From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 837FDF33A8E for ; Thu, 5 Mar 2026 15:20:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To: From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=Dcj0ejoSnW/5eblQMFtU+6rnCGFUr5a/VkoxkVgkFIU=; b=20UkPsQK9NsAIObRBBW9SpjH9A NEHSPhzn0Z7LX7D6MemG3NuBtNVmuxbmQUboJrlY8jGJs9fQx4CuFwDUMSpavFYq0yMDyqWFwurRE 8+uTlqMBrsJSl/G2VVOf40fbZeQ84LZFc7IkSzTrd/Lig4gb/S7C2+npJxMfn/GAdkUJtQDv+9WGk Vk0q2LShizvOfUAtt93ZPpy336Ndi6orkn9hY9vVH2qSFFXZVSSuy4grGDqvGTiyJOy0UMkA43KEo rBYrEc9mF/25Q7ecJvd68BWCRSjMNG2/K/zyYg/h0UsPUdqdAyEIBmuOCX/7rFapKCTtNJGasmazk 6YjkxlDA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vyAUb-000000026X7-026T; Thu, 05 Mar 2026 15:20:01 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c0a:e001:78e:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vyAUZ-000000026Vz-13VH for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2026 15:20:00 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE0C44072B; Thu, 5 Mar 2026 15:19:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E616BC116C6; Thu, 5 Mar 2026 15:19:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1772723997; bh=fiPz7wtqOY5BeMkxwRsGcfzBJ/wpg9ehDqfpzlZwBLQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=cy/zFlEmHAifNQfbSTWPYDYipTTH6trB82Oy0edkNFgF3YpPGscbwDmMl6vOh2a1o cpLko/5dWTKLyg07VjmS9LvqLoqnVHOa10DVNy56/V8v9skgkhMOnmKQiBd13OF6ka /p85yoP6L6p3fmrqnArS85XXxfzOKNwC6EDHgH+oBU82lczxgd0IXLvSjUnlBq/k+l +YQNjeZKi1l1nUxwuU4utBs0zt/8j5Bey0RfbuahW3/7fg8yk9OFdVfa18aPtLZbkr f0hmeSriiIJz++KYt3Q7i1jDkiLdKpJbo3FOMMZWy/DCGjGDbww8vzd28fbZQEWa+C u0XPYXxW/UvsA== Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2026 07:19:56 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: "Russell King (Oracle)" Cc: Andrew Lunn , Alexandre Torgue , Andrew Lunn , Chen-Yu Tsai , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni , Samuel Holland Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/8] net: stmmac: mdio: convert MDC clock divisor selection to tables Message-ID: <20260305071956.08d49615@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260305_071959_311389_E153B9FB X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.13 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, 5 Mar 2026 12:11:06 +0000 Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > On Thu, Mar 05, 2026 at 10:42:26AM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > > Convert the MDC clock divisor selection to tabular format. > > > > Note that there is a change for 300MHz, but this is not a problem, > > as the MDC clock remains within the useable ranges, which are: > > I notice that checkpatch complains about "useable", which it should > not do. "useable" is perfectly correct, especially in British English. > As I'm British, I won't be fixing this checkpatch complaint. Yesterday it reported a warning that someone repeated the word 'very'. As in "this is very very wrong". checkpatch, eh? gold.