From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: yabinc@google.com, James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, mark.rutland@arm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Disable TRBE Trace Buffer Unit when running in guest context
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2026 10:36:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260303103632.GH1098637@e132581.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aaHdcKGE94ze2fq9@willie-the-truck>
On Fri, Feb 27, 2026 at 06:07:44PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 12:09:56PM +0000, Leo Yan wrote:
> > [ + Yabin ]
> >
> > Thanks for Suzuki's reminding, I should mention that Yabin reported
> > another lockup issue caused by missing CPU PM support in TRBE driver.
> >
> > We have a patch series to fix the issue:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20251119-arm_coresight_path_power_management_improvement-v5-16-f615a301ad0b@arm.com/
>
> Two nits on that series:
>
> 1. It seems a bit weird to me for the ETE driver to manage TRFCR but for
> the TRBE driver to manage the other registers
TRFCR_ELx is introduced by FEAT_TRF, which is a separate feature from
TRBE, and it can be used for other sinks (like ETR). I think this is
the main reason that it is implemented in ETE driver rather than TRBE
driver.
> 2. Are you sure you don't need to save/restore the TRBE state when
> LIMITR.E is clear? Maybe the driver is fine with that, but I'm worried
> that we could suspend in a half-programmed state and lose some of that
> configuration.
If the TRBLIMITR_EL1.E bit is cleared during the CPU is idle, then the
next time the TRBE trace buffer is re-enabled, trbe_enable_hw() must be
called to reconfigure the TRBE registers (including TRBSR_EL1).
One concern is that after a CPU power cycle, some fields in the TRBE
registers may be in the following state:
"On a cold reset, this field resets to an architecturally UNKNOWN value."
I will change to always save/restore TRBE state. Thanks for
suggestions.
> > Besides your fix the translation regime issue, I'd also suggest applying
> > the CoreSight PM patch series to fix lockup caused by CPU idle.
>
> Yes, we definitely need something like that in the android kernel trees.
> I've previously bodged a hack into the ETE PM notifiers, but if you have
> backports of your series to 6.12, 6.6 and 6.1 then we should merge them
> into Android. As it stands, I don't have a TRBE-capable device running
> mainline.
Let us first merge the series on the master :)
After that, we can consider backporting (I assume Yabin already has a
plan for this). I'd be happy to help with backporting to v6.12.
However, I cannot commit to backporting to v6.6 or v6.1 at this stage,
as many dependencies are likely to be involved.
Thanks,
Leo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-03 10:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-16 13:09 [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Disable TRBE Trace Buffer Unit when running in guest context Will Deacon
2026-02-16 14:29 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-02-16 15:05 ` James Clark
2026-02-16 15:51 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-02-16 16:10 ` James Clark
2026-02-16 16:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-02-20 11:42 ` James Clark
2026-02-24 11:19 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-02-20 15:48 ` Leo Yan
2026-02-24 11:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-02-16 18:14 ` Will Deacon
2026-02-17 14:19 ` Leo Yan
2026-02-17 14:52 ` Will Deacon
2026-02-17 19:01 ` Leo Yan
2026-02-19 13:54 ` Will Deacon
2026-02-19 18:58 ` Leo Yan
2026-02-19 19:06 ` Leo Yan
2026-02-25 12:09 ` Leo Yan
2026-02-27 18:07 ` Will Deacon
2026-03-03 10:36 ` Leo Yan [this message]
2026-03-03 10:47 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-02-16 15:53 ` Alexandru Elisei
2026-02-16 17:10 ` Will Deacon
2026-02-17 12:13 ` Will Deacon
2026-02-16 17:32 ` Will Deacon
2026-02-17 12:20 ` James Clark
2026-02-17 12:26 ` Will Deacon
2026-02-17 13:58 ` James Clark
2026-02-16 15:13 ` James Clark
2026-02-16 17:05 ` Will Deacon
2026-02-17 9:18 ` James Clark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260303103632.GH1098637@e132581.arm.com \
--to=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yabinc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox