arg);
}
static __always_inline void vale2is(u64 arg)
@@ -152,11 +155,6 @@ static __always_inline void __tlbi_level(tlbi_op op, u64 addr, u32 level)
op(arg);
}
-#define __tlbi_user_level(op, arg, level) do { \
- if (arm64_kernel_unmapped_at_el0()) \
- __tlbi_level(op, (arg | USER_ASID_FLAG), level); \
-} while (0)
-
/*
* This macro creates a properly formatted VA operand for the TLB RANGE. The
* value bit assignments are:
@@ -444,8 +442,6 @@ static inline void arch_tlbbatch_flush(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch)
* @stride: Flush granularity
* @asid: The ASID of the task (0 for IPA instructions)
* @tlb_level: Translation Table level hint, if known
- * @tlbi_user: If 'true', call an additional __tlbi_user()
- * (typically for user ASIDs). 'flase' for IPA instructions
* @lpa2: If 'true', the lpa2 scheme is used as set out below
*
* When the CPU does not support TLB range operations, flush the TLB
@@ -471,16 +467,19 @@ static inline void arch_tlbbatch_flush(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch)
static __always_inline void rvae1is(u64 arg)
{
__tlbi(rvae1is, arg);
+ __tlbi_user(rvae1is, arg);
}
static __always_inline void rvale1(u64 arg)
{
__tlbi(rvale1, arg);
+ __tlbi_user(rvale1, arg);
}
static __always_inline void rvale1is(u64 arg)
{
__tlbi(rvale1is, arg);
+ __tlbi_user(rvale1is, arg);
}
static __always_inline void rvaale1is(u64 arg)
@@ -499,7 +498,7 @@ static __always_inline void __tlbi_range(tlbi_op op, u64 arg)
}
#define __flush_tlb_range_op(op, start, pages, stride, \
- asid, tlb_level, tlbi_user, lpa2) \
+ asid, tlb_level, lpa2) \
do { \
typeof(start) __flush_start = start; \
typeof(pages) __flush_pages = pages; \
@@ -514,8 +513,6 @@ do { \
(lpa2 && __flush_start != ALIGN(__flush_start, SZ_64K))) { \
addr = __TLBI_VADDR(__flush_start, asid); \
__tlbi_level(op, addr, tlb_level); \
- if (tlbi_user) \
- __tlbi_user_level(op, addr, tlb_level); \
__flush_start += stride; \
__flush_pages -= stride >> PAGE_SHIFT; \
continue; \
@@ -526,8 +523,6 @@ do { \
addr = __TLBI_VADDR_RANGE(__flush_start >> shift, asid, \
scale, num, tlb_level); \
__tlbi_range(r##op, addr); \
- if (tlbi_user) \
- __tlbi_user(r##op, addr); \
__flush_start += __TLBI_RANGE_PAGES(num, scale) << PAGE_SHIFT; \
__flush_pages -= __TLBI_RANGE_PAGES(num, scale);\
} \
@@ -536,7 +531,7 @@ do { \
} while (0)
#define __flush_s2_tlb_range_op(op, start, pages, stride, tlb_level) \
- __flush_tlb_range_op(op, start, pages, stride, 0, tlb_level, false, kvm_lpa2_is_enabled());
+ __flush_tlb_range_op(op, start, pages, stride, 0, tlb_level, kvm_lpa2_is_enabled());
static inline bool __flush_tlb_range_limit_excess(unsigned long start,
unsigned long end, unsigned long pages, unsigned long stride)
@@ -576,10 +571,10 @@ static inline void __flush_tlb_range_nosync(struct mm_struct *mm,
if (last_level)
__flush_tlb_range_op(vale1is, start, pages, stride, asid,
- tlb_level, true, lpa2_is_enabled());
+ tlb_level, lpa2_is_enabled());
else
__flush_tlb_range_op(vae1is, start, pages, stride, asid,
- tlb_level, true, lpa2_is_enabled());
+ tlb_level, lpa2_is_enabled());
mmu_notifier_arch_invalidate_secondary_tlbs(mm, start, end);
}
@@ -604,7 +599,7 @@ static inline void local_flush_tlb_contpte(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
dsb(nshst);
asid = ASID(vma->vm_mm);
__flush_tlb_range_op(vale1, addr, CONT_PTES, PAGE_SIZE, asid,
- 3, true, lpa2_is_enabled());
+ 3, lpa2_is_enabled());
mmu_notifier_arch_invalidate_secondary_tlbs(vma->vm_mm, addr,
addr + CONT_PTE_SIZE);
dsb(nsh);
@@ -638,7 +633,7 @@ static inline void flush_tlb_kernel_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end
dsb(ishst);
__flush_tlb_range_op(vaale1is, start, pages, stride, 0,
- TLBI_TTL_UNKNOWN, false, lpa2_is_enabled());
+ TLBI_TTL_UNKNOWN, lpa2_is_enabled());
__tlbi_sync_s1ish();
isb();
}
@@ -689,6 +684,7 @@ static inline bool huge_pmd_needs_flush(pmd_t oldpmd, pmd_t newpmd)
}
#define huge_pmd_needs_flush huge_pmd_needs_flush
+#undef __tlbi_user
#endif
#endif
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-02 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-02 13:55 [PATCH v3 00/13] arm64: Refactor TLB invalidation API and implementation Ryan Roberts
2026-03-02 13:55 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] arm64: mm: Re-implement the __tlbi_level macro as a C function Ryan Roberts
2026-03-02 13:55 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] arm64: mm: Introduce a C wrapper for by-range TLB invalidation Ryan Roberts
2026-03-02 13:55 ` Ryan Roberts [this message]
2026-03-02 13:55 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] arm64: mm: Push __TLBI_VADDR() into __tlbi_level() Ryan Roberts
2026-03-02 13:55 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] arm64: mm: Inline __TLBI_VADDR_RANGE() into __tlbi_range() Ryan Roberts
2026-03-02 13:55 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] arm64: mm: Re-implement the __flush_tlb_range_op macro in C Ryan Roberts
2026-03-02 13:55 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] arm64: mm: Simplify __TLBI_RANGE_NUM() macro Ryan Roberts
2026-03-02 13:55 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] arm64: mm: Simplify __flush_tlb_range_limit_excess() Ryan Roberts
2026-03-02 13:55 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] arm64: mm: Refactor flush_tlb_page() to use __tlbi_level_asid() Ryan Roberts
2026-03-02 13:55 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] arm64: mm: Refactor __flush_tlb_range() to take flags Ryan Roberts
2026-03-02 13:55 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] arm64: mm: More flags for __flush_tlb_range() Ryan Roberts
2026-03-03 9:57 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-03-03 13:54 ` Ryan Roberts
2026-03-03 17:34 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-03-02 13:55 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] arm64: mm: Wrap flush_tlb_page() around __do_flush_tlb_range() Ryan Roberts
2026-03-03 9:59 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-03-02 13:56 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] arm64: mm: Provide level hint for flush_tlb_page() Ryan Roberts
2026-03-02 14:42 ` Mark Rutland
2026-03-02 17:39 ` Ryan Roberts
2026-03-02 17:56 ` Mark Rutland
2026-03-13 19:43 ` [PATCH v3 00/13] arm64: Refactor TLB invalidation API and implementation Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260302135602.3716920-4-ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--to=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=Linu.Cherian@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox